Warpath  

Home | Forums | Salary Cap Info | Shop | Donate | Stay Connected




Go Back   Warpath > Redskins Forums > Redskins Locker Room


RGIII Named Starter

Redskins Locker Room


Closed Thread
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 06-06-2012, 11:55 PM   #316
Registered User
 
CultBrennan59's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 6,526
Re: RGIII Named Starter

Report: Browns didn’t like Griffin’s size, Tannehill’s maturity | ProFootballTalk


These browns just don't shut up...get over it, we have him you don't!
CultBrennan59 is offline  

Advertisements
Old 06-07-2012, 12:21 AM   #317
Living Legend
 
That Guy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Springfield, VA
Age: 32
Posts: 16,612
Re: RGIII Named Starter

Quote:
Originally Posted by CultBrennan59 View Post
Report: Browns didnít like Griffinís size, Tannehillís maturity | ProFootballTalk


These browns just don't shut up...get over it, we have him you don't!
so they struck out in the QB market and then decided to say that was the plan all along?

I believe them... no really.
__________________
Who says shameless self promotion is stupid? oh yeah, that was me... Click For Tunes!
That Guy is offline  
Old 06-07-2012, 12:43 AM   #318
Playmaker
 
los panda's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: los angeles, ca
Age: 30
Posts: 4,258
Re: RGIII Named Starter

"[a]nd too eager to show how fast he could run."
yeah, i hate when those guys try to show their strengths
__________________
7 9 21 28 33 42 43 44 49 65 70 81
los panda is offline  
Old 06-07-2012, 09:10 AM   #319
‎\m/
 
Mattyk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 42
Posts: 86,481
Re: RGIII Named Starter

__________________
Support The Warpath! | Warpath Shop
Mattyk is offline  
Old 06-07-2012, 09:15 AM   #320
Living Legend
 
Monkeydad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: PA
Age: 36
Posts: 16,270
Re: RGIII Named Starter

Quote:
Originally Posted by CultBrennan59 View Post
Report: Browns didnít like Griffinís size, Tannehillís maturity | ProFootballTalk


These browns just don't shut up...get over it, we have him you don't!
Makes sense, they liked Weeden's age. A rookie entering his 30s can't fail, right? He has LIFE experience!
__________________
Not sent from a Droid, iPhone, Blackberry or toaster
Monkeydad is offline  
Old 06-07-2012, 09:35 AM   #321
The Starter
 
30gut's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 2,378
Re: RGIII Named Starter

Quote:
Originally Posted by That Guy View Post
so they struck out in the QB market and then decided to say that was the plan all along?

I believe them... no really.
Thankfully, the point im about to make is moot because of RGIII.
But, we you could say something similar about us last year.
__________________
Being on this defense, definitely [Iím] going to be setting the tone for sure, enforcing that. Ainít no walk-throughs [around] here, you what Iím know saying?Ē-Dashon Goldson
30gut is offline  
Old 06-07-2012, 09:44 AM   #322
‎\m/
 
Mattyk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 42
Posts: 86,481
Re: RGIII Named Starter

I get that teams will always sell the positive, but all they could have said is we believe in Weeden as our starter. No need to diss the other prospects in the process of pumping up your own guy.
__________________
Support The Warpath! | Warpath Shop
Mattyk is offline  
Old 06-07-2012, 09:45 AM   #323
Uncle Phil
 
SmootSmack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 45,148
Re: RGIII Named Starter

Quote:
Originally Posted by 30gut View Post
Thankfully, the point im about to make is moot because of RGIII.
But, we you could say something similar about us last year.
I don't follow
__________________
You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You
SmootSmack is offline  
Old 06-07-2012, 10:56 AM   #324
The Starter
 
30gut's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 2,378
Re: RGIII Named Starter

Last year they didn't draft a QB I'm the entire draft (starter or back-up) though it was a need.
And the reason I kept hearing was they didn't like the QBs.
In that sense its similar to the reports that Browns didn't like these QBs (Sweden nws)
But, itsmoot point really.
__________________
Being on this defense, definitely [Iím] going to be setting the tone for sure, enforcing that. Ainít no walk-throughs [around] here, you what Iím know saying?Ē-Dashon Goldson
30gut is offline  
Old 06-07-2012, 11:06 AM   #325
Uncle Phil
 
SmootSmack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 45,148
Re: RGIII Named Starter

Quote:
Originally Posted by 30gut View Post
Last year they didn't draft a QB I'm the entire draft (starter or back-up) though it was a need.
And the reason I kept hearing was they didn't like the QBs.
In that sense its similar to the reports that Browns didn't like these QBs (Sweden nws)
But, itsmoot point really.
But it's not the same. Because it's not like Shanahan spent several weeks openly admitting they were trying to trade up, saying they offered a substantial amount, complaining that the friendship between other executives was the main reason they didn't get that QB....and then saying well we never really wanted him anyway

But as you say, it doesn't matter now.
__________________
You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You
SmootSmack is offline  
Old 06-07-2012, 11:08 AM   #326
Contains football related knowledge
 
JoeRedskin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Second Star On The Right
Age: 52
Posts: 9,381
Re: RGIII Named Starter

^^ Except, we didn't cluster offer a bunch of first rounders in an attempt to move up, lose out, blame the loss on the "old boy" network and then attempt to say we weren't really interested in the first place -- only to grab a guy who would likely have been available in the next round.

Moot or not, the Browns actions are not even remotely similar to what we did last year by simply passing on QB's. If all that the Browns had done was draft Richardson and Weeden (no attempted trade) - then it's a "whatever, dude". As it is, it's just sounds dishonest and pathetic.
__________________
You aren't worth the water in my spit but, maybe, just maybe, you're worth the lead in my shotgun.
JoeRedskin is offline  
Old 06-07-2012, 11:19 AM   #327
‎\m/
 
Mattyk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 42
Posts: 86,481
Re: RGIII Named Starter

The Browns situation is definitely much different.

They really need to just shut the F up about it already.
__________________
Support The Warpath! | Warpath Shop
Mattyk is offline  
Old 06-07-2012, 11:35 AM   #328
Registered User
 
CultBrennan59's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 6,526
Re: RGIII Named Starter

The Browns can't say we don't like any of these QBs in the draft and turn around and draft a 29 year old system QB who threw to an amazing college WR.

I agree with MattyK. They need a nice...
CultBrennan59 is offline  
Old 06-07-2012, 11:57 AM   #329
The Starter
 
30gut's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 2,378
Re: RGIII Named Starter

We needed QBs, they needed a QB
We passed on every QB in the draft, they passed on some QBs
It has been implied that both organizations didn't like the QBs they didn't draft
ēshrugsē not the same, but similar
__________________
Being on this defense, definitely [Iím] going to be setting the tone for sure, enforcing that. Ainít no walk-throughs [around] here, you what Iím know saying?Ē-Dashon Goldson
30gut is offline  
Old 06-07-2012, 12:28 PM   #330
Gamebreaker
 
CRedskinsRule's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Pasadena, Md
Age: 48
Posts: 13,185
Re: RGIII Named Starter

30 gut, I don't think its the same, now if we had drafted Gabbert or Ponder, and said, well we weren't really looking at Locker, then it gets closer, but ultimately, Shanahan always says we got our guy, as does every good coach. They just don't flip as early and as often (unless your name is Jim Harbaugh)
__________________
Dirtbag59, sending songs to oblivion 1 writer at a time.
CRedskinsRule is offline  
Closed Thread

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:44 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site is not officially affiliated with the Washington Redskins or the NFL.
Page generated in 0.26985 seconds with 9 queries

Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0 RC5

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25