RGIII Named Starter

NC_Skins · 05-07-2012, 12:13 PM

I'm not surprised by RGIII being the starter, but I am surprised that Shanahan has named him the starter before any OTAs or training camp.

If you are going to go out, might as well do it in a blaze of glory.....or a giant big billow of smoke depending on the outcome.

NC_Skins · 05-07-2012, 12:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by scowan

Mike Shannahan is putting his whole future on RGIII by naming him the starter.

Well truthfully, he put his future on RGIII the moment that trade was solidified. I guess he sees no harm in naming the dude the starter at this particular time.

budw38 · 05-07-2012, 12:20 PM

looks like Grossman will not be inducted into the PF HOF after all ..... maybe 20 yrs from now RG3 will

skinsguy · 05-07-2012, 12:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by NC_Skins

Well truthfully, he put his future on RGIII the moment that trade was solidified. I guess he sees no harm in naming the dude the starter at this particular time.

Exactly! I think it was a great move for Shanahan to remove any and all doubt from the get go. It sends a message to RGIII that the coaches are 100% behind him and believe in him. I mean, even if the 'skins go 5-11, I'd much rather see them go 5-11 because RGIII is working out the "kinks" rather than seeing Grossman on the field do his Grossman thing.

hooskins · 05-07-2012, 12:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by NC_Skins

I'm not surprised by RGIII being the starter, but I am surprised that Shanahan has named him the starter before any OTAs or training camp.

If you are going to go out, might as well do it in a blaze of glory.....or a giant big billow of smoke depending on the outcome.

I think he saw the ridiculous kirk cousins' media hoopla and decided to put it to rest. If this keep going on into camp and preseason (and if cousins looked OK) the media would've gotten way out of hand.

And like others said, this "decision" was made when they drafted rg3.

firstdown · 05-07-2012, 12:38 PM

Did they really have to announce this and did anyone ever think Rex would start?

Mattyk · 05-07-2012, 12:39 PM

Well it's not like Shanahan came out and declared him the starter. He was asked so he answered. No sense in making any drama out of it.

skinsguy · 05-07-2012, 12:52 PM

Actually the more interesting story will be who starts as the #2 guy. I mean, I think we all pretty much feel Grossman would be the backup, but I think Cousins might be good enough to beat Rex out of that spot. I'd say by next year, Cousins would have the #2 spot wrapped up.

fanarchist · 05-07-2012, 01:17 PM

I've read through this entire thread, and no one has addressed Mike implying 3 times, which should cause ones mind to gravitate toward the inference, that we could be employing some incarnation of the option. You're falling off.

SmootSmack · 05-07-2012, 01:21 PM

Well it was mentioned in another thread...where it probably didn't belong.

"You're falling off" What do you mean by that?

mooby · 05-07-2012, 01:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by fanarchist

I've read through this entire thread, and no one has addressed Mike implying 3 times, which should cause ones mind to gravitate toward the inference, that we could be employing some incarnation of the option. You're falling off.

Oh yeah? Well I haven't read through this thread, mainly because I don't give a shit who Mike calls the starter. If this is what qualifies as "news" nowadays it's no wonder newspapers are going out of business.

SkinItup · 05-07-2012, 01:41 PM

Reason number... let's say 212 why we all like Griffin.

"Running the plays was another matter. It’s different when you know what routes you have on a certain play but you’ve got to know where to go with the ball during certain coverage. That’s the biggest thing when it comes to playing quarterback in the NFL.”

He know the right questions to ask himself to improve.

NYCskinfan82 · 05-07-2012, 01:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by freddyg12

Shanny might say that he doesn't pay attention to the press & public reaction, and maybe he doesen't, but naming RGIII the starter so early seems in part designed to avoid any talk of qb controversy.

IMO MS knows RG3's shoulders can handle the weight, MS likes/loves how he carries himself.

NYCskinfan82 · 05-07-2012, 02:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SmootSmack

Should also be noted that it's 1st team offense vs. 2nd team defense, and 2nd team offense vs. 1st team defense

Yeah, I hope are #2 defense is not that much of a drop of from our #1 defense, same for the offense.

NYCskinfan82 · 05-07-2012, 02:14 PM

DC is a BIG Media Hub, they will keep asking the same question aswell as make up stories so just DEAD the whole thing and repeat RG3 period.

05-07-2012, 12:13 PM	#91
NC_Skins MVP Join Date: Nov 2010 Posts: 10,380	Re: RGIII Named Starter I'm not surprised by RGIII being the starter, but I am surprised that Shanahan has named him the starter before any OTAs or training camp. If you are going to go out, might as well do it in a blaze of glory.....or a giant big billow of smoke depending on the outcome. __________________ "So let me get this straight. We have the event of the year on TV with millions watching around the world... and people want a punt, pass, and kick competition to be the halftime entertainment?? Folks, don't quit your day jobs."- Matty

05-07-2012, 12:20 PM	#93
budw38 The Starter Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: Northern,Va. Posts: 2,380	Re: RGIII Named Starter looks like Grossman will not be inducted into the PF HOF after all ..... maybe 20 yrs from now RG3 will

05-07-2012, 12:38 PM	#96
firstdown Registered User Join Date: Oct 2004 Location: chesapeake, va Age: 50 Posts: 15,818	Re: RGIII Named Starter Did they really have to announce this and did anyone ever think Rex would start?

05-07-2012, 12:39 PM	#97
Mattyk ‎\m/ Join Date: Feb 2004 Age: 41 Posts: 80,425	Re: RGIII Named Starter Well it's not like Shanahan came out and declared him the starter. He was asked so he answered. No sense in making any drama out of it. __________________ Support The Warpath! \| Warpath Shop

05-07-2012, 12:52 PM	#98
skinsguy Pro Bowl Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: Greensboro, North Carolina Posts: 6,482	Re: RGIII Named Starter Actually the more interesting story will be who starts as the #2 guy. I mean, I think we all pretty much feel Grossman would be the backup, but I think Cousins might be good enough to beat Rex out of that spot. I'd say by next year, Cousins would have the #2 spot wrapped up. __________________ Not the same Skinsguy that posts on ES.

05-07-2012, 01:17 PM	#99
fanarchist Special Teams Join Date: Apr 2011 Posts: 106	Re: RGIII Named Starter I've read through this entire thread, and no one has addressed Mike implying 3 times, which should cause ones mind to gravitate toward the inference, that we could be employing some incarnation of the option. You're falling off.

05-07-2012, 01:21 PM	#100
SmootSmack Uncle Phil Join Date: Feb 2004 Posts: 44,584	Re: RGIII Named Starter Well it was mentioned in another thread...where it probably didn't belong. "You're falling off" What do you mean by that? __________________ You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You

05-07-2012, 01:41 PM	#102
SkinItup Special Teams Join Date: Jan 2011 Posts: 155	Re: RGIII Named Starter Reason number... let's say 212 why we all like Griffin. "Running the plays was another matter. It’s different when you know what routes you have on a certain play but you’ve got to know where to go with the ball during certain coverage. That’s the biggest thing when it comes to playing quarterback in the NFL.” He know the right questions to ask himself to improve.

05-07-2012, 02:14 PM	#105
NYCskinfan82 Playmaker Join Date: Feb 2008 Location: Queens, NYC Age: 44 Posts: 3,386	Re: RGIII Named Starter DC is a BIG Media Hub, they will keep asking the same question aswell as make up stories so just DEAD the whole thing and repeat RG3 period.

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

RGIII Named Starter

Redskins Locker Room