|
| |||||||
 |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
06-18-2012, 01:26 PM
| #1 | |
| Playmaker  Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 3,812
| The Redskins had NO TALENT when shanahan took over Ex-Redskins not thriving elsewhere Quote:
__________________ Dolphins get good press for saving drowning humans.But we only hear about the swimmers theyve pushed ashore.You know who we havent heard from: all the people theyve pushed out to sea.Dolphins dont know what theyre doing-they just like pushing things. | |
|  |
| Advertisements |
|
06-18-2012, 01:36 PM
| #2 |
| Franchise Player   Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 7,949
| Re: The Redskins had NO TALENT when shanahan took over And in other obvious observations Rich Tandler will be speaking about the sky being blue, grass is green and paint tends to dry slowly.
__________________ When life gives you paper jams, turn them into paper footballs! |
|
| |
|
06-18-2012, 01:44 PM
| #3 |
| Pro Bowl  Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 5,021
| Re: The Redskins had NO TALENT when shanahan took over That's a weird article. It starts with Rogers as the only guy, then mentions Rocky and Carter. Carter is a definite starter on any team. Rocky will probably start again but I'm happy he's gone. And why don't guys like Gaffney and Stallworth count?
__________________ Sometimes you eat the bear, and sometimes he eats you. |
|
| |
|
06-18-2012, 01:45 PM
| #4 |
| Playmaker  Join Date: Sep 2010 Location: Holland, Michigan
Posts: 3,861
| Re: The Redskins had NO TALENT when shanahan took over Thank you Mr. Tandler 
__________________ REDSKINS FAN SINCE 1968 CHARTER MEMEBER OF THE DALLAS SWEEPERS CLUB |
|
| |
|
06-18-2012, 01:51 PM
| #5 |
| Mann Up HOF!  Join Date: Sep 2008 Location: Hattiesburg, MS
Posts: 8,906
| Re: The Redskins had NO TALENT when shanahan took over The title of this thread seems to be hyperbole which goes beyond the specific claims of the article. CRed, here's some non-media hyperbole.
__________________ Rooting for the Dallas Cowboys should be recognized as a treatable mental disorder. |
|
| |
|
06-18-2012, 02:18 PM
| #6 | |
| Pro Bowl  Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: Greensboro, North Carolina
Posts: 5,999
| Re: The Redskins had NO TALENT when shanahan took over Quote:
__________________ Not the same Skinsguy that posts on ES. | |
|
| |
|
06-18-2012, 02:28 PM
| #7 | |
| Franchise Player Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 8,274
| Re: The Redskins had NO TALENT when shanahan took over Quote:
Carter isn't a starter in any 3-4 defense. Rocky start again? Only if a team is decimated with injuries.
__________________ "So let me get this straight. We have the event of the year on TV with millions watching around the world... and people want a punt, pass, and kick competition to be the halftime entertainment?? Folks, don't quit your day jobs."- Matty | |
| |
|
06-18-2012, 02:32 PM
| #8 |
| The Starter  Join Date: Oct 2009 Location: RatherbeinDC, TX
Posts: 1,995
| Re: The Redskins had NO TALENT when shanahan took over Wake me when rebuilding is over. 
__________________ But you know the sun's settin' fast, and just like they say, nothing good ever lasts. |
|
| |
|
06-18-2012, 02:51 PM
| #9 | |
| MVP  Join Date: Aug 2008 Location: Pasadena, Md Age: 45
Posts: 10,906
| Re: The Redskins had NO TALENT when shanahan took over Quote:
   | |
|
| |
|
06-18-2012, 03:06 PM
| #10 |
| Pro Bowl  Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 5,585
| Re: The Redskins had NO TALENT when shanahan took over its a slllllllllooooowwwwww offseason....count down till training camp....
__________________ When in doubt, go with the SEC |
|
| |
|
06-18-2012, 03:59 PM
| #11 |
| Living Legend  Join Date: Oct 2004 Location: chesapeake, va Age: 49
Posts: 15,189
| Re: The Redskins had NO TALENT when shanahan took over Didn't we let go Pierce and Stephen Davis because they wanted too much money. I know that's why we let go of Pierce but I cannot remember just why we let go of SD. So its not like we let them go and after seeing them thrive we realized we made a mistake. |
|
| |
|
06-18-2012, 09:13 PM
| #12 |
| The Starter  Join Date: Oct 2009 Location: Stephens City, VA
Posts: 1,716
| Re: The Redskins had NO TALENT when shanahan took over I wouldn't go as far as saying there was NO TALENT, but alot of guys we had starting when Shanahan arrived could not start elsewhere, probably much less make an NFL squad. I can think of a few guys offhand, others can help me add to this list: QB Jason Campbell: a redskins bust, Campbell was sent to the Raiders, where he was discarded in favor of then-retired QB Carson Palmer. Cut from the raiders, and now is a backup working on a one year deal in Chicago. RB Clinton Portis: Is now retired, after 3 straight injury plagued seasons. Even when Shanahan arrived, he was totally wore out and would have not made it anywhere else. WR Joey Galloway: It's sad when a 41 year old guy beat out a young player. Is now retired. OL Mike Williams: Overcame life threatening obesity to return to football, only to be out of football again from a serious heart condition. (no joke there his return was inspiring even though it was brief). Albert Haynesworth: Enough Said........
__________________ Time to nut up or shut up |
|
| |
|
06-18-2012, 11:02 PM
| #13 | |
| MVP  Join Date: Mar 2005 Location: NoVa Age: 24
Posts: 11,178
| Re: The Redskins had NO TALENT when shanahan took over Quote:
| |
|
| |
|
06-18-2012, 11:17 PM
| #14 | |
| Pro Bowl Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 5,021
| Re: The Redskins had NO TALENT when shanahan took over Quote:
__________________ Sometimes you eat the bear, and sometimes he eats you. | |
|
| |
|
06-18-2012, 11:30 PM
| #15 |
| \m/   Join Date: Feb 2004 Age: 40
Posts: 72,674
| Re: The Redskins had NO TALENT when shanahan took over If JC didn't get injured, the trade for Palmer wouldn't have happened. The Raiders didn't cut him either he was a free agent. |
|
| |
|
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |
Linear Mode
