Warpath  

Home | Forums | Salary Cap Info | Shop | Donate | Stay Connected




Go Back   Warpath > Redskins Forums > Redskins Locker Room


Moss for Coles (merged)

Redskins Locker Room


View Poll Results: Do you approve of the Santana Moss for L. Coles deal?
Yes 43 60.56%
No 28 39.44%
Voters: 71. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 02-25-2005, 12:49 PM   #46
Fight for old DC!
 
Redskins_P's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Falls Church, VA
Age: 36
Posts: 4,085
Re: Moss for Coles?

I really think the Vikings will pursue a free agent WR. If you look at that team, they're not really looking for a rookie WR to groom. I think they're looking for an experienced, proven WR. Also, they desperately need help on defense. The offense is fine even without Moss.
Redskins_P is offline   Reply With Quote

Advertisements
Old 02-25-2005, 12:58 PM   #47
Playmaker
 
celts32's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Hackettstown NJ
Age: 42
Posts: 2,656
Re: Moss for Coles?

I think I agree. I was worried at first that they would want a WR, but the more I think about it I think they will draft defense.
celts32 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-25-2005, 01:02 PM   #48
Fight for old DC!
 
Redskins_P's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Falls Church, VA
Age: 36
Posts: 4,085
Re: Moss for Coles?

Quote:
Originally Posted by celts32
I think I agree. I was worried at first that they would want a WR, but the more I think about it I think they will draft defense.

Well Celts, looks like I might be wrong on my assumption. This will not make you happy.

http://msn.foxsports.com/nfl/story/3417548


But remember this is a "mock" draft, and free agency hasn't started yet.
Redskins_P is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-25-2005, 01:17 PM   #49
Franchise Player
 
Sheriff Gonna Getcha's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 35
Posts: 8,317
Re: Moss for Coles?

Given the circumstances (Coles doesn't want to be here, Coles' toe, Moss is young, Moss has speed, and we need a wideout), I don't think this is a bad trade. It's true, Moss hasn't developed into a true #1 yet. It's true that Coles has already shown that he can be a monster when healthy. But, beggars can't be choosers.
Sheriff Gonna Getcha is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-25-2005, 01:33 PM   #50
Playmaker
 
Defensewins's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 2,838
Re: Moss for Coles?

I never really like S. Moss, even coming out of college. He remindes of another small WR that we drafted very high out of Michigan way back in the day. We do need a speed WR, but I want one with some size and strength. Plus I do not want my #1 or #2 WR returning kicks, he will never make through an entire season healthy.
One other thing about S. Moss is it seems that what ever WR that plays with Chad Pennington shows well and ends up with great numbers. I am not sure if S. Moss is a product of a good QB in a good system.
Defensewins is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-25-2005, 01:37 PM   #51
What will Shanny do this offseason?
 
diehardskin2982's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 3,318
Re: Moss for Coles?

I think the better trade would be for one unhappy player for another. So it would be John Abraham for Coles straight up. Coles is a top ten reciever in the league in a struggling offense, so he has enough value. otherwise I'd take the Ravens first for Coles
__________________
That got ugly fast
diehardskin2982 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-25-2005, 01:38 PM   #52
Camp Scrub
 
Funbunchfan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: connecticut
Age: 49
Posts: 47
Re: Moss for Coles?

I wanted Abraham!!!!!!!!!
Funbunchfan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-25-2005, 01:42 PM   #53
What will Shanny do this offseason?
 
diehardskin2982's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 3,318
Re: Moss for Coles?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Funbunchfan
I wanted Abraham!!!!!!!!!
we can still get him, remember we franchised Champ then traded him off. So it's a serious possibility.
__________________
That got ugly fast
diehardskin2982 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-25-2005, 02:04 PM   #54
Camp Scrub
 
Taylor Rules's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Richmond, VA
Posts: 8
Re: Moss for Coles?

I think Snyder just wanted to get a "Moss", and since the other one now resides in Oakland.......

But it is better than having to release Coles and get zilch in return.
Taylor Rules is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-25-2005, 02:12 PM   #55
Impact Rookie
 
CRT3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Rockville
Age: 51
Posts: 795
Re: Moss for Coles?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mattyk72
Even before this deal I think Morton's spot with the team was in jeopardy.
Along with his Avatar, PLEASE.

This is a great trade for us, and it adds another U guy.
__________________
16-0 for 2007
CRT3 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-25-2005, 02:30 PM   #56
‎\m/
 
Mattyk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 41
Posts: 80,440
Re: Moss for Coles?

Ughhhh
__________________
Support The Warpath! | Warpath Shop
Mattyk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-25-2005, 02:31 PM   #57
Impact Rookie
 
CRT3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Rockville
Age: 51
Posts: 795
Re: Moss for Coles?

Come on Matty just think Nike. You know the saying.
__________________
16-0 for 2007
CRT3 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-25-2005, 02:44 PM   #58
What will Shanny do this offseason?
 
diehardskin2982's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 3,318
Re: Moss for Coles?

Quote:
Originally Posted by CRT3
Come on Matty just think Nike. You know the saying.
i agree "just do it" Out with morton, in with thrash
__________________
That got ugly fast
diehardskin2982 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-25-2005, 02:51 PM   #59
Playmaker
 
celts32's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Hackettstown NJ
Age: 42
Posts: 2,656
Re: Moss for Coles?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Redskins_P
Well Celts, looks like I might be wrong on my assumption. This will not make you happy.

http://msn.foxsports.com/nfl/story/3417548


But remember this is a "mock" draft, and free agency hasn't started yet.
I don't put much faith in mock drafts. it's the easy assumption to assume that the Vikings will take a WR with the pick that they traded Moss for. i still think when it comes down to it they will address that horrible defense in the first round. If Mike Williams is not available at #9 I think that will be becasue someone else other than Minnesotta took him.
celts32 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-25-2005, 02:56 PM   #60
Camp Scrub
 
juggernaunt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 47
I Dont Like It

i do not like the idea coles 4 moss. i rather trade coles to either jets or ravens 4 picks. moss hasnt played up to his hype coming out of miami + i dont think he's played a full year. i say this cause multiple picks in the first round would help us more. with our pick we can take Willaims WR or Rolle, if we take a corner then we can grab a WR' with one of their 1st rounders. I said this in January we need a GODAMN GM and FIRE VINNY CERRATO. . did we not learn this past year especially on the DEF that names dont win games.
juggernaunt is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:03 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site is not officially affiliated with the Washington Redskins or the NFL.
Page generated in 0.28297 seconds with 10 queries

Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0 RC5

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25