Warpath  

Home | Forums | Salary Cap Info | Shop | Donate | Stay Connected




Go Back   Warpath > Redskins Forums > Redskins Locker Room


Redskins vs. Bengals Post Game Reaction

Redskins Locker Room


Reply
 
LinkBack (1) Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 09-26-2012, 07:21 AM   #691
The Starter
 
CrustyRedskin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: RatherbeinDC, TX
Posts: 2,399
Re: Redskins vs. Bengals Post Game Reaction

Quote:
Originally Posted by REDSKINS4ever View Post
The defense needs to get better. Bottom line. USC and Matt Barkley could torch the Redskins defense for sure.
Bama would but not USC.
__________________
I yearn......oh do I yearn, for a return to glory...
CrustyRedskin is offline   Reply With Quote

Advertisements
Old 09-26-2012, 09:54 AM   #692
Franchise Player
 
skinsfan69's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Arlington, VA.
Posts: 9,202
Re: Redskins vs. Bengals Post Game Reaction

Quote:
Originally Posted by SmootSmack View Post
You want me to bring up failed Beathard and Casserly picks as well? Because I can. Don't use the "you're a mod" excuse when I challenge your post. If you can't handle the debate find somewhere else to talk Redskins
Casserly had some stinkers on the draft side and free agent side from 93 until he left when Snyder took over.
skinsfan69 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-26-2012, 10:06 AM   #693
Living Legend
 
skinsfaninok's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Oklahoma City (Originally from Biloxi, Ms)
Age: 27
Posts: 16,024
Quote:
Originally Posted by CrustyRedskin View Post
Bama would but not USC.
No college offense could beat any NFL defense
__________________
THUNDER UP

"if you're good at something, never do it for free"- The Joker

skinsfaninok is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-26-2012, 10:29 AM   #694
You did WHAT?!?
 
EARTHQUAKE2689's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: In The Kitchen With Dyna.
Age: 25
Posts: 11,719
Re: Redskins vs. Bengals Post Game Reaction

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mattyk View Post
He weighed in at the combine at 223


But he hasn't seen him listed over 217. SMH.
__________________
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bpp3ycMvQd0

This is why you need Mentos. To justify your questionable problem solving skills.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z7geP5ev0VI

Awesome isn't it.
EARTHQUAKE2689 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-26-2012, 10:30 AM   #695
Living Legend
 
Monkeydad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: PA
Age: 34
Posts: 16,275
Re: Redskins vs. Bengals Post Game Reaction

Quote:
Originally Posted by EARTHQUAKE2689 View Post
I knew this already, but some people here needs their CPU taken away.
Strange that you only want to take out a single part of their computer. Why not the whole thing?
__________________
Not sent from a Droid, iPhone, Blackberry or toaster
Monkeydad is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-26-2012, 10:31 AM   #696
Living Legend
 
Monkeydad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: PA
Age: 34
Posts: 16,275
Re: Redskins vs. Bengals Post Game Reaction

Quote:
Originally Posted by CapitalDefense View Post
Remember we are all on the same side here.
We all want the Redskins to win football games.

You haven't been here long enough.


We have a few who don't.
__________________
Not sent from a Droid, iPhone, Blackberry or toaster
Monkeydad is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-26-2012, 10:54 AM   #697
Contains football related knowledge
 
JoeRedskin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Second Star On The Right
Age: 51
Posts: 8,398
Re: Redskins vs. Bengals Post Game Reaction

Quote:
Originally Posted by DirtBagZ View Post
You want to rip my post have it! Those guys are all garbage and just symptomatic of the overall poor drafting by this team ever since Bobby Beathard and Charley Casserly left town. You want to have your rose colored, or in this case burgundy-n-gold, glasses and all is well and the skins can do no wrong and Redskins management can do no wrong, have at it. Your the mod, your forum, your rules, got it!
I broke it dowwn a couple years ago so it may have changed, but, essentially, we were hitting on our draft picks with the same success rate that NE was. Pre-Shanallem, we traded picks away like they were going out of style so even though the success rate was similar, we had fewer players to show for it.

Considering that under Shanallen, we have drafted 27 players since Shanallen got here, and only 2 of those guys are no longer in the NFL, I would suggest that from a draft perspective, we have seen a sea change in the way this team is being built. Does it continue? We'll see. Will translate into a change on the field. Hopefully. Given the youth movement beginning in 2010, I would hope we see the transition this year.

It's game three. We have a tough schedule and real issues on the line and defensive backfield. At the same time, we have youth at both positions (Gomes, Bernstein, Crawford, Gettis, Compton, LeRibeus, Hurt). Does it develop? Hope so.

But it's the Skins so, if we cut them, they will inevitably be superstars elsewhere. Good thing we have had home grown talent to sustain us like London Fletcher, Santana Moss, Steve Bowen ... oh, wait.
__________________
You aren't worth the water in my spit but, maybe, just maybe, you're worth the lead in my shotgun.
JoeRedskin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-26-2012, 11:04 AM   #698
New HC, new hope!
 
RedskinRat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: I'm in LA, trick!
Posts: 8,576
Re: Redskins vs. Bengals Post Game Reaction

Quote:
Originally Posted by DirtBagZ View Post
Gee let's see 6-10, 5-11, now off to a 1-2 start, with one of the worst defenses in the NFL
Dude, calm down.....


Quote:
Originally Posted by DirtBagZ View Post
and dependent entirely upon our extremely talented QB in order to have any offence at all. Which the geniuses running the show that is Kyle, and Mike, just spelling it out for you so don't miss the frigging point, clearly are intent on getting the kid killed with idiotic playing calling of let him take 20 -30 hits a game. Why do you think RBs only last till age 30 in this league?
So they are to blame for the injuries from dirty hits too? Otay......

Quote:
Originally Posted by DirtBagZ View Post
Shanahan is a grade A prick, and a liar, afterall he is the one at the podium, and I quote, "I stake my reputation on it" that Rex Grossman and John Beck can play in this league, how exactly did that work out?
A lot better than him going out and saying "We can't win with these guys"[/QUOTE]

Quote:
Originally Posted by DirtBagZ View Post
Here we are year three, and same major issues, no depth on the o-line, and now a problematic secondary. Yet again our major free agents not exactly working out this season, not knocking Garcon, but he is needed in the worst possible way, if this foot injury ends up being a chronic thing, and as a fan I pray that it is not, are we going to have another Jamal Brown on our hands?
It is never going to be an immediate improvement.

Quote:
Originally Posted by DirtBagZ View Post
With respect to Clemons, and obviously nobody reads anything if it is long, I pointed out he bounced around the league. But there is a trend and no one can deny this that ex-Redskins go elsewhere and thrive, and just to make it clear for the recent era: Antonio Pierce, Ryan Clark, Champ Bailey, Carlos Rogers, Rheingold now at Buffalo and so on, I am sure there are plenty more examples.
Pierce was with us for one season? When Rogers was here everyone bitched he couldn't catch, Bailey had to leave, etc....

I don't see a trend any more than with other teams. Some leave and do well, other don't.

Quote:
Originally Posted by DirtBagZ View Post
So if anyone needs to stop smoking the funny stuff, it is you son.
Son?
RedskinRat is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 09-26-2012, 11:08 AM   #699
The Starter
 
REDSKINS4ever's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Born and raised in D.C.....but I'm a New Yorker now....
Posts: 2,102
Re: Redskins vs. Bengals Post Game Reaction

Quote:
Originally Posted by skinsfaninok View Post
No college offense could beat any NFL defense
How could you be so sure about that? Some NFL defenses are pretty mediocre, like last season's New England Patriots squad that finished 32nd in defense. I can see Stanford, Baylor, Texas, Oklahoma, and USC lighting up that Patriots defense. The difference between the NCAA and the NFL is the speed of the game. But RG3 would hit Kendall Wright all day long on Belichick's pathetic Patriots defense.
REDSKINS4ever is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-26-2012, 11:10 AM   #700
‎\m/
 
Mattyk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 41
Posts: 79,503
Re: Redskins vs. Bengals Post Game Reaction

Men against boys, simple as that. The NFL is so much faster and complex.
__________________
Support The Warpath! | Warpath Shop
Mattyk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-26-2012, 11:10 AM   #701
Contains football related knowledge
 
JoeRedskin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Second Star On The Right
Age: 51
Posts: 8,398
Re: Redskins vs. Bengals Post Game Reaction

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mechanix544 View Post
Seriously m8, I know you are a smart guy, but trying to argue just for the sake of arguing.................

You cannot sit there and spin it that RG3 is just as safe running the double and triple option than if he weren't. You cannot make the arguement that having 11 or more rushes per game with a 210 lb 6'1'' QB is smart if you are thinking about breaking in the rookie slow and steady. RG3 is getting absolutely CRUSHED out there, and noone can say he isn't. Yes we are not coaches, but it doesn't take a coach to see that one of these times, he isn't getting up if this continues week in and week out. We paid a RIDICULOUS amount to get this guy, seriously. Just look at the Nationals and Strasburg. They won't let the guy throw over 150 innings. Its called protecting your investment. RG3 isn't bulletproof, and has had some injuries in the past. It would be foolish to think that at this current pace, he can finish out a season healthy and just fine.

Just saying that the coaches are really rolling the dice, after we gave up two additional #1's and a #2. Thats alot to risk to have your 210 lb rookie QB be your qb, as well as your rushing threat, taking on MLB's and 265 lb defensive ends every other play.
Look, I am not suggesting RGIII is not getting hit - a lot - and reading Keim this week, it is likely he is getting hit more than he would in a normal drop back set. At the same time, while their is risk from this, I also see the benefit from having him run the option. You, and others, seem to (1) think that their is no benefit from running the option offense; and/or (2) if any benefit exists, it is far outweighed by the risk posed to RGIII's long term health.

As to (1), I dispute it for all the reasons previously stated by myself and others.

As to (2), while I originally strongly disagreed with this, I am not as sure of it now. I still think the option offense is the right thing now for RGIII, but believe we need to find a way to cut down on his hits. According to KEim, he took 10 hits while running or w/out the ball while running the option including one solid hit. (At the same time, he was sacked six times and hit passing 11 times - the bottom line is, with our line, he is going to be hit a lot). That number needs to go down, how? not sure. Trashing the offensive design and starting from ground zero, however, strikes me as not the best plan either.
__________________
You aren't worth the water in my spit but, maybe, just maybe, you're worth the lead in my shotgun.
JoeRedskin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-26-2012, 11:21 AM   #702
Contains football related knowledge
 
JoeRedskin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Second Star On The Right
Age: 51
Posts: 8,398
Re: Redskins vs. Bengals Post Game Reaction

Quote:
Originally Posted by skinsfan69 View Post
Casserly had some stinkers on the draft side and free agent side from 93 until he left when Snyder took over.
Don't kid yourself, so did Beathard (anyone remember Carl Powell, Richard Williams, Bob Slater, Steve Hamilton - didn't think so. 2nd and 3rd round duds from the early 80's).

Guys go on to success on other teams all the time - Cris Carter anyone? Warren Moon? Steve Largent?
__________________
You aren't worth the water in my spit but, maybe, just maybe, you're worth the lead in my shotgun.
JoeRedskin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-26-2012, 12:06 PM   #703
Registered User
 
The Goat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 5,662
Re: Redskins vs. Bengals Post Game Reaction

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mattyk View Post
He weighed in at the combine at 223
Thanks Matty, hadn't seen that before. And it's not like RG3 couldn't pack on some pounds (muscle), but it would likely slow him down a bit. I love his speed and agility, and don't really think he needs to be any heavier. The real issue is the pounding, so I hope they find a way to limit the hits.
The Goat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-26-2012, 12:14 PM   #704
Living Legend
 
skinsfaninok's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Oklahoma City (Originally from Biloxi, Ms)
Age: 27
Posts: 16,024
Quote:
Originally Posted by REDSKINS4ever View Post
How could you be so sure about that? Some NFL defenses are pretty mediocre, like last season's New England Patriots squad that finished 32nd in defense. I can see Stanford, Baylor, Texas, Oklahoma, and USC lighting up that Patriots defense. The difference between the NCAA and the NFL is the speed of the game. But RG3 would hit Kendall Wright all day long on Belichick's pathetic Patriots defense.
No chance man, those are kids, and the NFL are grown men. You need to remember that the game is way faster and all of the players are elite level football players. In college not all of the players are on that same level.
__________________
THUNDER UP

"if you're good at something, never do it for free"- The Joker

skinsfaninok is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-26-2012, 12:15 PM   #705
Uncle Phil
 
SmootSmack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 44,502
Re: Redskins vs. Bengals Post Game Reaction

https://www.profootballfocus.com/blo...k-week-3-2012/
__________________
You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You
SmootSmack is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:04 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site is not officially affiliated with the Washington Redskins or the NFL.
Page generated in 0.31426 seconds with 10 queries

Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0 RC5

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25