Redskins vs. Bengals Post Game Reaction

takethecake · 09-23-2012, 04:56 PM

Also I still can't believe the refs didn't call PI against the bengals on that bomb to Hankerson. Or that they called a phantom facemask against D Hall. Probably wouldn't have changed the outcome, but the officiating was disappointing again.

And also easy to say in hindsight, but I would have gone for it on 4th and inches. Our interior o-line was getting good pushes, and Morris has shown an ability to convert in those situations.

Don't like the punishment RG3 was taking. Less college ball please. There are other ways of getting the opposing pass rushers to back off (screens? HB draws?)

Mattyk · 09-23-2012, 04:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GusFrerotte

They are going to get worked and the secondary will be priority #1 in the offseason. Everyone in the secondary that is up for contract renewal should be let loose or brought back at a lower pay rate. At least 3 of our draftees should be def backfield guys from the SEC. I am assuming 6-10 to 8-8 will garner a top 9-14 pick, so we should get a gamer for sure.

You do remember what we gave up for RG3 right?

punch it in · 09-23-2012, 04:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dirtbag59

BUt it works in Madden.

I dont play madden. I do play the odds. Odds are BETTER that our offense was going to get two feet than that our defense was going to stop them. I dont think that is so crazy. At all.

Mattyk · 09-23-2012, 04:58 PM

I'd like to see the option stuff start to get phased out. Griffin is taking too many shots.

DynamiteRave · 09-23-2012, 04:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mooby

As far as our defense goes, I'm not sure what we'd rather have. Haslett's defense has been down, up, and now down so far in the 3 seasons he's been our d-coordinator. Gregg Williams/Blache's defense were consistently good for the most part, but we never forced turnovers. Now that we've had both, what do people prefer?

Is it better to have a shitty defense capable of forcing turnovers, or a solid/good defense that doesn't force any turnovers? I'm leaning toward the latter right now. Look at what the Rams did today against a good Bears defense, versus what they did against us last week. If we a solid defense that didn't force a lot of turnovers, I think games would be closer than they have this season. Obviously against the Saints that worked in our favor, but these last two games our defense has been manhandled all game.

... Can't I have both?

Dirtbag59 · 09-23-2012, 04:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mooby

As far as our defense goes, I'm not sure what we'd rather have. Haslett's defense has been down, up, and now down so far in the 3 seasons he's been our d-coordinator. Gregg Williams/Blache's defense were consistently good for the most part, but we never forced turnovers. Now that we've had both, what do people prefer?

Is it better to have a shitty defense capable of forcing turnovers, or a solid/good defense that doesn't force any turnovers? I'm leaning toward the latter right now. Look at what the Rams did today against a good Bears defense, versus what they did against us last week. If we a solid defense that didn't force a lot of turnovers, I think games would be closer than they have this season. Obviously against the Saints that worked in our favor, but these last two games our defense has been manhandled all game.

Bears defense was in God mode today. They held DANNY AMENDOLAIEHRFD to 66 yards receiving!

SmootSmack · 09-23-2012, 04:59 PM

So punch it in, you get out of FedEx before the escalators started malfunctioning?

DynamiteRave · 09-23-2012, 05:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dirtbag59

Bears defense was in God mode today. They held DANNY AMENDOLAIEHRFD to 66 yards receiving!

lol. Nice one.

TheMalcolmConnection · 09-23-2012, 05:03 PM

Was pleased with run defense today.

NOT pleased with yet another key injury. TW doesn't play defense, but that most certainly contributed to us not scoring more. Black got OWNED.

skinsfan69 · 09-23-2012, 05:03 PM

I think the fans and the media got a litte ahead of themselves after the Saints win. This team still has a ways to go.

skinsfaninok · 09-23-2012, 05:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mattyk

I'd like to see the option stuff start to get phased out. Griffin is taking too many shots.

he'll get hurt taking hits like that

punch it in · 09-23-2012, 05:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SmootSmack

So punch it in, you get out of FedEx before the escalators started malfunctioning?

I dont have the luxury of using the escalators. I sit in the top row when i go usually. Lol.

mooby · 09-23-2012, 05:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DynamiteRave

... Can't I have both?

NO.

Under no circumstances will having an elite defense that also forces turnovers be allowed.

SBXVII · 09-23-2012, 05:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DynamiteRave

I can't even blame the whole defense. The LBs have been playing basically lights out.

I honestly can't figure out what's wrong with the defense this year. They're basically the same defense from last year save a few moves here and there. But somehow we've gone from 13th ranked last year to currently 28th.

I think the thought process was if we can get a really good DL to push the pocket or rush the QB then the back end really won't matter. however they did address the Safety spot but ended up with two players who are injured. Go figure.

punch it in · 09-23-2012, 05:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mattyk

I'd like to see the option stuff start to get phased out. Griffin is taking too many shots.

Agreed but man him and banks are a fast one two punch on those.

09-23-2012, 04:56 PM	#61
takethecake Special Teams Join Date: Feb 2009 Location: Clarksville, MD Age: 24 Posts: 266	Re: Redskins vs. Bengals Post Game Reaction Also I still can't believe the refs didn't call PI against the bengals on that bomb to Hankerson. Or that they called a phantom facemask against D Hall. Probably wouldn't have changed the outcome, but the officiating was disappointing again. And also easy to say in hindsight, but I would have gone for it on 4th and inches. Our interior o-line was getting good pushes, and Morris has shown an ability to convert in those situations. Don't like the punishment RG3 was taking. Less college ball please. There are other ways of getting the opposing pass rushers to back off (screens? HB draws?)

09-23-2012, 04:58 PM	#64
Mattyk ‎\m/ Join Date: Feb 2004 Age: 40 Posts: 72,652	Re: Redskins vs. Bengals Post Game Reaction I'd like to see the option stuff start to get phased out. Griffin is taking too many shots. __________________ Support The Warpath! \| Warpath Shop

09-23-2012, 04:59 PM	#67
SmootSmack Mad Men Join Date: Feb 2004 Posts: 43,095	Re: Redskins vs. Bengals Post Game Reaction So punch it in, you get out of FedEx before the escalators started malfunctioning? __________________ You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You

09-23-2012, 05:03 PM	#69
TheMalcolmConnection I like big (_\|_)s. Join Date: Dec 2004 Location: Lexington, Virginia Age: 31 Posts: 17,118	Re: Redskins vs. Bengals Post Game Reaction Was pleased with run defense today. NOT pleased with yet another key injury. TW doesn't play defense, but that most certainly contributed to us not scoring more. Black got OWNED. __________________ Regret nothing. At one time it was exactly what you wanted.

09-23-2012, 05:03 PM	#70
skinsfan69 Franchise Player Join Date: Oct 2006 Location: Arlington, VA. Posts: 8,103	Re: Redskins vs. Bengals Post Game Reaction I think the fans and the media got a litte ahead of themselves after the Saints win. This team still has a ways to go.

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

Redskins vs. Bengals Post Game Reaction

Redskins Locker Room