2013 Free Agents

GMScud · 03-01-2013, 12:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SFREDSKIN

Best article I've read and so accurate, that it feels like I wrote it.

Agreed. Can't stand the dude. He's an overpaid, washed up, hot-headed, loud-mouthed, finger pointing, me-first jerk with no sense of accountability for his routinely piss-poor play. Show him the door. We can get someone younger, harder working, more humble, and most importantly, much less expensive than this headache.

Mattyk · 03-01-2013, 12:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Skinzman

Meh... I got to weeks 3 and 4, and realized this guy was going to blame Dhall for his own milk spoiling after he forgot to get it out of his trunk after a grocery trip and it sat there for 3 weeks.

I agree that he is overpaid and should be cut, will not care one bit if it happens. But he was clearly covering a different receiver in week 3. He came off of that to try to catch AJ Green (who had single coverage on a safety). Week 4, you never, and I mean never, put an elite outside receiver one on one late in a game where you are holding the lead. The ball missed his hand by several inches and it took a diving catch by Vincent Jackson. Darrelle Revis wasnt stopping that one. The only thing that was stopping that one would have been a safety over the top. One that actually understands what over the top means, so that automatically rules out M. Williams and R. Doughty.

If we take the worst play of every game for every player, and judge them only on that. Do we have a single player ever in the history of the NFL that would rate as a good player?

Keep in mind he's also working on an article giving the opposite perspective, the case for D-Hall. Although I'm sure that one will be much shorter and probably a lot harder to write.

SirLK26 · 03-01-2013, 12:30 PM

Haters, haters. Why cut a guy that leads the team in INT's?

Mattyk · 03-01-2013, 12:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SirLK26

Haters, haters. Why cut a guy that leads the team in INT's?

Because he's making way too much $$ and isn't that good to begin with?

Mattyk · 03-01-2013, 12:45 PM

Bills franchise Jairus Byrd | ProFootballTalk

Ruhskins · 03-01-2013, 12:45 PM

I think in order for Hall to stay he needs to take a pay cut period. Otherwise it would be economically sound for the team to get rid of him.

In terms of production, he is ridiculously inconsistent and whether he stays or not, the team should be looking to upgrade. Although, the same can be said of the entire secondary ; and I still stand by my belief that the secondary won't be successful until we find a decent Free Safety.

Since I don't have the boner-inducing hatred for Hall, I don't think the team should get rid of him "just because". If he was as terrible (in all aspects) as some people here cry about, the team would have gotten rid of him a long time ago.

Bubba305-ST21- · 03-01-2013, 12:48 PM

Say all you want about d hall, yes he is overpaid yes he takes chances on ints. IMO the bottom line is this he played well down the stretch, how can we just cut the guy with no replacement?? who would be a starter across from Wilson? Crawford? don't mind cutting him but the player to take is place is a huge ?

SFREDSKIN · 03-01-2013, 01:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SirLK26

Haters, haters. Why cut a guy that leads the team in INT's?

And bonehead personal fouls.

SirLK26 · 03-01-2013, 01:34 PM

Whatever. Yes, he needs to take a pay cut, not just a restructuring, but the more our offense has the ball the better.

Mattyk · 03-01-2013, 01:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bubba305-ST21-

Say all you want about d hall, yes he is overpaid yes he takes chances on ints. IMO the bottom line is this he played well down the stretch, how can we just cut the guy with no replacement?? who would be a starter across from Wilson? Crawford? don't mind cutting him but the player to take is place is a huge ?

That's what free agency and the draft is for.

Bubba305-ST21- · 03-01-2013, 02:00 PM

nobody on our roster is a better replacement than Hall. he is better than anyone other than Wilson. that being said he def needs to take a paycut but I don't trust anyone else on our team to start and do not trust a rookie cb to start if we even use our 2nd considering we need a safety bad. I say make him take a pay cut and keep him! he played good down the stretch and better then anything else we got

Bubba305-ST21- · 03-01-2013, 02:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mattyk

That's what free agency and the draft is for.

yeahhhh but we do not have much money to play with and nobody we can afford sticks out to me being clearly better than hall

Mattyk · 03-01-2013, 02:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bubba305-ST21-

yeahhhh but we do not have much money to play with and nobody we can afford sticks out to me being clearly better than hall

You really think the market for corners is that bare?

Cutting him saves us about $8 and that move alone would put us under the cap by about $4M.

mredskins · 03-01-2013, 02:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mattyk

You really think the market for corners is that bare?

Cutting him saves us about $8 and that move alone would put us under the cap by about $4M.

I be shocked if he is back. He doesn't really bother I always looked at him as a expensive stop gap.

Bubba305-ST21- · 03-01-2013, 02:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mattyk

You really think the market for corners is that bare?

Cutting him saves us about $8 and that move alone would put us under the cap by about $4M.

I just didn't see anyone that really lit my fire that we would be able to afford I like the draft route better but just reluctant to start a corner his first year other then nickel unless he's top tier which I doubt we can get out hands on. idk I just think keeping hall cheaper around for 1 more year or so would be good for us until we get a better option. just my thinking, we will see

03-01-2013, 12:30 PM	#723
SirLK26 Special Teams Join Date: Jan 2013 Location: South Texas Posts: 151	Re: 2013 Free Agents Haters, haters. Why cut a guy that leads the team in INT's? __________________ Football isn't just a game; it's a way of life.

03-01-2013, 12:45 PM	#725
Mattyk ‎\m/ Join Date: Feb 2004 Age: 40 Posts: 72,739	Re: 2013 Free Agents Bills franchise Jairus Byrd \| ProFootballTalk __________________ Support The Warpath! \| Warpath Shop

03-01-2013, 12:45 PM	#726
Ruhskins Gamebreaker Join Date: Jan 2008 Location: Columbia, MD Age: 34 Posts: 14,593	Re: 2013 Free Agents I think in order for Hall to stay he needs to take a pay cut period. Otherwise it would be economically sound for the team to get rid of him. In terms of production, he is ridiculously inconsistent and whether he stays or not, the team should be looking to upgrade. Although, the same can be said of the entire secondary ; and I still stand by my belief that the secondary won't be successful until we find a decent Free Safety. Since I don't have the boner-inducing hatred for Hall, I don't think the team should get rid of him "just because". If he was as terrible (in all aspects) as some people here cry about, the team would have gotten rid of him a long time ago. __________________ R.I.P. #21 New words created on The Warpath: Rewalsr - Somretimes - Fualt - Jersesy - Itiot - Composetory Afeard - Storgn - Empliment - Gaissn - Saftys - Minnisota Faviort - Hatter - Phsyched - Foof - Heloing - Brutual Stroried Check out this cool local internet radio show Weds 7-9pm: The DC Sports Chat I sense an annoyance in the Force

03-01-2013, 12:48 PM	#727
Bubba305-ST21- Impact Rookie Join Date: Apr 2008 Age: 25 Posts: 672	Re: 2013 Free Agents Say all you want about d hall, yes he is overpaid yes he takes chances on ints. IMO the bottom line is this he played well down the stretch, how can we just cut the guy with no replacement?? who would be a starter across from Wilson? Crawford? don't mind cutting him but the player to take is place is a huge ? __________________ never another.....R.I.P. Sean T #21

03-01-2013, 01:34 PM	#729
SirLK26 Special Teams Join Date: Jan 2013 Location: South Texas Posts: 151	Re: 2013 Free Agents Whatever. Yes, he needs to take a pay cut, not just a restructuring, but the more our offense has the ball the better. __________________ Football isn't just a game; it's a way of life.

03-01-2013, 02:00 PM	#731
Bubba305-ST21- Impact Rookie Join Date: Apr 2008 Age: 25 Posts: 672	Re: 2013 Free Agents nobody on our roster is a better replacement than Hall. he is better than anyone other than Wilson. that being said he def needs to take a paycut but I don't trust anyone else on our team to start and do not trust a rookie cb to start if we even use our 2nd considering we need a safety bad. I say make him take a pay cut and keep him! he played good down the stretch and better then anything else we got __________________ never another.....R.I.P. Sean T #21

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

2013 Free Agents

Redskins Locker Room