Warpath  

Home | Forums | Salary Cap Info | Shop | Donate | Stay Connected




Go Back   Warpath > Redskins Forums > Redskins Locker Room


Should Billy Cundiff still be cut!

Redskins Locker Room


Closed Thread
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 10-09-2012, 12:51 PM   #256
Playmaker
 
artmonkforhallofamein07's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Charleston , SC
Posts: 4,694
Re: Should Billy Cundiff still be cut!

Rackers or Forbath so... 5 and 6

Pretty neat trick there Los.

Would prefer youth.
__________________
Robert Griffin III welcome to the Washington Redskins!

Year 1 - NFC EAST Champions at 10-6

Year 2 - 3-10... Benched 14 weeks to late.....

Year 3 - Pure Awesomeness!!

http://site.fandangoracinginc.com/
artmonkforhallofamein07 is offline  

Advertisements
Old 10-09-2012, 12:52 PM   #257
‎\m/
 
Mattyk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 41
Posts: 81,987
Re: Should Billy Cundiff still be cut!

I'm kinda surprised Rackers isn't getting a look today, but I guess they already determined he's not their guy from training camp.
__________________
Support The Warpath! | Warpath Shop
Mattyk is offline  
Old 10-09-2012, 12:55 PM   #258
MVP
 
Chico23231's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Richmond, VA
Age: 37
Posts: 11,762
Re: Should Billy Cundiff still be cut!

i just want the guy whose not gonna cause me to throw my remote
__________________
Ditka for President
Chico23231 is offline  
Old 10-09-2012, 12:55 PM   #259
Franchise Player
 
FRPLG's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Age: 35
Posts: 9,958
Re: Should Billy Cundiff still be cut!

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chico23231 View Post
i just want the guy whose not gonna cause me to throw my remote
There are like 5 of them...and they're taken. The rest are all about the same.
FRPLG is offline  
Old 10-09-2012, 12:56 PM   #260
Gamebreaker
 
CRedskinsRule's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Pasadena, Md
Age: 47
Posts: 12,772
Re: Should Billy Cundiff still be cut!

Quote:
Originally Posted by BigHairedAristocrat View Post
Well thats not what Chris Said on ESPN980.

Check the ESPN980 Audio Vault - 10/7/2012 Chris Russell Post Game and start listening around the 6 minute mark.

Al Michaels: Would Shanahan bring him (Cundiff) back? Do you think he'd swallow his pride and..

Russell: No, i dont think he will, because i dont think Mike likes him very much

Al : Do you know why that is? What is it that he specifically doesnt like about him?

Chris: i know some things. Hes frustrated with his consistency... and then there's other elements to it that i'm not quite sure if that, you know, necessarily belongs in this forum, but you know - Graham is a very religious person and i've heard some things that that irked some people. So you know, there's something to that i beleive. I don't know that absolutely 100% for sure, and i dont want to accuse somebody of something, but that is what i was told.
Maybe I am wrong, but the quote you put here in no way equals your earlier statement

Quote:
Originally Posted by BigHairedAristocrat View Post
Chris Russell and rich tandler have both been on espn980 and essentially said shanahan got rid of gano because he was openly religious and it put a lot of players off.
The actual airtime quote as you have it, says that Gano's inaccuracy was a primary source of their frustration and other factors may have made the decision more palatable. Your interpreted quote makes it sound like the openly religious issue was essentially why Shanahan got rid of Gano.

I don't see how the airtime quote you used in anyway equates to the statement you attributed to it.
__________________
Dirtbag59, sending songs to oblivion 1 writer at a time.
CRedskinsRule is offline  
Old 10-09-2012, 12:57 PM   #261
Playmaker
 
los panda's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: los angeles, ca
Age: 29
Posts: 4,093
Re: Should Billy Cundiff still be cut!

Quote:
Originally Posted by artmonkforhallofamein07 View Post
Rackers or Forbath so... 5 and 6

Pretty neat trick there Los.

Would prefer youth.
thanks, artie. i think smoot is right about brown, but i favor forbath.
__________________
7 9 21 28 33 42 43 44 49 65 70 81
los panda is online now  
Old 10-09-2012, 01:01 PM   #262
MVP
 
Chico23231's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Richmond, VA
Age: 37
Posts: 11,762
Re: Should Billy Cundiff still be cut!

the arguement that Shanny would get rid of a guy because he is religious the utterly idiotic. If he would do his job and make kicks, he'd still be here.
__________________
Ditka for President
Chico23231 is offline  
Old 10-09-2012, 01:01 PM   #263
Gamebreaker
 
CRedskinsRule's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Pasadena, Md
Age: 47
Posts: 12,772
Re: Should Billy Cundiff still be cut!

I don't know about salary cap, but could we keep cundiff as a kickoff specialist, get the young guy in for FG's, and cut someone else? Not sure if it works, but seems like some other teams have done that.
__________________
Dirtbag59, sending songs to oblivion 1 writer at a time.
CRedskinsRule is offline  
Old 10-09-2012, 01:05 PM   #264
Playmaker
 
los panda's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: los angeles, ca
Age: 29
Posts: 4,093
Re: Should Billy Cundiff still be cut!

Quote:
Originally Posted by CRedskinsRule View Post
I don't know about salary cap, but could we keep cundiff as a kickoff specialist, get the young guy in for FG's, and cut someone else? Not sure if it works, but seems like some other teams have done that.
i was thinking about that, it made me pose this question: when we cut sellers and went from 2 to 1 fb, what position did that roster spot go to? my guess would be wr, but idk.

so basically, if there's room in the cap, who would you cut?
__________________
7 9 21 28 33 42 43 44 49 65 70 81
los panda is online now  
Old 10-09-2012, 01:18 PM   #265
Living Legend
 
Ruhskins's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 16,111
Re: Should Billy Cundiff still be cut!

Quote:
Originally Posted by CRedskinsRule View Post
I don't know about salary cap, but could we keep cundiff as a kickoff specialist, get the young guy in for FG's, and cut someone else? Not sure if it works, but seems like some other teams have done that.
I think the Falcons did that either last year or the year before that.
__________________
R.I.P. #21

New words created on The Warpath:
Rewalsr - Somretimes - Fualt - Jersesy - Itiot - Composetory
Afeard - Storgn - Empliment - Gaissn - Saftys - Minnisota
Faviort - Hatter - Phsyched - Foof - Heloing - Brutual
Stroried

"Give an opinion and move on. Your life doesn't depend on winning the internet." -FRPLG
Ruhskins is offline  
Old 10-09-2012, 01:32 PM   #266
Registered User
 
BigHairedAristocrat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 3,917
Re: Should Billy Cundiff still be cut!

Quote:
Originally Posted by CRedskinsRule View Post
Maybe I am wrong, but the quote you put here in no way equals your earlier statement



The actual airtime quote as you have it, says that Gano's inaccuracy was a primary source of their frustration and other factors may have made the decision more palatable. Your interpreted quote makes it sound like the openly religious issue was essentially why Shanahan got rid of Gano.

I don't see how the airtime quote you used in anyway equates to the statement you attributed to it.
Did you listen to it? If not, i suggest you listen to it, listen to voice inflections and tell me what you think.

In this interview, he mentions accuracy as it relates to directional kickoffs. In earlier interviews in the past few weeks on Skins at 1, he's repeatedly insinuated this is stupid because skins arent doing directional kickoffs this year. They just want to kick it out of the end zone so it cant be returned. In other intervews, Russell has stated the Skins told Gano they didnt blame him for any of the blocked kicks last year. He was 15 of his last 16. He's conistent.

I listen to redskins radio every day and Russells been expressing confusion regarding the skins decision to go with Cundiff over Gano since the move happens. Chris says he talks to Gano every day and openly admits he is baised in his favor. For weeks, Russell has indicated the reason the Skins cut Gano were largely personal and that Shanahan doesnt like him at all. However, he never elaborated until Sunday, which is why i mentioned it here.
BigHairedAristocrat is offline  
Old 10-09-2012, 01:40 PM   #267
Gamebreaker
 
CRedskinsRule's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Pasadena, Md
Age: 47
Posts: 12,772
Re: Should Billy Cundiff still be cut!

Quote:
Originally Posted by BigHairedAristocrat View Post
Did you listen to it? If not, i suggest you listen to it, listen to voice inflections and tell me what you think.

In this interview, he mentions accuracy as it relates to directional kickoffs. In earlier interviews in the past few weeks on Skins at 1, he's repeatedly insinuated this is stupid because skins arent doing directional kickoffs this year. They just want to kick it out of the end zone so it cant be returned. In other intervews, Russell has stated the Skins told Gano they didnt blame him for any of the blocked kicks last year. He was 15 of his last 16. He's conistent.

I listen to redskins radio every day and Russells been expressing confusion regarding the skins decision to go with Cundiff over Gano since the move happens. Chris says he talks to Gano every day and openly admits he is baised in his favor. For weeks, Russell has indicated the reason the Skins cut Gano were largely personal and that Shanahan doesnt like him at all. However, he never elaborated until Sunday, which is why i mentioned it here.
Gotcha, not going to go back and listen to it, because even as you have laid it all out I don't see anything that makes me feel the need too. As later tweets said, and per SS directly asking, CR has said that was not his intent.
__________________
Dirtbag59, sending songs to oblivion 1 writer at a time.
CRedskinsRule is offline  
Closed Thread

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:03 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site is not officially affiliated with the Washington Redskins or the NFL.
Page generated in 0.31709 seconds with 9 queries

Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0 RC5

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25