Warpath  

Home | Forums | Salary Cap Info | Shop | Donate | Stay Connected




Go Back   Warpath > Redskins Forums > Redskins Locker Room


Should Billy Cundiff still be cut!

Redskins Locker Room


Closed Thread
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 10-09-2012, 02:05 PM   #271
Playmaker
 
los panda's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: los angeles, ca
Age: 29
Posts: 4,182
Re: Should Billy Cundiff still be cut!

Quote:
Originally Posted by CRedskinsRule View Post
I don't know about salary cap, but could we keep cundiff as a kickoff specialist, get the young guy in for FG's, and cut someone else? Not sure if it works, but seems like some other teams have done that.
i was thinking about that, it made me pose this question: when we cut sellers and went from 2 to 1 fb, what position did that roster spot go to? my guess would be wr, but idk.

so basically, if there's room in the cap, who would you cut?
__________________
7 9 21 28 33 42 43 44 49 65 70 81
los panda is offline  

Advertisements
Old 10-09-2012, 02:18 PM   #272
Living Legend
 
Ruhskins's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 16,406
Re: Should Billy Cundiff still be cut!

Quote:
Originally Posted by CRedskinsRule View Post
I don't know about salary cap, but could we keep cundiff as a kickoff specialist, get the young guy in for FG's, and cut someone else? Not sure if it works, but seems like some other teams have done that.
I think the Falcons did that either last year or the year before that.
__________________
R.I.P. #21

New words created on The Warpath:
Rewalsr - Somretimes - Fualt - Jersesy - Itiot - Composetory
Afeard - Storgn - Empliment - Gaissn - Saftys - Minnisota
Faviort - Hatter - Phsyched - Foof - Heloing - Brutual
Stroried - Agianst

"Give an opinion and move on. Your life doesn't depend on winning the internet." -FRPLG
Ruhskins is offline  
Old 10-09-2012, 02:32 PM   #273
Registered User
 
BigHairedAristocrat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 3,917
Re: Should Billy Cundiff still be cut!

Quote:
Originally Posted by CRedskinsRule View Post
Maybe I am wrong, but the quote you put here in no way equals your earlier statement



The actual airtime quote as you have it, says that Gano's inaccuracy was a primary source of their frustration and other factors may have made the decision more palatable. Your interpreted quote makes it sound like the openly religious issue was essentially why Shanahan got rid of Gano.

I don't see how the airtime quote you used in anyway equates to the statement you attributed to it.
Did you listen to it? If not, i suggest you listen to it, listen to voice inflections and tell me what you think.

In this interview, he mentions accuracy as it relates to directional kickoffs. In earlier interviews in the past few weeks on Skins at 1, he's repeatedly insinuated this is stupid because skins arent doing directional kickoffs this year. They just want to kick it out of the end zone so it cant be returned. In other intervews, Russell has stated the Skins told Gano they didnt blame him for any of the blocked kicks last year. He was 15 of his last 16. He's conistent.

I listen to redskins radio every day and Russells been expressing confusion regarding the skins decision to go with Cundiff over Gano since the move happens. Chris says he talks to Gano every day and openly admits he is baised in his favor. For weeks, Russell has indicated the reason the Skins cut Gano were largely personal and that Shanahan doesnt like him at all. However, he never elaborated until Sunday, which is why i mentioned it here.
BigHairedAristocrat is offline  
Old 10-09-2012, 02:40 PM   #274
Gamebreaker
 
CRedskinsRule's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Pasadena, Md
Age: 47
Posts: 12,881
Re: Should Billy Cundiff still be cut!

Quote:
Originally Posted by BigHairedAristocrat View Post
Did you listen to it? If not, i suggest you listen to it, listen to voice inflections and tell me what you think.

In this interview, he mentions accuracy as it relates to directional kickoffs. In earlier interviews in the past few weeks on Skins at 1, he's repeatedly insinuated this is stupid because skins arent doing directional kickoffs this year. They just want to kick it out of the end zone so it cant be returned. In other intervews, Russell has stated the Skins told Gano they didnt blame him for any of the blocked kicks last year. He was 15 of his last 16. He's conistent.

I listen to redskins radio every day and Russells been expressing confusion regarding the skins decision to go with Cundiff over Gano since the move happens. Chris says he talks to Gano every day and openly admits he is baised in his favor. For weeks, Russell has indicated the reason the Skins cut Gano were largely personal and that Shanahan doesnt like him at all. However, he never elaborated until Sunday, which is why i mentioned it here.
Gotcha, not going to go back and listen to it, because even as you have laid it all out I don't see anything that makes me feel the need too. As later tweets said, and per SS directly asking, CR has said that was not his intent.
__________________
Dirtbag59, sending songs to oblivion 1 writer at a time.
CRedskinsRule is offline  
Closed Thread

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:42 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site is not officially affiliated with the Washington Redskins or the NFL.
Page generated in 0.15513 seconds with 9 queries

Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0 RC5

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25