Week 6 Washington Redskins vs Minnesota Vikings Pregame Thread

punch it in · 10-11-2012, 03:03 PM

Im not a doctor and am ecstatic that RG-3 is playing this week(for obviously completely greedy reasons having to do with the redskins and my fantasy team). I understand the doctors cleared him to play, but that does not mean that it is ultimately the best thing for the athlete. There are plenty of studies done that show returning to soon can create problems down the road even after all of the follow up tests are done, passed, etc. I mean some of you guys are making it seem like nothing happened. The concussion that he suffered still puts him in a more vulnerable spot than someone who did not suffer one last week. It is not complete idiocy to think that sitting RG-3 for another week is at least a viable option.

NC_Skins · 10-11-2012, 03:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by punch it in

I understand the doctors cleared him to play, but that does not mean that it is ultimately the best thing for the athlete.

Ultimately, the best thing for a athlete is to never play a contact sport like football. If you feel so strong about it, stop watching football.

Mattyk · 10-11-2012, 03:13 PM

At this point a concussion would be less painful than this thread.

los panda · 10-11-2012, 03:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mattyk

At this point a concussion would be less painful than this thread.

so, how 'bout that adrian peterson?

punch it in · 10-11-2012, 03:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by NC_Skins

Ultimately, the best thing for a athlete is to never play a contact sport like football. If you feel so strong about it, stop watching football.

Wow -that sounds like some good ole ES stuff rite there.
Classic - never watch football - close the thread??? lol
All im saying is I am sure there was some thought about playing/not playing him this week as well there should be.
To dismiss the fact that he suffered a concussion because he is not as fast as a race car is crazy and over the top.

I never said I feel so strongly about anything Im just making some points. Did I say I dont think he should play? No. I said it is not an idiotic thought like you guys are making it out to be.

SmootSmack · 10-11-2012, 03:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by punch it in

Im not a doctor and am ecstatic that RG-3 is playing this week(for obviously completely greedy reasons having to do with the redskins and my fantasy team). I understand the doctors cleared him to play, but that does not mean that it is ultimately the best thing for the athlete. There are plenty of studies done that show returning to soon can create problems down the road even after all of the follow up tests are done, passed, etc. I mean some of you guys are making it seem like nothing happened. The concussion that he suffered still puts him in a more vulnerable spot than someone who did not suffer one last week. It is not complete idiocy to think that sitting RG-3 for another week is at least a viable option.

I get that, but how long do you sit him out? What does sitting him out a week do? If you don't play him until the Giants game on the 21st and he gets a concussion then, would it be any better than playing him this weekend and he doesn't get one?

los panda · 10-11-2012, 03:29 PM

i understand the better safe than sorry approach. with a brain injury, i get that point of view - like if we can't confirm on thursday that he will be ready to go on sunday, better sit him, give him some more time, and error on the side of caution.

but, that being said, griff is a smart man, i trust his trust in the examining doctors.

punch it in · 10-11-2012, 03:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SmootSmack

I get that, but how long do you sit him out? What does sitting him out a week do? If you don't play him until the Giants game on the 21st and he gets a concussion then, would it be any better than playing him this weekend and he doesn't get one?

There is no rite answer to that. Its a judgement call. Again im not saying i would be for the cautious (which is not another word for stupid) and not play him but sure a week cant hurt. Yea i think the quicker the time frame between concussions absolutely definitely the worse.

edit: - he might not get one this week is obvious, but he is at more of a risk, where is in two weeks after more healing of the brain he would be closer to if not fully to where he was before this ever happened. It is not that complicated that I need to be a neurologist - brain, ankle, shoulder - whatever the body part, obviously the more time it has to heal the more back to normal and the more out of risk said body part will be vulnerable to another injury.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

CRedskinsRule · 10-11-2012, 03:33 PM

Earlier in the week Accuscore actually had this game as a tie with both teams scoring 23.6 points now it shows 24.1 to 23.5, not sure what changed it.

and stealing from ESPN's intel page:
Minnesota's last 5 games
Opp Score
TEN(1-4) ........W 30-7
@DET(1-3)......W 20-13
SFO(4-1)........ W 24-13
@IND(2-2)...... L 20-23
JAC(1-4)........W 26-23 (OT)

Ours
Opp Score
ATL(5-0).........L 17-24
@TAM(1-3).......W 24-22
CIN(3-2).........L 31-38
@STL(3-2).......L 28-31
@NOR(1-4).......W 40-32

Bucket · 10-11-2012, 03:44 PM

I got concussed reading this thread i started about the game. Doctors have cleared me to post after this one immediately. Although the Warpath has me out 3-4 weeks.

I think some of the people here handled Deon Sanders turf toe, and Landrys ankle.

punch it in · 10-11-2012, 03:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by los panda

bitte schön

Bottom line is - RG-3 wilst spiele fussball this weekend and I hope he doesnt bangen his noggin again.

skinsguy · 10-11-2012, 03:46 PM

I think I'm suffering from a concussion watching this thread. Just now, Matty asked me which page we were on and I couldn't tell him.

SmootSmack · 10-11-2012, 03:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by punch it in

There is no rite answer to that. Its a judgement call. Again im not saying i would be for the cautious (which is not another word for stupid) and not play him but sure a week cant hurt. Yea i think the quicker the time frame between concussions absolutely definitely the worse.

edit: - he might not get one this week is obvious, but he is at more of a risk, where is in two weeks after more healing of the brain he would be closer to if not fully to where he was before this ever happened. It is not that complicated that I need to be a neurologist - brain, ankle, shoulder - whatever the body part, obviously the more time it has to heal the more back to normal and the more out of risk said body part will be vulnerable to another injury.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Yeah but he's at more of a risk playing in two weeks, vs three; three weeks vs four, etc.

Anyway, he was fine in practice today so he'll probably play on Sunday. I'm actually more interested in seeing if they make Rex the #2 QB this weekend. Though I suspect they'll stick with Cousins

punch it in · 10-11-2012, 03:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bucket

I got concussed reading this thread i started about the game. Doctors have cleared me to post after this one immediately. Although the Warpath has me out 3-4 weeks.

I think some of the people here handled Deon Sanders turf toe, and Landrys ankle.

You actually started it about the game and hoping RG-3 would play this weekend with a link to the article about his concussion. Did you think that was not going to lead to talk about his concussion?

los panda · 10-11-2012, 04:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SmootSmack

Yeah but he's at more of a risk playing in two weeks, vs three; three weeks vs four, etc.

Anyway, he was fine in practice today so he'll probably play on Sunday. I'm actually more interested in seeing if they make Rex the #2 QB this weekend. Though I suspect they'll stick with Cousins

i say roll w cousins. the more time he spends on the field, the more he can improve. the more time rex spends on the field, well, we know how that goes.

10-11-2012, 03:03 PM	#91
punch it in Playmaker Join Date: Aug 2012 Location: toms river, nj Age: 41 Posts: 3,369	Re: Week 6 Washington Redskins vs Minnesota Vikings Pregame Thread Im not a doctor and am ecstatic that RG-3 is playing this week(for obviously completely greedy reasons having to do with the redskins and my fantasy team). I understand the doctors cleared him to play, but that does not mean that it is ultimately the best thing for the athlete. There are plenty of studies done that show returning to soon can create problems down the road even after all of the follow up tests are done, passed, etc. I mean some of you guys are making it seem like nothing happened. The concussion that he suffered still puts him in a more vulnerable spot than someone who did not suffer one last week. It is not complete idiocy to think that sitting RG-3 for another week is at least a viable option.

10-11-2012, 03:13 PM	#93
Mattyk ‎\m/ Join Date: Feb 2004 Age: 40 Posts: 73,193	Re: Week 6 Washington Redskins vs Minnesota Vikings Pregame Thread At this point a concussion would be less painful than this thread. __________________ Support The Warpath! \| Warpath Shop

10-11-2012, 03:29 PM	#97
los panda Playmaker Join Date: Mar 2009 Location: los angeles, ca Age: 28 Posts: 3,857	Re: Week 6 Washington Redskins vs Minnesota Vikings Pregame Thread i understand the better safe than sorry approach. with a brain injury, i get that point of view - like if we can't confirm on thursday that he will be ready to go on sunday, better sit him, give him some more time, and error on the side of caution. but, that being said, griff is a smart man, i trust his trust in the examining doctors. __________________ 7 9 21 28 33 42 43 44 49 65 70 81

10-11-2012, 03:33 PM	#99
CRedskinsRule MVP Join Date: Aug 2008 Location: Pasadena, Md Age: 45 Posts: 11,020	Re: Week 6 Washington Redskins vs Minnesota Vikings Pregame Thread Earlier in the week Accuscore actually had this game as a tie with both teams scoring 23.6 points now it shows 24.1 to 23.5, not sure what changed it. and stealing from ESPN's intel page: Minnesota's last 5 games Opp Score TEN(1-4) ........W 30-7 @DET(1-3)......W 20-13 SFO(4-1)........ W 24-13 @IND(2-2)...... L 20-23 JAC(1-4)........W 26-23 (OT) Ours Opp Score ATL(5-0).........L 17-24 @TAM(1-3).......W 24-22 CIN(3-2).........L 31-38 @STL(3-2).......L 28-31 @NOR(1-4).......W 40-32 Last edited by CRedskinsRule; 10-11-2012 at 03:40 PM.

10-11-2012, 03:44 PM	#100
Bucket The Starter Join Date: Sep 2009 Location: Martinsburg, WV Posts: 2,136	Re: Week 6 Washington Redskins vs Minnesota Vikings Pregame Thread I got concussed reading this thread i started about the game. Doctors have cleared me to post after this one immediately. Although the Warpath has me out 3-4 weeks. I think some of the people here handled Deon Sanders turf toe, and Landrys ankle. __________________ HTTR Redskin Fan since '88 Be friends on Twitter! @thecasualhero

10-11-2012, 03:46 PM	#102
skinsguy Pro Bowl Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: Greensboro, North Carolina Posts: 6,014	Re: Week 6 Washington Redskins vs Minnesota Vikings Pregame Thread I think I'm suffering from a concussion watching this thread. Just now, Matty asked me which page we were on and I couldn't tell him. __________________ Not the same Skinsguy that posts on ES.

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

Week 6 Washington Redskins vs Minnesota Vikings Pregame Thread

Redskins Locker Room