Warpath  

Home | Forums | Salary Cap Info | Shop | Donate | Stay Connected




Go Back   Warpath > Redskins Forums > Redskins Locker Room


Tanard Jackson

Redskins Locker Room


Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 11-30-2012, 05:05 PM   #16
New HC, new hope!
 
RedskinRat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: I'm in LA, trick!
Posts: 8,702
Re: Tanard Jackson

Quote:
Originally Posted by skinsfan69 View Post
What about Honey Badger as a mid rounder? I like him at free safety.
At 5'9" and 180lbs? No!
RedskinRat is offline   Reply With Quote

Advertisements
Old 11-30-2012, 05:25 PM   #17
You did WHAT?!?
 
EARTHQUAKE2689's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: In The Kitchen With Dyna.
Age: 25
Posts: 12,224
Re: Tanard Jackson

Quote:
Originally Posted by RedskinRat View Post
At 5'9" and 180lbs? No!
Did you watch him at LSU? He can add 15-20 lbs but he would.be better suited at strong safety
__________________
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bpp3ycMvQd0

This is why you need Mentos. To justify your questionable problem solving skills.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z7geP5ev0VI

Awesome isn't it.
EARTHQUAKE2689 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-30-2012, 05:38 PM   #18
Living Legend
 
Ruhskins's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 16,401
Re: Tanard Jackson

Quote:
Originally Posted by EARTHQUAKE2689 View Post
Did you watch him at LSU? He can add 15-20 lbs but he would.be better suited at strong safety
We have a bigger need at FS.
__________________
R.I.P. #21

New words created on The Warpath:
Rewalsr - Somretimes - Fualt - Jersesy - Itiot - Composetory
Afeard - Storgn - Empliment - Gaissn - Saftys - Minnisota
Faviort - Hatter - Phsyched - Foof - Heloing - Brutual
Stroried - Agianst

"Give an opinion and move on. Your life doesn't depend on winning the internet." -FRPLG
Ruhskins is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-30-2012, 05:39 PM   #19
Registered User
 
CultBrennan59's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 6,527
Re: Tanard Jackson



apparently you all dont understand that a player who is generously listed at 5-9 179lbs can't just gain 21+lbs of muscle after not playing football for a whole year, as a CB and just become an NFL SS (or FS..which is worse cause you must be able to cover very well if your a FS). IT DOESNT WORK LIKE THAT. You all think he can basically become a Bob Sanders who played SS at 5-8 205-210lbs...He played SS at Iowa, he played 3 straight years in college. Theres your differences.
CultBrennan59 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-30-2012, 06:37 PM   #20
Camp Scrub
 
tryst1540's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 4
Re: Tanard Jackson

I really do like Jackson, but he's not reliable. We need guys on this team that's committed to football. I don't want any more lazy guys, guys with drug problems, guys who are injury prone, guys who can't stay out of trouble off field, locker room cancers, etc. I want guys who are completely committed to winning and nothing less. If for some reason we do bring him back he must be kept on a very, very short leash. He needs to be test twice a week. If he comes up positive just one time we cut all tides with him. The way I look at this guy really did let down team with his off field behavior.
tryst1540 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-30-2012, 06:48 PM   #21
Gamebreaker
 
Chico23231's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Richmond, VA
Age: 37
Posts: 12,573
Re: Tanard Jackson

Quote:
Originally Posted by tryst1540 View Post
I really do like Jackson, but he's not reliable. We need guys on this team that's committed to football. I don't want any more lazy guys, guys with drug problems, guys who are injury prone, guys who can't stay out of trouble off field, locker room cancers, etc. I want guys who are completely committed to winning and nothing less. If for some reason we do bring him back he must be kept on a very, very short leash. He needs to be test twice a week. If he comes up positive just one time we cut all tides with him. The way I look at this guy really did let down team with his off field behavior.
word up
__________________
Boycott Rolling Stone Magazine
Chico23231 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-30-2012, 10:32 PM   #22
Playmaker
 
mlmpetert's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Richmond
Posts: 3,257
Re: Tanard Jackson

I really like taking chances on players and giving good players second chances. That said i dont think honeybadger is worth the risk before the 6th round and keeping jackson is a bad idea, without the intentions of replacing him with someone thats actually serviceable and reliably at the saftey position.

I liked honeybadger a lot and think hes finally on the right path for sorting out his life but the dude just seems like hes gonna be way too raw to use a pick on before the 6th, maybe even the 7th.

I liked tanard jackson a lot and even though neither worked out i liked the fact that we took a chance on him and merriweather. I like that were taking chances. Think about how much better our d would be if jackson and merriweather were back there right now. But i saw this a while back and i dont think jackson is going to never be not be an idiot:

http://www.sportscardforum.com/threa...ucs-)-buy-weed
__________________
mlmpetert is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-30-2012, 11:19 PM   #23
Registered User
 
RGIII's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 626
Re: Tanard Jackson

Quote:
Originally Posted by skinsfan69 View Post
What about Honey Badger as a mid rounder? I like him at free safety.
Mathieu, Tanard, Trent, and Fred; what's the difference between either of them? None of them can be trusted really.
RGIII is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-30-2012, 11:24 PM   #24
Playmaker
 
Defensewins's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 2,939
Re: Tanard Jackson

Tanard is playing for the vet minimum or close to it. Give him one more chance, we have nothing to lose. I think the redskins have every intention of giving him another chance. I believe next year is our last year of Salary cap penalty hell. Tanard would be a cheap solution to FS position and we can spend on other needs.
Defensewins is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-30-2012, 11:42 PM   #25
The Starter
 
44Deezel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Davidsonville
Posts: 1,703
Re: Tanard Jackson

If Jackson and Meriweather play this year and if Orakpo and Kerriker don't go down for the season, how good is the Defense? Is Haslett still considered the worst D Coordinator ever?
__________________
I am a system poster.
44Deezel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-01-2012, 12:00 AM   #26
Quietly Dominating the East
 
Hog1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Naples, Florida
Posts: 9,462
Re: Tanard Jackson

Quote:
Originally Posted by RGIII View Post
Mathieu, Tanard, Trent, and Fred; what's the difference between either of them? None of them can be trusted really.
Time will tell......
Everybody deserves a second chance. Multiple chances.....maybe not
__________________
Goodbye Sean..........Vaya Con Dios
thankyou Joe.......
“God made certain people to play football. He was one of them.” – Joe Gibbs
Hog1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-01-2012, 01:14 AM   #27
Pro Bowl
 
53Fan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Kill Devil Hills, N.C.
Posts: 7,400
Re: Tanard Jackson

I remember Shanahan talking about Jackson and how much he liked him. This was after the suspension was handed down and Mike said he was disappointed because he really liked the guy and I remember thinking he would probably give this guy another chance if he could. I think he looks to find someone else but it would'nt surprise me to see Mike keep him in the mix.
__________________
"Cautiously And Optimistically... Looking Forward To Change"
53Fan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-01-2012, 01:49 AM   #28
You did WHAT?!?
 
EARTHQUAKE2689's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: In The Kitchen With Dyna.
Age: 25
Posts: 12,224
Re: Tanard Jackson

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ruhskins View Post
We have a bigger need at FS.
I think we have a big need at either safety. Mathieu would help extremely. David Amerson to play CB or FS Eric Reid in the 2nd round, Mathieu for SS/CB in the 3
__________________
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bpp3ycMvQd0

This is why you need Mentos. To justify your questionable problem solving skills.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z7geP5ev0VI

Awesome isn't it.
EARTHQUAKE2689 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-01-2012, 02:57 AM   #29
Registered User
 
CultBrennan59's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 6,527
Re: Tanard Jackson

Quote:
Originally Posted by EARTHQUAKE2689 View Post
I think we have a big need at either safety. Mathieu would help extremely. David Amerson to play CB or FS Eric Reid in the 2nd round, Mathieu for SS/CB in the 3
I don't see
A) how we get all 3 of those players

B) why you think Reid is going in the second

C) why you would take mathieu in the 3rd.

D) Why you want amerson..that dudes been abused by opposing QBs this year.
CultBrennan59 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-01-2012, 10:46 AM   #30
Impact Rookie
 
Evilgrin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 746
Re: Tanard Jackson

Quote:
Originally Posted by 44Deezel View Post
If Jackson and Meriweather play this year and if Orakpo and Kerriker don't go down for the season, how good is the Defense? Is Haslett still considered the worst D Coordinator ever?
Not above 20th, still need more parts, esp with Fletch aging.
Evilgrin is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:37 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site is not officially affiliated with the Washington Redskins or the NFL.
Page generated in 0.33930 seconds with 9 queries

Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0 RC5

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25