Warpath  

Home | Forums | Salary Cap Info | Shop | Donate | Stay Connected




Go Back   Warpath > Redskins Forums > Redskins Locker Room


Chris Cooley

Redskins Locker Room


Closed Thread
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 12-11-2012, 06:28 PM   #76
Franchise Player
 
FRPLG's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Age: 35
Posts: 9,917
Re: Chris Cooley

Quote:
Originally Posted by The Goat View Post
You'll see Cooley open and the ball forced elsewhere. Happened (again) in the Ravens game.
Right. When the other TEs are in the game Bob is cool with getting them the ball but when CC is in the game he is trying so hard not to that he'll force it elsewhere. So not only is Shanny holding CC back he has a conspiracy with RGIII to do so.
FRPLG is offline  

Advertisements
Old 12-11-2012, 06:29 PM   #77
Registered User
 
The Goat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 5,662
Re: Chris Cooley

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mattyk View Post
Mike is clearly holding Cooley back.

I mean, what's obvious is Mike/Kyle have left him out of the passing game. Instead, they work in Paul who drops passes, bobbles after the catch and doesn't get any YAC, etc.

Is there a meaningful difference between the statements?
The Goat is offline  
Old 12-11-2012, 06:31 PM   #78
Registered User
 
The Goat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 5,662
Re: Chris Cooley

Quote:
Originally Posted by FRPLG View Post
Right. When the other TEs are in the game Bob is cool with getting them the ball but when CC is in the game he is trying so hard not to that he'll force it elsewhere. So not only is Shanny holding CC back he has a conspiracy with RGIII to do so.
Truly one of the dumbest posts I've ever read here. Do you not watch us play? Cooley is rarely targeted, but myself and others have seen him open. It's pretty simple. All the nonsense you added is just...nonsense.
The Goat is offline  
Old 12-11-2012, 06:33 PM   #79
The Starter
 
REDSKINS4ever's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Born and raised in D.C.....but I'm a New Yorker now....
Posts: 2,111
Re: Chris Cooley

Quote:
Originally Posted by los panda View Post
and that means cooley should be
In place of Davis, yes he should be. Cooley lost his way when he ended up on IR two straight seasons. But it seems when he gets healthy and he's ready to play, he's all of a sudden not in this regime's plans even if he is still capable of contributing a great deal.
REDSKINS4ever is offline  
Old 12-11-2012, 06:34 PM   #80
Playmaker
 
los panda's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: los angeles, ca
Age: 29
Posts: 4,051
Re: Chris Cooley

it's getting heated in here.

coo-ley! coo-ley! coo-ley!
__________________
7 9 21 28 33 42 43 44 49 65 70 81
los panda is offline  
Old 12-11-2012, 06:34 PM   #81
‎\m/
 
Mattyk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 41
Posts: 80,655
Re: Chris Cooley

Quote:
Originally Posted by The Goat View Post
I mean, what's obvious is Mike/Kyle have left him out of the passing game. Instead, they work in Paul who drops passes, bobbles after the catch and doesn't get any YAC, etc.

Is there a meaningful difference between the statements?
Paul gets what, maybe 1-2 looks a game? Who cares.

They obviously feel more comfortable with Cooley blocking. Or maybe they've had some plays with him involved in the passing game and things just haven't gone his way for whatever reason.

Why does there always have to be some sort of conspiracy with you?
__________________
Support The Warpath! | Warpath Shop
Mattyk is offline  
Old 12-11-2012, 06:34 PM   #82
Quietly Dominating the East
 
Hog1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Naples, Florida
Posts: 8,991
Re: Chris Cooley

Quote:
Originally Posted by FRPLG View Post
Right. When the other TEs are in the game Bob is cool with getting them the ball but when CC is in the game he is trying so hard not to that he'll force it elsewhere. So not only is Shanny holding CC back he has a conspiracy with RGIII to do so.
..........I KNOW, right?
__________________
Goodbye Sean..........Vaya Con Dios
thankyou Joe.......
Win! Always win!
By fair means or foul, by soft words and hard deeds...
by treachery, by cunning, by malpractice...
but always win--Edward Teach
Hog1 is offline  
Old 12-11-2012, 06:35 PM   #83
Living Legend
 
Ruhskins's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 15,757
Re: Chris Cooley

Quote:
Originally Posted by The Goat View Post
I mean, what's obvious is Mike/Kyle have left him out of the passing game. Instead, they work in Paul who drops passes, bobbles after the catch and doesn't get any YAC, etc.

Is there a meaningful difference between the statements?
Paul has only been targeted four times in the past 5 games, how is that taking passes away from anyone? Please explained in a coherent way with facts. Thanks.

(Keep in mind that I don't like Paul)
__________________
R.I.P. #21

New words created on The Warpath:
Rewalsr - Somretimes - Fualt - Jersesy - Itiot - Composetory
Afeard - Storgn - Empliment - Gaissn - Saftys - Minnisota
Faviort - Hatter - Phsyched - Foof - Heloing - Brutual
Stroried

"Give an opinion and move on. Your life doesn't depend on winning the internet." -FRPLG
Ruhskins is offline  
Old 12-11-2012, 06:36 PM   #84
Playmaker
 
los panda's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: los angeles, ca
Age: 29
Posts: 4,051
Re: Chris Cooley

Quote:
Originally Posted by REDSKINS4ever View Post
In place of Davis, yes he should be. Cooley lost his way when he ended up on IR two straight seasons. But it seems when he gets healthy and he's ready to play, he's all of a sudden not in this regime's plans even if he is still capable of contributing a great deal.
what about shockey, he's healthy

winslow is healthy

todd heap?

gonzalez is the rare exception.

gates is 32 and has already fallen off
__________________
7 9 21 28 33 42 43 44 49 65 70 81
los panda is offline  
Old 12-11-2012, 06:40 PM   #85
The Starter
 
REDSKINS4ever's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Born and raised in D.C.....but I'm a New Yorker now....
Posts: 2,111
Re: Chris Cooley

How about they make Cooley a fullback and put Darrell Young back at LB?
REDSKINS4ever is offline  
Old 12-11-2012, 06:41 PM   #86
Living Legend
 
Ruhskins's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 15,757
Re: Chris Cooley

This is how irrelevant this TE discussion is...

Targets in the past 5 games by receivers:

Garcon 36
Morgan 30
Paulsen 16
Hank 14
Moss 12
Paul 4
Robinson 4

RG3's top targets are Garcon and Morgan. After that, RG3 is going to distribute the ball, so it really doesn't matter who's playing at TE other than Davis. And even then, I don't think RG3 was looking his way a lot.
__________________
R.I.P. #21

New words created on The Warpath:
Rewalsr - Somretimes - Fualt - Jersesy - Itiot - Composetory
Afeard - Storgn - Empliment - Gaissn - Saftys - Minnisota
Faviort - Hatter - Phsyched - Foof - Heloing - Brutual
Stroried

"Give an opinion and move on. Your life doesn't depend on winning the internet." -FRPLG

Last edited by Ruhskins; 12-11-2012 at 06:47 PM.
Ruhskins is offline  
Old 12-11-2012, 06:41 PM   #87
MVP
 
CRedskinsRule's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Pasadena, Md
Age: 47
Posts: 12,388
Re: Chris Cooley

Quote:
Originally Posted by The Goat View Post
You'll see Cooley open and the ball forced elsewhere. Happened (again) in the Ravens game.
And again, you don't think that Bob has his receivers he's comfortable with? My guess is that Bob has an attitude similar to Shanahan's. I am going to go to the guys I trust and who I know will be where they were in practice. Seems like he has thrown to a number of TE's, but also that he has "his" guys, Garcon, and Davis clearly were his first guys. By the time he gets down to Cooley, I think he is debating whether he is better off running or tossing.

(all speculation on my part)
__________________
Dirtbag59, sending songs to oblivion 1 writer at a time.
CRedskinsRule is online now  
Old 12-11-2012, 06:41 PM   #88
‎\m/
 
Mattyk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 41
Posts: 80,655
Re: Chris Cooley

Quote:
Originally Posted by The Goat View Post
Truly one of the dumbest posts I've ever read here. Do you not watch us play? Cooley is rarely targeted, but myself and others have seen him open. It's pretty simple. All the nonsense you added is just...nonsense.
You obviously don't read your own stuff.

Boom.
__________________
Support The Warpath! | Warpath Shop
Mattyk is offline  
Old 12-11-2012, 06:42 PM   #89
Registered User
 
The Goat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 5,662
Re: Chris Cooley

[QUOTE=Mattyk;974515]Paul gets what, maybe 1-2 looks a game? Who cares.

They obviously feel more comfortable with Cooley blocking. Or maybe they've had some plays with him involved in the passing game and things just haven't gone his way for whatever reason.

Why does there always have to be some sort of conspiracy with you?[/QUOTE]

You didn't have (sarcasm) in there, so I assume you're serious? WTF...I'm not talking conspiracy. What are you talking about? It's not a conspiracy when the coaches decide to leave a player out of the passing game. It could be a mistake, especially when you keep going back to a different player who doesn't execute. I thought that's what we're discussing here, no?
The Goat is offline  
Old 12-11-2012, 06:43 PM   #90
Franchise Player
 
FRPLG's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Age: 35
Posts: 9,917
Re: Chris Cooley

Quote:
Originally Posted by The Goat View Post
Truly one of the dumbest posts I've ever read here. Do you not watch us play? Cooley is rarely targeted, but myself and others have seen him open. It's pretty simple. All the nonsense you added is just...nonsense.
Oh this is rich
FRPLG is offline  
Closed Thread

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:47 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site is not officially affiliated with the Washington Redskins or the NFL.
Page generated in 0.27211 seconds with 9 queries

Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0 RC5

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25