![]() |
| |||||||
![]() |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
| | #31 |
| Playmaker Join Date: Sep 2010 Location: Holland, Michigan
Posts: 3,911
| Re: Russel Wilson or Bob We're on the verge of winning the division for the first time since dirt was born and someone wants to second guess our QB pick in the last draft?
__________________ REDSKINS FAN SINCE 1968 CHARTER MEMEBER OF THE DALLAS SWEEPERS CLUB |
| | |
| Advertisements |
| | #32 |
| Franchise Player Join Date: May 2004 Age: 34
Posts: 9,293
| Re: Russel Wilson or Bob One of the biggest issues we have on defense since he's been out is that we can't generate pressure out of four man rushes...how does getting rid of our best pass rusher help that? Jackson IS NOT better at that. I'd be shocked to learn anyone felt he was. |
| | |
| | #33 |
| Franchise Player Join Date: Mar 2009 Location: Richmond, VA Age: 36
Posts: 7,911
| Re: Russel Wilson or Bob lol, Like TO Killa said, Id gladly give up another first round pick for RG3
__________________ RG3 = Best QB in the East |
| | |
| | #34 |
| Impact Rookie Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 589
| Re: Russel Wilson or Bob There's no comparison. It should be Wilson or Cousins! If the Skins do play SEA in the playoffs, I'm inclined to think RGIII would make SEA's Richard Sherman eat his words that Wilson is better than RGIII!
__________________ "we call that runnin through the okra patch!" |
| | |
| | #35 |
| The Bluths ![]() Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 43,222
| Re: Russel Wilson or Bob Bob
__________________ You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You |
| | |
| | #36 |
| Pro Bowl Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 5,726
| Re: Russel Wilson or Bob I know that Orakpo can get to the QB more than Rob Jackson. Rob Jackson is better in pass coverage than Orakpo, thats it.
__________________ "Anyones better than Madieu Williams" |
| | |
| | #37 | |
| Franchise Player Join Date: Oct 2006 Location: Arlington, VA.
Posts: 8,126
| Re: Russel Wilson or Bob Quote:
| |
| | |
| | #38 |
| The Starter Join Date: Oct 2011 Location: Born and raised in D.C. and now lives in Harlem, New York
Posts: 2,036
| Re: Russel Wilson or Bob Stop calling RG3 Bob! That is so played out now. |
| | |
| | #39 | |
| The Starter Join Date: Sep 2005 Location: So. MD Age: 34
Posts: 1,271
| Re: Russel Wilson or Bob Quote:
Also, Bob. If Griffin had the luxury of Seattle's defense and special teams, we'd be talking Superbowl. | |
| | |
| | #40 |
| Franchise Player ![]() Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 8,079
| Re: Russel Wilson or Bob Really because RGII seems to be pretty well played...When I say RG3 I expect to see R2D2's cousin.
__________________ When life gives you paper jams, turn them into paper footballs! |
| | |
| | #41 |
| MVP ![]() Join Date: Aug 2008 Location: Pasadena, Md Age: 45
Posts: 11,024
| Re: Russel Wilson or Bob I understand the question, the comparative cost in hindsight is significant. HOWEVER, at the point of the draft, you would have been gambling this franchise's future for a 5'10 running qb. Shanahan may have been run out of town before the season started, and Wilson never would have gotten the chance to start. Add in the fact that he mainly won in a domed stadium with maybe the best homefield advantage in sports, and lost on the road, we would right now be in the midst of a coaching hunt. And that's before ST/Defense comes in as a factor. Finally, Griffin has held up and flourished under the media scrutiny that this town brings, I don't know how Wilson has done in Seattle, or how he would have done here, but again, I don't think it's a guarantee he succeeds at it like Griffin has. (to Redskins4Ever: Bob will never be worn out. I dream of the Superbowl trophy being raised, and Danny saying "This one's for Bob", only he doesn't have to wait as long as John did ) |
| | |
| | #42 | |
| \m/ ![]() Join Date: Feb 2004 Age: 40
Posts: 73,203
| Re: Russel Wilson or Bob Quote:
See yesterday. | |
| | |
| | #43 |
| MVP ![]() Join Date: Aug 2008 Location: Pasadena, Md Age: 45
Posts: 11,024
| Re: Russel Wilson or Bob |
| | |
| | #44 |
| Pro Bowl ![]() Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 5,044
| Re: Russel Wilson or Bob It's a pretty interesting question. I think if you limit the decision factors to draft picks (traded) and stats it's not crazy to wonder if Wilson would have been the better "deal." When you consider the intangibles it could be a totally different story though. I don't know much about Wilson, but I do know any QB in DC is under intense pressure/limelight and RG has shown extraordinary maturity and character. Wilson may be a real solid dude, but how do you know whether he could handle DC? DC after being sent out to catch a pass against Ryan Clark? DC with a 3-6 record and concern mounting about regime etc? Wilson, by comparison, has had it pretty easy. Better defense. Better coaching IMO (yeah, I realize everyone disagrees and feel free to post a million face palms, I don't care). Just no telling how he would have held up here. RG's intangibles are as impressive as his stats, and I think Mike and the braintrust recognized that early on.
__________________ Sometimes you eat the bear, and sometimes he eats you. |
| | |
| | #45 |
| Playmaker Join Date: Mar 2009 Location: los angeles, ca Age: 28
Posts: 3,857
| Re: Russel Wilson or Bob griff = 1st in the division wilson = ? the only player clearly on his last leg is fletcher, everyone else can make it past the cap penalties and the lack of 1st round picks. soon enough, people will stop questioning the griff trade
__________________ 7 9 21 28 33 42 43 44 49 65 70 81 |
| | |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |