Warpath  

Home | Forums | Salary Cap Info | Shop | Donate | Stay Connected




Go Back   Warpath > Redskins Forums > Redskins Locker Room


Patrick Ramsey better be Ready!!!!!

Redskins Locker Room


Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 03-10-2005, 04:56 PM   #1
Impact Rookie
 
ST21's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Texas
Posts: 519
Talking Patrick Ramsey better be Ready!!!!!

Ramsey Better be ready this year, He will be well protected, have a good WR core, and a Top 5 RB in this league, I expecting hella things out of Ramsey, at least 24td &9ints, 3200 yrds, and a QB rating of 85%, is that asking to much guys, please chime in...
ST21 is offline   Reply With Quote

Advertisements
Old 03-10-2005, 04:58 PM   #2
Playmaker
 
celts32's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Hackettstown NJ
Age: 43
Posts: 2,656
Re: Patrick Ramsey better be Ready!!!!!

Good WR core?$&*#*?$#?
celts32 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-10-2005, 04:59 PM   #3
MVP
 
mooby's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: NoVa
Age: 26
Posts: 11,819
Re: Patrick Ramsey better be Ready!!!!!

well i say 9 ints isn't something that can happen. 24 tds is a little much to be asking of someone who threw ten last year. i would say a qb rating of 80% is better. 3200 yards is a little too much also. i would say somewhere between 2200 yards and 2800 yards.
mooby is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-10-2005, 05:07 PM   #4
Karma Chameleon (I come and go)
 
jdlea's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Annapolis, MD
Age: 29
Posts: 3,087
Re: Patrick Ramsey better be Ready!!!!!

How do you know he will be protected? He didn't have great protection at the end of the year last year. Granted he should be, but nothing is guaranteed.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by SmootSmack
Albert Connell is perhaps the worst Redskin I ever had the misfortune of meeting. He's the kind of guy that makes media people covering their favorite team growing up no longer like that team
jdlea is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-10-2005, 05:15 PM   #5
Registered User
 
firstdown's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: chesapeake, va
Age: 50
Posts: 15,818
Re: Patrick Ramsey better be Ready!!!!!

Man ya'll ant very optimistic!
firstdown is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-10-2005, 05:19 PM   #6
MVP
 
mooby's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: NoVa
Age: 26
Posts: 11,819
Re: Patrick Ramsey better be Ready!!!!!

no, but i think we will have better pass protection because the line will look like this. samuels, dockery, rabach, thomas, jansen. it will be an upgrade from last year. last year it looked like this. samuels, dockery, raymer, thomas, and ray brown filling in for jansen. we had a lot of injuries on the o line last year.
mooby is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-10-2005, 05:34 PM   #7
The Starter
 
steveo395's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 1,674
Re: Patrick Ramsey better be Ready!!!!!

Quote:
Originally Posted by mooby
well i say 9 ints isn't something that can happen. 24 tds is a little much to be asking of someone who threw ten last year. i would say a qb rating of 80% is better. 3200 yards is a little too much also. i would say somewhere between 2200 yards and 2800 yards.
qb ratings dont go by percentages and 2200 yards blows...thats only 137.5yds/game
steveo395 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-10-2005, 05:48 PM   #8
Special Teams
 
BIGREDSKINFAN63's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: bassett-va
Age: 51
Posts: 289
Thumbs up Re: Patrick Ramsey better be Ready!!!!!

i think the whole damn team ought to be ready.these guys make outrageous money,

and most of the offense played like crap last year.wake up and eliver this year guys!

:smashfrea
__________________
"7 days without the redskins, makes one weak!!!"
BIGREDSKINFAN63 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-10-2005, 06:11 PM   #9
Playmaker
 
skinsfanthru&thru's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Richmond, VA
Age: 33
Posts: 3,710
Re: Patrick Ramsey better be Ready!!!!!

I think if Gibbs really changes the offense like he says we would, I could see Ramsey getting about 3,000 yards give or take a couple hundred, about 20 tds, 11 INTs and a comp % around 59. with jansen protecting his back, the addition of rabauch, as well as 2 years in gibbs' and bugels system will afford Ramsey much better protection and awareness than he has had in the past.
but then again I'm just hoping for ONE single year with only 1 qb needing to be used.
skinsfanthru&thru is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-10-2005, 06:19 PM   #10
Special Teams
 
aehs77's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: silver spring
Age: 29
Posts: 486
Re: Patrick Ramsey better be Ready!!!!!

i hate too say it but i see ramsey getting hurt early and hassellbeck having a hell of a year.
aehs77 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-10-2005, 06:30 PM   #11
The Starter
 
monk81's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: TEXAS
Posts: 2,029
Re: Patrick Ramsey better be Ready!!!!!

Quote:
Originally Posted by mooby
no, but i think we will have better pass protection because the line will look like this. samuels, dockery, rabach, thomas, jansen. it will be an upgrade from last year. last year it looked like this. samuels, dockery, raymer, thomas, and ray brown filling in for jansen. we had a lot of injuries on the o line last year.
I was thinking the same thing Mooby.........a healthy Jansen will upgrade the line, as well as our new center. Our receivers our decent enough, remember we have Portis.....we don't have to have our offense looke like the Indianapolis Colts with bombs away.....just a nice balanced offense, with some throws DOWN THE FIELD..........that would be sweet!
__________________
"It's absolutely criminal, in my opinion, that Monk has yet to be enshrined (in the Pro-Football Hall of Fame)" Dan Arkush PFW
monk81 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-10-2005, 06:39 PM   #12
Karma Chameleon (I come and go)
 
jdlea's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Annapolis, MD
Age: 29
Posts: 3,087
Re: Patrick Ramsey better be Ready!!!!!

I hope the line is better, I just don't know.

On another note, Hasselbeck sucks and will never have a hell of a year.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by SmootSmack
Albert Connell is perhaps the worst Redskin I ever had the misfortune of meeting. He's the kind of guy that makes media people covering their favorite team growing up no longer like that team
jdlea is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-10-2005, 06:41 PM   #13
The Starter
 
steveo395's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 1,674
Re: Patrick Ramsey better be Ready!!!!!

hasselbeck doesnt suck he's just too inconsistent
steveo395 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-10-2005, 07:34 PM   #14
Mr. Brightside
 
Big C's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Fairfax, Virginia
Age: 28
Posts: 4,439
Re: Patrick Ramsey better be Ready!!!!!

passing for 2200 yards is very, very, very few for a starter...id say around 3k if he plays all the games
__________________
"I don't care what nobody say I'm a be me, stay hood stay real, cause I'm out here grindin'" -Joe Gibbs
Big C is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-10-2005, 08:17 PM   #15
RG Glee
 
Schneed10's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Newtown Square, PA
Age: 34
Posts: 8,279
Re: Patrick Ramsey better be Ready!!!!!

2800 yards, 19 TDs, 17 INTs, 59% completion, 80 QB Rating.

I think he's a sturdy kid and can make it all 16 games, but the fact of the matter is hardly any QBs in the league play in every single game. I'll figure he plays 14 games and puts up 2800 yards, which works out to 200 per game. Gibbs' offense is still conservative, but 200 a game will be a slight step up from Ramsey's pace last year, which is reflective of the speedy receivers and going deep a bit more often.

On the TDs, I see him stepping it up a bit to 19 TDs in 14 games. I think he found a rapport with Cooley in the red zone at the end of last year which will continue, and I think Santana Moss will add some homerun capability that Coles didn't provide with his bum toe.

On the completion percentage, last year he was at 62%. I think if they're going to go deep a bit more, the completion % drops a bit to 59%.

Interceptions, last year he had 11 INTs. But remember, 3 of those were in that game where he came in and tried to dig the Redskins out of a hole when Brunell got hurt. I think it was against the Giants? In his 7 starts he had 8 INTs. So this season I say that trend continues, 17 INTs in 14 games.

Last season his QB rating was 74, with that horrible Giants game dragging it down. In his starts, it was better, I think around 80 or so. I'll go with that 80 figure, but if he can hit on some homerun passes to Moss & Patten, and still manage to keep the INTs down, I could see him getting up to a 90 rating.

I don't see him making the pro bowl, but if he can play like I describe above, and Portis has a good year, I think that's good enough to go to the playoffs.
Schneed10 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:08 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site is not officially affiliated with the Washington Redskins or the NFL.
Page generated in 0.26465 seconds with 9 queries

Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0 RC5

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25