Warpath  

Home | Forums | Salary Cap Info | Shop | Donate | Stay Connected




Go Back   Warpath > Redskins Forums > Redskins Locker Room


RGIII has been cleared for practice

Redskins Locker Room


Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 07-24-2013, 05:34 PM   #46
Playmaker
 
Defensewins's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 2,829
Re: RGIII has been cleared for practice

RGIII confirmed in the press conference today that he "will not play this preseason unless it is absolutely necessary."
I agree with this move.
Defensewins is offline   Reply With Quote

Advertisements
Old 07-24-2013, 06:52 PM   #47
Franchise Player
 
skinsfan69's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Arlington, VA.
Posts: 9,202
Re: RGIII has been cleared for practice

Quote:
Originally Posted by Defensewins View Post
RGIII confirmed in the press conference today that he "will not play this preseason unless it is absolutely necessary."
I agree with this move.
Everybody needs some work in the pre season. I think he should play a little bit.
skinsfan69 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-24-2013, 07:01 PM   #48
MVP
 
CRedskinsRule's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Pasadena, Md
Age: 46
Posts: 12,150
Re: RGIII has been cleared for practice

I don't know if this is somewhere else, or even if it could go somewhere else on the forum.

I found it interesting.

Quarterback injuries: Are mobile QBs like Colin Kaepernick more injury-prone than pocket passers? - Slate Magazine
CRedskinsRule is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-24-2013, 07:34 PM   #49
Playmaker
 
NYCskinfan82's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Queens, NYC
Age: 44
Posts: 3,306
Re: RGIII has been cleared for practice

Maybe I misunderstood RG3 said he doesn't think he will play pre season Jamie Dukes turned it into he doesn't like Training Camp.
NYCskinfan82 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-24-2013, 07:59 PM   #50
Living Legend
 
skinsfaninok's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Oklahoma City (Originally from Biloxi, Ms)
Age: 27
Posts: 16,014
Yeah what's up with all this RG3 said he doesn't want to do TC? I didn't catch him saying that
__________________
THUNDER UP

"if you're good at something, never do it for free"- The Joker

skinsfaninok is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 07-24-2013, 08:06 PM   #51
Registered User
 
Green Monk Machine's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Parkville
Posts: 464
Re: RGIII has been cleared for practice

Quote:
Originally Posted by Defensewins View Post
RGIII confirmed in the press conference today that he "will not play this preseason unless it is absolutely necessary."
I agree with this move.
Yeah me too. I'm on the side with letting KC lead the team thru preseason and start week 1.
Green Monk Machine is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-24-2013, 08:33 PM   #52
Playmaker
 
redskins5044's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Schertz, Tx
Age: 34
Posts: 3,082
Quote:
Originally Posted by Green Monk Machine View Post
Yeah me too. I'm on the side with letting KC lead the team thru preseason and start week 1.
What's the point of just letting KC play week 1 just for RG3 to play week 2. He is going to eventually need to get some live action, if they are really worried about his injury then PUP him and get him back after week 6.
__________________
Spider 2 Y Banana Jr. is the new Head Coach.
redskins5044 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-24-2013, 09:08 PM   #53
Registered User
 
Green Monk Machine's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Parkville
Posts: 464
Re: RGIII has been cleared for practice

Quote:
Originally Posted by redskins5044 View Post
What's the point of just letting KC play week 1 just for RG3 to play week 2. He is going to eventually need to get some live action, if they are really worried about his injury then PUP him and get him back after week 6.
I can answer that- its been reported Rob is t goin to play this Peseason, KC is getting the reps with the 1st team instead and week 1 is only just the eagles. We don't need the "big guns" (RG3) for this. Why did we draft KC ? Start him week 1!
Green Monk Machine is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-24-2013, 09:14 PM   #54
‎\m/
 
Mattyk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 41
Posts: 79,438
Re: RGIII has been cleared for practice

Quote:
Originally Posted by NYCskinfan82 View Post
Maybe I misunderstood RG3 said he doesn't think he will play pre season Jamie Dukes turned it into he doesn't like Training Camp.
Ugh here comes the drama, mountains outta molehills...

F Dukes and Irvin for even questioning RG3's commitment given what he went through with the injury and quick recovery. Just pure insanity.
__________________
Support The Warpath! | Warpath Shop
Mattyk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-24-2013, 09:26 PM   #55
Living Legend
 
skinsfaninok's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Oklahoma City (Originally from Biloxi, Ms)
Age: 27
Posts: 16,014
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mattyk View Post
Ugh here comes the drama, mountains outta molehills...

F Dukes and Irvin for even questioning RG3's commitment given what he went through with the injury and quick recovery. Just pure insanity.
What did Griffin say?
__________________
THUNDER UP

"if you're good at something, never do it for free"- The Joker

skinsfaninok is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 07-24-2013, 09:51 PM   #56
‎\m/
 
Mattyk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 41
Posts: 79,438
Re: RGIII has been cleared for practice

Jamie Dukes basically questioned RG3's commitment. He seems to be using the spin that this is RG3's decision to not play when it seems to be obvious it's a decision that everyone is on board with.
__________________
Support The Warpath! | Warpath Shop
Mattyk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-24-2013, 09:56 PM   #57
Living Legend
 
skinsfaninok's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Oklahoma City (Originally from Biloxi, Ms)
Age: 27
Posts: 16,014
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mattyk View Post
Jamie Dukes basically questioned RG3's commitment. He seems to be using the spin that this is RG3's decision to not play when it seems to be obvious it's a decision that everyone is on board with.
What an idiot
__________________
THUNDER UP

"if you're good at something, never do it for free"- The Joker

skinsfaninok is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 07-24-2013, 10:03 PM   #58
‎\m/
 
Mattyk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 41
Posts: 79,438
Re: RGIII has been cleared for practice

RG3 hates the preseason and is sending the wrong message to his team according to Dukes.

Did we not spend the entire offseason listening to these talking heads blast the team for playing RG3 when he was hurt, not caring about the player, etc.? Now the team is taking it's time with their star player and trying to take the safer route and it's F them for trying to be smart.
__________________
Support The Warpath! | Warpath Shop
Mattyk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-24-2013, 10:05 PM   #59
Playmaker
 
Paintrain's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Ft. Lauderdale, FL
Age: 43
Posts: 4,878
Re: RGIII has been cleared for practice

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mattyk View Post
Jamie Dukes basically questioned RG3's commitment. He seems to be using the spin that this is RG3's decision to not play when it seems to be obvious it's a decision that everyone is on board with.
Dukes is the Skip Bayless of NFL Network.
__________________
FREE RG3!
Paintrain is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-24-2013, 10:20 PM   #60
MVP
 
mooby's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: NoVa
Age: 25
Posts: 11,754
Re: RGIII has been cleared for practice

I wouldn't mind if RG3 played a quarter this preseason just to get his feet wet, but the game speed is totally different so if he doesn't play at all I won't mind.

As far as Dukes/Irvin go, I think they're achieving exactly what they want out of their statements, which is more people discussing their thoughts. Just like any other decision made by any other coach, some people are going to like it, and some people are going to hate it, at least publicly to earn a little more attention. Which leads me to a curious question I have:

SS, in your opinion, have you met any media members who have taken a different stance publicly for more attention, but actually side with a more reasonable take in private? I'm sure it could be possible, but it'd be hard to prove, because if they had an outlandish take on a story they'd stick with that viewpoint throughout so they wouldn't appear phony.
mooby is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:39 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site is not officially affiliated with the Washington Redskins or the NFL.
Page generated in 0.26869 seconds with 9 queries

Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0 RC5

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25