Warpath  

Home | Forums | Salary Cap Info | Shop | Donate | Stay Connected




Go Back   Warpath > Redskins Forums > Redskins Locker Room


Skins v Eagles post game thread

Redskins Locker Room


View Poll Results: Most disappointing part of the loss to the Eagles?
Turnovers/penalties 42 38.89%
Poor tackling 27 25.00%
Offensive struggles 33 30.56%
Other 6 5.56%
Voters: 108. You may not vote on this poll

Closed Thread
 
LinkBack (1) Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 09-11-2013, 01:49 PM   #301
Playmaker
 
KI Skins Fan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: MD Eastern Shore
Posts: 2,550
Re: Skins v Eagles post game thread

Quote:
Originally Posted by mredskins View Post
I said food thought he said NOT even a thought meaning he knows something.

And you are using hindsight.

It is not to crazy to think KC goes on to have a good/great career and RG's career is marred with injury.
I said "NOT!" meaning I strongly believe that the Redskins should be committed to RGIII as their QB without any reservations or second thoughts.
__________________
Hope Springs Eternal
KI Skins Fan is offline  

Advertisements
Old 09-11-2013, 01:53 PM   #302
Registered User
 
firstdown's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: chesapeake, va
Age: 50
Posts: 15,818
Re: Skins v Eagles post game thread

Quote:
Originally Posted by skinsguy View Post
Here is something very interesting I found. While the Eagles fans are all euphoric over Monday Night's win, I was curious to see what the similarities were between Steve Spurrier's first regular season game with the Redskins and Chip Kelly's first game with the Eagles. Here are the stats:

Spurrier's first game: 73 plays, 442 yards of total offense and 31 points.
Chip Kelly's first game: 77 plays,443 yards of total offense and 33 points.

Almost identical numbers in plays, yardage and points. Of course the Eagles win seems more impressive since they scored most of their points in a half, and it was against the division champs. The Redskins' win was against the Cardinals. Still, not a whole lot of difference between the two, though. Both were/are supposed to be offensive geniuses. Other similarities I found is that Spurrier's offense seemed to expose the quarterback to a lot of hits. Kelly's seems to also have that issue - especially once the offense tires and the "foot if lifted off the gas". Any quarterback with less elusiveness is going to get killed - at least from my observation.

That's why any talk (I know it's not here but you know everybody else in football land will be talking) of the Eagles' being a scary team that's going to transform the NFL is way pre-mature. I still have my doubts - especially since it fizzled out in the second half. Most certainly, I could be wrong, but Philly is going to have prove that to me throughout the season.
You only posted half of the numbers between the two coaches. The other knock on Spurrier was that neglected the D putting everything into the O. How do the defensive numbers compare?
firstdown is offline  
Old 09-11-2013, 01:58 PM   #303
Gamebreaker
 
Chico23231's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Richmond, VA
Age: 37
Posts: 12,596
Re: Skins v Eagles post game thread

Quote:
Originally Posted by KI Skins Fan View Post
I said "NOT!" meaning I strongly believe that the Redskins should be committed to RGIII as their QB without any reservations or second thoughts.
Borat - Not Joke | Free Video Clips | SPIKE

please reference these NOT joke directions please


After reading your post I was inspired to post something like Cousins should be starting and then type "psyche"
__________________
Boycott Rolling Stone Magazine
Chico23231 is offline  
Old 09-11-2013, 02:00 PM   #304
‎\m/
 
Mattyk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 42
Posts: 83,509
Re: Skins v Eagles post game thread

This thing about Griffin not wanting to run the RO is bugging me.

Plus can we stop saying we have a read option based offense? It's a play-action based system. A play we ran 8 times per game doesn't equate to a base system.

The read option isn't off the table. Otherwise why did they practice it so much and ran it a bunch in preseason games with White?

It's definitely still in the game plan, but depending on game situations sometimes it will be called more often, sometimes less.

We fell behind early against Philly and couldn't get anything going. The RO isn't a threat when the other team knows you're in catchup mode and are going to pass every play.

Too many people are falling into the trap of looking at the results of one game and drawing hardline conclusions about how the other 15 games are going to go.
__________________
Support The Warpath! | Warpath Shop
Mattyk is offline  
Old 09-11-2013, 02:03 PM   #305
Franchise Player
 
mredskins's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 8,837
Re: Skins v Eagles post game thread

Quote:
Originally Posted by KI Skins Fan View Post
I said "NOT!" meaning I strongly believe that the Redskins should be committed to RGIII as their QB without any reservations or second thoughts.
Fair enough.

And I agree at this point you ride the RGIII bus but another major knee injury and the KC bus will start showing up in the rear view mirror.
__________________
When life gives you paper jams, turn them into paper footballs!
mredskins is offline  
Old 09-11-2013, 02:17 PM   #306
Living Legend
 
Monkeydad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: PA
Age: 35
Posts: 16,275
Re: Skins v Eagles post game thread

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mattyk View Post
This thing about Griffin not wanting to run the RO is bugging me.

Plus can we stop saying we have a read option based offense? It's a play-action based system. A play we ran 8 times per game doesn't equate to a base system.

The read option isn't off the table. Otherwise why did they practice it so much and ran it a bunch in preseason games with White?

It's definitely still in the game plan, but depending on game situations sometimes it will be called more often, sometimes less.

We fell behind early against Philly and couldn't get anything going. The RO isn't a threat when the other team knows you're in catchup mode and are going to pass every play.

Too many people are falling into the trap of looking at the results of one game and drawing hardline conclusions about how the other 15 games are going to go.

Completely right.

We'd be foolish to abandon the offense that had us ranked #1 in the league in rushing and 5th overall.


Did any of you ever think that perhaps we went with a simple game plan for RGIII's first game back not just to protect him, but to ease him back in? Even with a simple playbook, he still struggled. He just needed (needs) rep and once his rhythm and confidence back, we'll roll out everything we ran last season.

And as Matty said, we fell behind and had to abandon the run game to get back into the game, which we did.

The read option did not get him injured, trying to run through defenders on scrambles instead of getting down our to the sidelines did.

Griffin is one of the most competitive players in the league. Why wouldn't he want to run what works?
__________________
Not sent from a Droid, iPhone, Blackberry or toaster
Monkeydad is offline  
Old 09-11-2013, 02:37 PM   #307
Contains football related knowledge
 
JoeRedskin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Second Star On The Right
Age: 51
Posts: 8,851
Re: Skins v Eagles post game thread

At his press conference followng the game, Griffin was asked if he had gotten more comfortable in the second half and if that was the reason for the improvement. In describing the offensive woes and the improvements in the second half, Griffin responded with his "can't-get-rights" comment and followed that by saying the team used the passing game to get a spark in the second half.

He then made the remark "but that's not who we are as a team" and talked about getting the run game fixed. Not sure how that fits into the RO debate but it struck me as a recognition that we are a run oriented team first and that he buys into that.
__________________
You aren't worth the water in my spit but, maybe, just maybe, you're worth the lead in my shotgun.
JoeRedskin is offline  
Old 09-11-2013, 02:51 PM   #308
‎\m/
 
Mattyk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 42
Posts: 83,509
Re: Skins v Eagles post game thread

Quote:
Originally Posted by JoeRedskin View Post
At his press conference followng the game, Griffin was asked if he had gotten more comfortable in the second half and if that was the reason for the improvement. In describing the offensive woes and the improvements in the second half, Griffin responded with his "can't-get-rights" comment and followed that by saying the team used the passing game to get a spark in the second half.

He then made the remark "but that's not who we are as a team" and talked about getting the run game fixed. Not sure how that fits into the RO debate but it struck me as a recognition that we are a run oriented team first and that he buys into that.
After leading the league in rushing last year it's quite obvious the type of team we are. The run sets up everything in this offense.
__________________
Support The Warpath! | Warpath Shop
Mattyk is offline  
Old 09-11-2013, 03:01 PM   #309
Gamebreaker
 
CRedskinsRule's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Pasadena, Md
Age: 47
Posts: 12,881
Re: Skins v Eagles post game thread

Quote:
Originally Posted by firstdown View Post
You only posted half of the numbers between the two coaches. The other knock on Spurrier was that neglected the D putting everything into the O. How do the defensive numbers compare?
Spurrier vs Kelly

PTS........ 23...... 27
FD......... 14...... 25
TotYds.. 257...... 382
PassYds. 187....... 308
RushYds. 70...... 74
TO.......... 1...... 3
CRedskinsRule is offline  
Old 09-11-2013, 03:09 PM   #310
Living Legend
 
skinsfaninok's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Oklahoma City (Originally from Biloxi, Ms)
Age: 27
Posts: 16,356
Re: Skins v Eagles post game thread

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mattyk View Post
This thing about Griffin not wanting to run the RO is bugging me.

Plus can we stop saying we have a read option based offense? It's a play-action based system. A play we ran 8 times per game doesn't equate to a base system.

The read option isn't off the table. Otherwise why did they practice it so much and ran it a bunch in preseason games with White?

It's definitely still in the game plan, but depending on game situations sometimes it will be called more often, sometimes less.

We fell behind early against Philly and couldn't get anything going. The RO isn't a threat when the other team knows you're in catchup mode and are going to pass every play.

Too many people are falling into the trap of looking at the results of one game and drawing hardline conclusions about how the other 15 games are going to go.


yeah I think we'll see more RO sunday wouldn't u think?
__________________
THUNDER UP

"if you're good at something, never do it for free"- The Joker

skinsfaninok is offline  
Old 09-11-2013, 03:12 PM   #311
‎\m/
 
Mattyk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 42
Posts: 83,509
Re: Skins v Eagles post game thread

Quote:
Originally Posted by skinsfaninok View Post
yeah I think we'll see more RO sunday wouldn't u think?
I would think so as long as we don't get off to another shitty start
__________________
Support The Warpath! | Warpath Shop
Mattyk is offline  
Old 09-11-2013, 03:28 PM   #312
Living Legend
 
skinsfaninok's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Oklahoma City (Originally from Biloxi, Ms)
Age: 27
Posts: 16,356
Re: Skins v Eagles post game thread

yeah no joke, typically before last year I'd say we get smoked this week but for the reason of RG3 alone I'm really confident in this team now and I still believe we win the division.
__________________
THUNDER UP

"if you're good at something, never do it for free"- The Joker

skinsfaninok is offline  
Old 09-11-2013, 03:59 PM   #313
Franchise Player
 
skinsfan69's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Arlington, VA.
Posts: 9,811
Re: Skins v Eagles post game thread

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mattyk View Post
This thing about Griffin not wanting to run the RO is bugging me.

Plus can we stop saying we have a read option based offense? It's a play-action based system. A play we ran 8 times per game doesn't equate to a base system.

The read option isn't off the table. Otherwise why did they practice it so much and ran it a bunch in preseason games with White?

It's definitely still in the game plan, but depending on game situations sometimes it will be called more often, sometimes less.

We fell behind early against Philly and couldn't get anything going. The RO isn't a threat when the other team knows you're in catchup mode and are going to pass every play.

Too many people are falling into the trap of looking at the results of one game and drawing hardline conclusions about how the other 15 games are going to go.
I think from everything that's leaked out, there are hints that he doesn't want to run it. Would you agree with that? We had the ball a few times when the game was close and it was not run.
skinsfan69 is offline  
Old 09-11-2013, 05:41 PM   #314
MVP
 
NC_Skins's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 11,218
Re: Skins v Eagles post game thread

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mattyk View Post
Plus can we stop saying we have a read option based offense? It's a play-action based system.
Maybe I overlooked it, but I haven't seen where we've stated that the read option was our base offense.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mattyk View Post
It's definitely still in the game plan, but depending on game situations sometimes it will be called more often, sometimes less.
I think it's very much in the game plan. You'd be a idiot not to use something that was very effective during games.
__________________
"So let me get this straight. We have the event of the year on TV with millions watching around the world... and people want a punt, pass, and kick competition to be the halftime entertainment?? Folks, don't quit your day jobs."- Matty
NC_Skins is offline  
Old 09-11-2013, 06:27 PM   #315
Uncle Phil
 
SmootSmack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 44,968
Re: Skins v Eagles post game thread

Quote:
Originally Posted by NC_Skins View Post
Maybe I overlooked it, but I haven't seen where we've stated that the read option was our base offense.
.
Read what you wrote on post #288
__________________
You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You
SmootSmack is offline  
Closed Thread

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:35 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site is not officially affiliated with the Washington Redskins or the NFL.
Page generated in 0.31919 seconds with 10 queries

Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0 RC5

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25