Warpath  

Home | Forums | Salary Cap Info | Shop | Donate | Stay Connected




Go Back   Warpath > Redskins Forums > Redskins Locker Room


For better or for worse

Redskins Locker Room


Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 04-05-2005, 03:02 PM   #16
I like big (_|_)s.
 
TheMalcolmConnection's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Lexington, Virginia
Age: 33
Posts: 17,643
Re: For better or for worse

Definitely. That's why I keep advocating taking Williams in the first. I think the guy is a natural playmaker and, unlike popular opinion, I think he will make an immediate impact.
__________________
Regret nothing. At one time it was exactly what you wanted.
TheMalcolmConnection is offline   Reply With Quote

Advertisements
Old 04-05-2005, 04:07 PM   #17
Pro Bowl
 
BigSKINBauer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Washington, DC
Age: 26
Posts: 5,637
Re: For better or for worse

r we better than last year in my opinion..... yes. but it does seem that others in the division had better offseasons and addressed their needs, namely dallas. I know that bledso is a major upgrade. I mean TESTICLES couldn't throw anything last yr. they got picks early in the draft, and will improve more. We did well but even the giants got better wr w/ plexco and took pierce, we can't compare w/ the eagles so lets not they got draft picks off the wazoo.
I think this adds to the fact that we are in the best division in the league we are rivalled by the broncos, raiders, chiefs, and chargers division but wait we play them too this year so we best be at the top of our game.
BigSKINBauer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-05-2005, 04:10 PM   #18
I like big (_|_)s.
 
TheMalcolmConnection's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Lexington, Virginia
Age: 33
Posts: 17,643
Re: For better or for worse

I think other teams had adequate offseasons. I do however, think that Bledsoe is going to flop for Dallas. He loves to throw picks and he can't take a hit. I'm excited to play him.
__________________
Regret nothing. At one time it was exactly what you wanted.
TheMalcolmConnection is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-05-2005, 04:31 PM   #19
Impact Rookie
 
ST21's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Texas
Posts: 519
Re: For better or for worse

Daseal...you mean if Springs stays healthy for the whole season.....the league is getting bigger not smaller, and weather pac man is a impact db, he can't be put in situation were he's match against a big WR....I agree with MC...we will be better of getting Williams
ST21 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-05-2005, 04:33 PM   #20
I like big (_|_)s.
 
TheMalcolmConnection's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Lexington, Virginia
Age: 33
Posts: 17,643
Re: For better or for worse

Don't get me wrong though, if Williams isn't available, I would be completely happy with Rolle (especially) or Pac-Man. I think that Williams is one of the few guaranteed playmakers in the draft.
__________________
Regret nothing. At one time it was exactly what you wanted.
TheMalcolmConnection is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-05-2005, 07:43 PM   #21
What will Shanny do this offseason?
 
diehardskin2982's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 3,402
Re: For better or for worse

corners come and go in the NFL and who knows maybe we'll sign law or something... (not likely) but we do need an impact wideout who can take control in the redzone.
__________________
That got ugly fast
diehardskin2982 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-06-2005, 04:35 AM   #22
Special Teams
 
jrocx69's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Dallas
Age: 33
Posts: 461
Re: For better or for worse

williams will be gone, tampa or minnesota is going to get him, and the rest of the upper wr class is gonna be a stretch at 9. im hoping for merriman or rogers in the first... and bartell (cb howard) or canty (de virginia) or possibly henry (wr west virginia) in the third rd.
jrocx69 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-06-2005, 09:53 AM   #23
Playmaker
 
Defensewins's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 2,939
Re: For better or for worse

Quote:
Originally Posted by diehardskin2982
corners come and go in the NFL and who knows maybe we'll sign law or something... (not likely) but we do need an impact wideout who can take control in the redzone.
IMO it is the other way around. WR are a dime a dozen. Good, young CB's are not alwasy available in such great numbers.
Look how many great (probowl) WR's were available to the highest bidder and switched teams in just last two offseasons:

1) Terrel Owens, SF
2) Randy Moss, MIN
3) Mushin Muhamad. CAR
5) Plaxico Burress, Pitt
6) Jerry Porter, OAK
7) Keenan McCardel, TB
8) Lav. Coles, Wash
9) Santana Moss, Jets
10) Jerry Rice, Oak
11) David Boston, San Diego
12) Justin McCareins, TEN
13) Joey Galloway, TB
14) Curtis Conway, CHI
15) Kevin Dyson

This is just to name a few, there are more. This list is a virtual who's who of NFL WR's. The top 8 on this list are perenial probowlers players. Moss and T.O. are probably the best WR's in the NFL.
Some of these WR's switched teams for little or no compensation (T.O. for example).
Defensewins is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-06-2005, 11:04 AM   #24
Puppy Kicker
 
Daseal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Arlington, Virginia
Age: 31
Posts: 8,237
Re: For better or for worse

I still think MN wants DJ if he's there.
__________________
Best. Player. Available.
Daseal is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:13 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site is not officially affiliated with the Washington Redskins or the NFL.
Page generated in 0.19337 seconds with 9 queries

Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0 RC5

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25