Warpath  

Home | Forums | Salary Cap Info | Shop | Donate | Stay Connected




Go Back   Warpath > Redskins Forums > Redskins Locker Room


Bugel Dropping Hint's?

Redskins Locker Room


Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 03-27-2004, 08:35 PM   #1
Registered User
 
offiss's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: sparta, new jersey [ northern jersey ]
Age: 50
Posts: 3,097
Bugel Dropping Hint's?

In his press confrence bugel said that they use the TE in this system as essentially a 3rd tackle rarely catching a pass, where as the H back is the guy catching passes essentially an all around player, the question is, would this be the way winslow should and could be used, I guess the guy's talented enough to do just about anything offensively, but would this really maximize his talent's and if not it's defiently not worth drafting him at #5, as for william's comment's it sound's like to me the way he interchanges the defensive scheme's and has guy's all over the place, would make me think he's salavating to get a player like taylor in his defense, as well it sound's like to me that william's would be able to really maximize taylor's abilities in his defense, IMO he would maximize his production BIG TIME! I think that's what we are lining up to do, drafting taylor!
offiss is offline   Reply With Quote

Advertisements
Old 03-27-2004, 09:44 PM   #2
Special Teams
 
rome108's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Florida
Posts: 155
I read somewhere that even though the Skins matched the offer for Bryan Johnson, they may still try to trade him. Here's an idea, how about getting a 4th rounder for him, then sending the 4th and our 5th and NEXT year's 1st to Detriot or Cleveland for their 1st this year and drafting BOTH Winslow, Jr. and Taylor? Then our Superbowl team is complete. Just an idea.
rome108 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-27-2004, 09:56 PM   #3
Playmaker
 
cpayne5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 3,807
I don't know if we have enough cap room to accomplish signing two first rounders. Maybe if Trotter's trade inquiries are successful...
cpayne5 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-27-2004, 10:01 PM   #4
The Starter
 
Hail to the Redskins's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 1,558
There is NO way Detroit or Cleveland would give up a top-10 pick for NEXT year's 1st and a 4th and 5th this year... no way. BUT... good thinking... that'd be a good plan if it had a chance of happening.
__________________
“Sometimes it is not enough to our best; we must do what is required.”
- Sir Winston Churchill (1874-1965)
Hail to the Redskins is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-27-2004, 10:11 PM   #5
Special Teams
 
Ghost's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 298
Seriously. Can you imagine how pissed you'd be if our FO pulled a move like that? In the old days they used to tar-and-feather people for lesser offenses.

Last edited by Ghost; 03-27-2004 at 10:15 PM.
Ghost is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-27-2004, 10:14 PM   #6
Special Teams
 
Ghost's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 298
I'd expect that most of what the coaches are saying is a smoke screen to mask our draft strategy, so Bugel may have been trying to fool people or (more likely) he let one slip there. I hope no one moves up to steal Taylor from us.
Ghost is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-28-2004, 01:00 AM   #7
Camp Scrub
 
hank64's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Centreville, VA
Posts: 63
From what I've read in other places so far, the real threat to jump us and grab Taylor were the Lions, and they just picked up Brock Marion.
hank64 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-28-2004, 03:04 PM   #8
Special Teams
 
Carnage's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 470
I was surprised at that contract...he is getting old. They might use him to mentor taylor. BUT Detriot has yet to address their running back needs. (Shawn Bryson aside) Mariucci's best succes was when Hearst and Garner were really running well. I see them going RB.
Carnage is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-28-2004, 11:28 PM   #9
Camp Scrub
 
JoeGibbsIsBack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 31
I wouldn't mind Winslow but with the Johnson offer matched I doubt he's gonna be here. I dislike the Taylor move because I like Ohalate at safety and he's improved every game he's been out there.
JoeGibbsIsBack is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-28-2004, 11:37 PM   #10
Pro Bowl
 
SKINSnCANES's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: New Jersey
Age: 32
Posts: 5,427
Ohalate has improved but look what he has done compared to what Roy Williams and Ed Reed have done. Or what Todd Heap and Shockey did. Winslow or Taylor would be a huge upgrade. I watched all of the Canes games last year and I cant say enough about those two. If you dont know much about Taylor know this, becuase of him alone VT threw less than five passes against the Canes and in general teams hardly threw against the Canes. Winslow is a complete player, hes got as good of hands as Fitzgerald in my opinion but how many times did you see Fitzergald level a LB on a sweep.
__________________
"I'm used to winning, coming from the University of Miami. " Clinton Portis
SKINSnCANES is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-29-2004, 03:19 AM   #11
Registered User
 
offiss's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: sparta, new jersey [ northern jersey ]
Age: 50
Posts: 3,097
Quote:
Originally Posted by SKINSnCANES
Ohalate has improved but look what he has done compared to what Roy Williams and Ed Reed have done. Or what Todd Heap and Shockey did. Winslow or Taylor would be a huge upgrade. I watched all of the Canes games last year and I cant say enough about those two. If you dont know much about Taylor know this, becuase of him alone VT threw less than five passes against the Canes and in general teams hardly threw against the Canes. Winslow is a complete player, hes got as good of hands as Fitzgerald in my opinion but how many times did you see Fitzergald level a LB on a sweep.
Tell me is the reason that these team's don't throw against the cane's because of taylor? or a very good front 4 pass rush?
offiss is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-29-2004, 03:58 PM   #12
Pro Bowl
 
SKINSnCANES's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: New Jersey
Age: 32
Posts: 5,427
Definitly because of Taylor. They didnt give up many rushing yards year either because of the multiple sets of four man fronts. When teams passed they ran screens. It seems hard to beleive but Taylor was there to break up almost every play.
__________________
"I'm used to winning, coming from the University of Miami. " Clinton Portis
SKINSnCANES is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-29-2004, 07:20 PM   #13
Special Teams
 
Carnage's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 470
With McNabb, Owens and Shockey in the conference, Taylor makes too much sense.
Carnage is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-29-2004, 08:31 PM   #14
The Starter
 
joecrisp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Charlottesville, VA
Age: 38
Posts: 1,501
Quote:
Originally Posted by Carnage
With McNabb, Owens and Shockey in the conference, Taylor makes too much sense.
That's an excellent point, Carnage. Add Keyshawn to that list, too.
joecrisp is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-29-2004, 08:40 PM   #15
Propane and propane accessories
 
JWsleep's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Houston, TX
Age: 45
Posts: 4,618
But with Joe Gibbs in the conference, a game-breaking young H-back makes too much sense!

I guess we'll keep knocking this one around and around until they finally say:
"And with the 5th pick in the draft, the Washington Redskins select..."
__________________
Hail from Houston!
JWsleep is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:28 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site is not officially affiliated with the Washington Redskins or the NFL.
Page generated in 0.30012 seconds with 9 queries

Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0 RC5

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25