Warpath  

Home | Forums | Salary Cap Info | Shop | Donate | Stay Connected




Go Back   Warpath > Redskins Forums > Redskins Locker Room


QB controversey in 2005?

Redskins Locker Room


View Poll Results: True/False: The Redskins are headed for yet another QB controversey in 2005
True 39 36.11%
False 69 63.89%
Voters: 108. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 04-26-2005, 04:22 PM   #1
‎\m/
 
Mattyk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 41
Posts: 80,427
QB controversey in 2005?

vote and discuss
Mattyk is offline   Reply With Quote

Advertisements
Old 04-26-2005, 04:25 PM   #2
I like big (_|_)s.
 
TheMalcolmConnection's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Lexington, Virginia
Age: 32
Posts: 17,463
Re: QB controversey in 2005?

I'm voting NOT for 2005, but I think there will be on in 2006. Either Ramsey will or will not get it done this year and that will leave us looking at other options. Gibbs has said it's Ramsey's year this year, so I think he will stand by that.

I think 2006 will be a VERY different story.
__________________
Regret nothing. At one time it was exactly what you wanted.
TheMalcolmConnection is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-26-2005, 04:26 PM   #3
Special Teams
 
Red Robert's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Charlotte, NC
Age: 44
Posts: 306
Re: QB controversey in 2005?

Wow good poll I think, I vote yes. Redskins fans by nature expect more from their team. If Ramsey starts off well and the Redskins stay in the hunt this is less likely. However I think the first time Ramsey throws an interception or two the Campbell chants will start. We have seen the same thing so many times in the past it is hard to believe it wont happen again.
Red Robert is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-26-2005, 04:27 PM   #4
Special Teams
 
Red Robert's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Charlotte, NC
Age: 44
Posts: 306
Re: QB controversey in 2005?

Malcolm this is one of the few times I have ever disagreed with one of your takes...!!

Brunell vs. Ramsey
Even HASSELBECK.

Johnson vs. George

Schrader vs. Williams

Schuler vs. MY MOTHER IN LAW
Red Robert is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-26-2005, 04:31 PM   #5
I like big (_|_)s.
 
TheMalcolmConnection's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Lexington, Virginia
Age: 32
Posts: 17,463
Re: QB controversey in 2005?

The main reason I stick behind this opinion is because Gibbs left Brunell in it until the bitter end. ALSO, in camp, Gibbs said it would be an open competition with Brunell and Ramsey, this year he said it is Ramsey's year.
__________________
Regret nothing. At one time it was exactly what you wanted.
TheMalcolmConnection is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-26-2005, 04:32 PM   #6
Special Teams
 
bjschmonsees's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Bethesda, MD
Age: 43
Posts: 323
Re: QB controversey in 2005?

Unless Ramsey really stinks up FedEx, there will be no controversy next year!
bjschmonsees is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-26-2005, 04:34 PM   #7
Special Teams
 
Red Robert's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Charlotte, NC
Age: 44
Posts: 306
Re: QB controversey in 2005?

I feel you, Gibbs is known as a man of his word but he also must have a lot of faith in Campbell to take the risk on him. I really think if we are 2-6 by midseason we will see a switch. Would you make a switch? At what point?
Red Robert is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-26-2005, 04:35 PM   #8
Karma Chameleon (I come and go)
 
jdlea's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Annapolis, MD
Age: 29
Posts: 3,087
Re: QB controversey in 2005?

My gut says there will be and that's all I'm going on from now on.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by SmootSmack
Albert Connell is perhaps the worst Redskin I ever had the misfortune of meeting. He's the kind of guy that makes media people covering their favorite team growing up no longer like that team
jdlea is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-26-2005, 04:42 PM   #9
New HC, new hope!
 
RedskinRat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: I'm in LA, trick!
Posts: 8,702
Re: QB controversey in 2005?

I agree with Malcolm Connection. If Ramsey slips this season then it's be civil war at Redskins park pre 2006 season.

I don't see Ramsey failing this year. He'll be fine.
RedskinRat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-26-2005, 04:51 PM   #10
The Starter
 
joethiesmanfan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,163
Re: QB controversey in 2005?

now if ramsey gets hurt people are gonna have to tie brunnell down to keep gibbs from putting him in the game then it will be a QB controversy. i dont ever ever ever ever ever wanna see brunnell on the field with a Redskins jersey on and the ball in his hands not even holding for kicks. if Ramsey does not get hurt its sink or swim with Ramsey evaluate after the season no excuses.
joethiesmanfan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-26-2005, 04:52 PM   #11
Fight for old DC!
 
Redskins_P's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Falls Church, VA
Age: 36
Posts: 4,085
Re: QB controversey in 2005?

I said No, but that just because I don't want one.
Redskins_P is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-26-2005, 04:53 PM   #12
Camp Scrub
 
CROOKEDSKINS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: KEY WEST FL
Age: 41
Posts: 93
Re: QB controversey in 2005?

I voted no.I think Ramsey will start the season and have a solid year.
Its nice to see in the interviews hes had that he says that this is his team and hes the starter.Maybe if he would have done this last year we wouldnt have had to go through 9 weeks of hell.
CROOKEDSKINS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-26-2005, 04:56 PM   #13
Playmaker
 
BDBohnzie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Frederick, MD
Age: 35
Posts: 4,458
Re: QB controversey in 2005?

Ramsey is going in as #1, so there is no controversy. He will start the season as #1, take all the 1st team reps in camp, etc.

if he does poorly, it wont cause a controversy to bring in Brunell...because it is expected.
__________________
Bad Things man, I mean bad things...

“WE TOOK HIM IN THE SIXTH ROUND SO WE'RE NOT SMART EITHER.” - Shanny on what the Skins saw in Alfred Morris
BDBohnzie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-26-2005, 04:58 PM   #14
Camp Scrub
 
Grayacre's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Arlington
Posts: 35
Re: QB controversey in 2005?

There won't be a controversy b/c it's quite clear already that Gibbs will pull the rug out from under Ramsey at the first opportunity. Campbell is just the latest manifestation of Gibbs' total lack of confidence in Ramsey. It's a shame, really ...
Grayacre is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-26-2005, 05:06 PM   #15
Impact Rookie
 
memphisskin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 42
Posts: 958
Re: QB controversey in 2005?

Unfortunately yes. If Ramsey or the offense struggles this year, there will be clamors from many to see the rookie in there. Of course, rookie qbs normally lose (the exception that proves the rule-Roethlisburger). I'd rather see Campbell come in and learn the offense and the team before he hits the field, but this is the NFL so I'm sure he'll get an opportunity sooner rather than later, which does not bode well for us because that will mean that Ramsey is either struggling or hurt.
memphisskin is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:48 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site is not officially affiliated with the Washington Redskins or the NFL.
Page generated in 0.28305 seconds with 10 queries

Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0 RC5

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25