Warpath  

Home | Forums | Salary Cap Info | Shop | Donate | Stay Connected




Go Back   Warpath > Redskins Forums > Redskins Locker Room


R.W. McQuarters

Redskins Locker Room


Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 05-26-2005, 10:16 PM   #46
I like big (_|_)s.
 
TheMalcolmConnection's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Lexington, Virginia
Age: 32
Posts: 17,541
Re: R.W. McQuarters

What I'm saying is based on what WAS available this offseason, we had one of the better offseasons in the league. Getting a stud doesn't define a great offseason. Prior to Gibbs coming back we had plenty of "studs" we took in the offseason and many would rate those as the poorest choices we could have taken. Could we have pursued Moss? Sure, but the price that would go along with him monetarily would have been great. Yes, we might have gotten a stud, but I don't think I would have categorized this offseason as great.

BUT, like I said before, it's VERY subjective.
__________________
Regret nothing. At one time it was exactly what you wanted.
TheMalcolmConnection is offline   Reply With Quote

Advertisements
Old 05-27-2005, 03:36 AM   #47
Franchise Player
 
Sheriff Gonna Getcha's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 35
Posts: 8,317
Re: R.W. McQuarters

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mattyk72
Depth, depth and more depth.

With a D-line that can't be relied upon to generate much pressure on their own, it's critical that Williams has plenty of depth and versatility in his secondary. McQuarters would be a nice sign, plus he can return kicks.
Exactly Matty. I couldn't have said it any better.
Sheriff Gonna Getcha is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-27-2005, 03:40 AM   #48
Franchise Player
 
Sheriff Gonna Getcha's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 35
Posts: 8,317
Re: R.W. McQuarters

No one is saying McQuarters is some stud. But, he'll add depth to a position that requires depth. Williams' system requires at least 3 solid corners (about half of his plays involve 3 CBs). With Rogers, Springs, Harris, McQuarters and youngsters Wilds and Brown, we've got a nice (but not too expensive) stable of corners.
Sheriff Gonna Getcha is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-27-2005, 09:04 AM   #49
Camp Scrub
 
W_REDSKINS's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 19
Re: R.W. McQuarters

Quote:
Originally Posted by skinnyfan
We are NOT going to get him for the league minimum...........he is a player! and will demand a little bit of coin, McQuarters would be a starter right away on the defense!
Uhmm... Ok?
W_REDSKINS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-27-2005, 09:07 AM   #50
Camp Scrub
 
W_REDSKINS's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 19
Re: R.W. McQuarters

Quote:
Originally Posted by RedskinRat
Nice overreaction. Didn't the press conference address other issues too?
Who said anything about the press conference?
W_REDSKINS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-27-2005, 09:18 AM   #51
Camp Scrub
 
W_REDSKINS's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 19
Re: R.W. McQuarters

Quote:
Originally Posted by cpayne5
For the simple fact that GWilliams and Co have interest in him. If they think that he will be a good addition to the team, why should we question him? Maybe they actually know what they're doing; after all they did turn our D into one of the more feared units in the league last year.
OK... So not at all like the Alex Molden, Ralph Brown situation last year, or the short but sweet Redskins career of Cory " possible replacement for Sean Taylor " Hall, right?

Thank you for clearing that up.
W_REDSKINS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-27-2005, 09:55 AM   #52
‎\m/
 
Mattyk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 41
Posts: 81,855
Re: R.W. McQuarters

Let's be clear here, Hall asked for his release, so let's not pin this on the team as a bad move.
__________________
Support The Warpath! | Warpath Shop
Mattyk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-27-2005, 10:03 AM   #53
Playmaker
 
cpayne5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 3,807
Re: R.W. McQuarters

Quote:
Originally Posted by W_REDSKINS
OK... So not at all like the Alex Molden, Ralph Brown situation last year, or the short but sweet Redskins career of Cory " possible replacement for Sean Taylor " Hall, right?

Thank you for clearing that up.
So you don't like the way the defense is being managed?
__________________
"It's not about what you've done, but what's been done for you."
cpayne5 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-27-2005, 10:09 AM   #54
‎\m/
 
Mattyk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 41
Posts: 81,855
Re: R.W. McQuarters

Quote:
Originally Posted by cpayne5
So you don't like the way the defense is being managed?
Apparently every move the team makes has to be a homerun, otherwise it's a total failure and a lack of competence by the front office.
__________________
Support The Warpath! | Warpath Shop
Mattyk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-27-2005, 10:25 AM   #55
Camp Scrub
 
W_REDSKINS's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 19
Re: R.W. McQuarters

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mattyk72
Let's be clear here, Hall asked for his release, so let's not pin this on the team as a bad move.
Who`s pinning anything on the team? Did I say it was a BAD move?
W_REDSKINS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-27-2005, 10:31 AM   #56
Camp Scrub
 
W_REDSKINS's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 19
Re: R.W. McQuarters

Quote:
Originally Posted by cpayne5
So you don't like the way the defense is being managed?
Where did you read that?
W_REDSKINS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-27-2005, 10:33 AM   #57
‎\m/
 
Mattyk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 41
Posts: 81,855
Re: R.W. McQuarters

So what exactly is your take here, W_Redskins??
__________________
Support The Warpath! | Warpath Shop
Mattyk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-27-2005, 10:41 AM   #58
Playmaker
 
cpayne5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 3,807
Re: R.W. McQuarters

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mattyk72
So what exactly is your take here, W_Redskins??
Yeah, really.
__________________
"It's not about what you've done, but what's been done for you."
cpayne5 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-27-2005, 10:44 AM   #59
Playmaker
 
cpayne5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 3,807
Re: R.W. McQuarters

Quote:
Originally Posted by W_REDSKINS
Where did you read that?
Well, it seems that you don't like any of the defensive decisions made regarding the players we've talked about here, which would mean you don't like the way the D is being managed.

You're not making any sense.
__________________
"It's not about what you've done, but what's been done for you."
cpayne5 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-27-2005, 10:52 AM   #60
Special Teams
 
RedskinsJunkie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Connecticut
Age: 38
Posts: 128
Re: R.W. McQuarters

Quote:
Originally Posted by TheMalcolmConnection
What I'm saying is based on what WAS available this offseason, we had one of the better offseasons in the league. Getting a stud doesn't define a great offseason. Prior to Gibbs coming back we had plenty of "studs" we took in the offseason and many would rate those as the poorest choices we could have taken. Could we have pursued Moss? Sure, but the price that would go along with him monetarily would have been great. Yes, we might have gotten a stud, but I don't think I would have categorized this offseason as great.

BUT, like I said before, it's VERY subjective.
We used to get OLD Studs past their prime... I think YES we finally got away from that...
__________________
Jimoh--- OH NO!
RedskinsJunkie is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:47 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site is not officially affiliated with the Washington Redskins or the NFL.
Page generated in 0.30578 seconds with 9 queries

Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0 RC5

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25