Home | Forums | Shop | Donate

Go Back   Warpath > Redskins Forums > Redskins Locker Room

Thrash lowers salary cap number

Redskins Locker Room

LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 03-31-2004, 11:07 AM   #16
Thank You, Sean.
Gmanc711's Avatar
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Gaithersburg, MD
Posts: 7,506
Jacobs could be better than Gardner. I think it has to be between Gardner and Jacobs. I dont think McCants ( and dont get me wrong, cause I love this guy), is a #2 type reciver. I just dont think he could excel being a every single down in the game type reciver. I think one of the reasons he can come in and make such big plays, is because he matches up very very well against the guys who will be on him. Does anyone agree?
Gmanc711 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old 03-31-2004, 11:11 AM   #17
Defensewins's Avatar
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 3,324
Originally Posted by skins93
I don't think that's fair to Taylor Jacobs. First off, he was hurt most of the year trying to adjust to the NFL. Second, you could make that same argument for any college player, look great in college but not good enough in the pros.....
Isn't that the pot calling the kettle black!
Because all of you Gardner haters have been so fair to Gardner. Gardner had a good rookie year in the NFL. He proved himself in the NFL! Jacobs has proven nothing in the NFL.
I admit under Spurriers chuck and duck Bullshit college system, Gardner did not play well. However many NFL experts predicted Gardner would not do well in Spurier's system because it does not lend itself to big recievers like Gardner and the system was unproven in the NFL.
Didn't Stephen Davis have the same problem his last year here? He proved with the Panthers that he was not the problem, Spurrier's system was. Is it fair to judge Gardners play during the years we had a bad coach and offensive system? Everyone looked bad!

Last edited by Defensewins; 03-31-2004 at 11:16 AM.
Defensewins is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 03-31-2004, 11:14 AM   #18
Camp Scrub
RTerps2002's Avatar
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: FT Lauderdale Florida
Posts: 33
Personally I think Gardner should be traded before Trotter
RTerps2002 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-31-2004, 11:15 AM   #19
BleedBurgundy's Avatar
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 4,471
Especially Spurrier. I wish I could have helped him pack.
BleedBurgundy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-31-2004, 11:36 AM   #20
jdlea's Avatar
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Annapolis, MD
Posts: 3,105
I don't think Taylor Jacobs has a chance to become the #2 wide reciever. He's just another Gator. No Gators reciever has seen anything more than marginal success in the NFL. None of them dominate and I don't think he'll be any different. Even in the preseason when he was healthy he showed me nothing and it was a system he had just played in 2 years ago. I don't think we should cut him by any means, but I don't think he's got a shot at winning the number 2 spot for the Skins.
jdlea is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-31-2004, 04:15 PM   #21
Pro Bowl
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 5,449
If they say a player has potential after a minicamp practice this year it has a lot more clout than if it was said under the nonchalent practices we held last year. All of our players will be more prepared. It doesnt me they will make the probowl, but it should me we will be able to win more of the close games than we did last year.
"I'm used to winning, coming from the University of Miami. " Clinton Portis
SKINSnCANES is offline   Reply With Quote


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:29 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2018, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site is not officially affiliated with the Washington Redskins or the NFL.
Page generated in 0.04730 seconds with 9 queries

Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0 RC5

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25