Warpath  

Home | Forums | Salary Cap Info | Shop | Donate | Stay Connected




Go Back   Warpath > Redskins Forums > Redskins Locker Room


Further Proof of an Anti Redskins Bias in the National Media

Redskins Locker Room


Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 06-14-2005, 11:16 AM   #16
Special Teams
 
dirtbag2112's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 293
Re: Further Proof of an Anti Redskins Bias in the National Media

haha. "The redskins released Rod Gardner today, one of the most consistant wide recievers in league. Gardner alone will win 5 games for any team willing to pick him up."
dirtbag2112 is offline   Reply With Quote

Advertisements
Old 06-14-2005, 12:33 PM   #17
The Starter
 
dblanch66's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Age: 48
Posts: 1,176
Re: Further Proof of an Anti Redskins Bias in the National Media

I agree with all of you.. AND... when the Redskins start playing well and winning, he'll jump on the bandwagon and start blowing Gibbs and saying he's the greatest coach..etc. What a tit.
dblanch66 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-14-2005, 12:35 PM   #18
Puppy Kicker
 
Daseal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Arlington, Virginia
Age: 31
Posts: 8,238
Re: Further Proof of an Anti Redskins Bias in the National Media

Quote:
Antonio Brown (8.9 yds) and James Thrash (8.5 yds) did much better on punt returns than Morton (6.2 yds). Betts was better (23.0 yds) on Kickoffs than Morton (22.4) Morton only had one good kickoff return return during his tenure here. That one being the TD against the Saints in 2003. Antonio Brown also had a return for 66 yds and Ladell Betts had one for 70 yards. Morton's long? 49 yards. Cutting Morton was a great move.
Hard to compare two different special teams coaches like this. Is Morton a top 5? No. Could we do worse - yes. Antonio Brown doesn't have a whole lot in the way of moves, but when you have the speed he has it's not really that important!
__________________
Best. Player. Available.
Daseal is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-14-2005, 12:53 PM   #19
Playmaker
 
Longtimefan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Germantown, Md.
Posts: 4,832
Re: Further Proof of an Anti Redskins Bias in the National Media

Not sure the stats back this up but, I fell Morton was better as a KO return man than as a punt returner. Last year I recall more than one occasion when there were catchable punt in the air that he let hit the ground and bounce, costing us valuable yards. I always thought that if the punt is in the air and you have a chance to catch it you should, even if you have to fair-catch.
Longtimefan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-14-2005, 01:18 PM   #20
Special Teams
 
bjschmonsees's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Bethesda, MD
Age: 44
Posts: 323
Re: Further Proof of an Anti Redskins Bias in the National Media

Quote:
Originally Posted by Daseal
Hard to compare two different special teams coaches like this. Is Morton a top 5? No. Could we do worse - yes. Antonio Brown doesn't have a whole lot in the way of moves, but when you have the speed he has it's not really that important!
Those were the stats from last year, so they are from the same system and the same coaching staff.

Morton was defintely a better kickoff returner than punt returner.
bjschmonsees is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-14-2005, 01:21 PM   #21
Playmaker
 
celts32's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Hackettstown NJ
Age: 43
Posts: 2,656
Re: Further Proof of an Anti Redskins Bias in the National Media

King quote..."Spurrier will win big"

King is not always anti Redskin but even when he's not he's usually wrong anyway...
celts32 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-14-2005, 02:15 PM   #22
‎\m/
 
Mattyk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 42
Posts: 83,576
Re: Further Proof of an Anti Redskins Bias in the National Media

He also predicted Wuerfell would have a 30 TD season under Spurrier!

How's that for smoking some serious crack! I guess he got caught up in that preseason 49er game.
__________________
Support The Warpath! | Warpath Shop
Mattyk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-14-2005, 02:16 PM   #23
I like big (_|_)s.
 
TheMalcolmConnection's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Lexington, Virginia
Age: 33
Posts: 17,644
Re: Further Proof of an Anti Redskins Bias in the National Media

LOL!!!!!! WOW! I never heard that. The man just is not educated in the ways of sports.
__________________
Regret nothing. At one time it was exactly what you wanted.
TheMalcolmConnection is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-14-2005, 02:32 PM   #24
Pro Bowl
 
skinsguy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Greensboro, North Carolina
Posts: 6,666
Re: Further Proof of an Anti Redskins Bias in the National Media

Classic case of not knowing a team and judging a team by maybe seeing one game - a preseason game at that.
__________________
"Fire Up That Diesel!"
skinsguy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-14-2005, 03:11 PM   #25
Franchise Player
 
Sheriff Gonna Getcha's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 35
Posts: 8,317
Re: Further Proof of an Anti Redskins Bias in the National Media

Actually guys, Peter King doesn't have a beef with the Redskins; he loves Gibbs, thought the trade for Moss was good for us, and correctly thought that the hiring of Gregg Williams was a good move.
Sheriff Gonna Getcha is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-14-2005, 03:24 PM   #26
I like big (_|_)s.
 
TheMalcolmConnection's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Lexington, Virginia
Age: 33
Posts: 17,644
Re: Further Proof of an Anti Redskins Bias in the National Media

Out of all of the bad things he's said however, that gives him a broadcasting record comparable to our football record last year.
__________________
Regret nothing. At one time it was exactly what you wanted.
TheMalcolmConnection is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-14-2005, 03:29 PM   #27
Camp Scrub
 
hotch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Georgetown
Age: 33
Posts: 1
Re: Further Proof of an Anti Redskins Bias in the National Media

PETER KING IS A !@#$%^ WHO NOT ONLY HATES THE REDSKINGS BUT ALSO IS THE SOLE REASON THAT ART MONK IS NOT YET IN THE HALL OF FAME!! PETER KING CAN CONTRACT A HORRIBLE STD FOR ALL I CARE
hotch is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-14-2005, 03:37 PM   #28
The Starter
 
Riggo44's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: San Clemente CA
Age: 41
Posts: 2,389
Re: Further Proof of an Anti Redskins Bias in the National Media

FU-K Peter KING! The guy rights whatever he feels weather or not it's truth.
__________________
Beer is proof that God loves us and wants us to be happy.
Benjamin Franklin
Riggo44 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-14-2005, 04:04 PM   #29
MVP
 
mooby's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: NoVa
Age: 26
Posts: 12,110
Re: Further Proof of an Anti Redskins Bias in the National Media

Let's go Peter King Let's go!
Let's go Peter King Let's go!
man i love that guy's articles, i mean that is sports journalism at it's best. haha sike that bitch should retire for all i care. Okay, so he likes some of the things we've done, but lets face it, wherever there is criticism about the redskins, peter king isn't far to be found.
mooby is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-14-2005, 05:21 PM   #30
Franchise Player
 
Sheriff Gonna Getcha's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 35
Posts: 8,317
Re: Further Proof of an Anti Redskins Bias in the National Media

I actually don't mind Peter King; he's not always right in his predictions (as noted above, but he's smart, articulate, and doesn't appear to have a real bias.

That's more than I can say for Len Pastabelly.
Sheriff Gonna Getcha is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:59 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site is not officially affiliated with the Washington Redskins or the NFL.
Page generated in 0.24997 seconds with 9 queries

Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0 RC5

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25