Warpath  

Home | Forums | Salary Cap Info | Shop | Donate | Stay Connected




Go Back   Warpath > Redskins Forums > Redskins Locker Room


Dr. Z explains why Skins will go 4-12 (sort of)

Redskins Locker Room


Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 09-05-2005, 07:37 PM   #76
Living Legend
 
That Guy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Springfield, VA
Age: 31
Posts: 16,278
Re: Dr. Z explains why Skins will go 4-12 (sort of)

Quote:
Originally Posted by D'BOYZ
ok man basing on your points Jacksonville was the 29th best scoring offense or 2 spots above yours baltimore was 20th those ain't good offenses. Now you say you lost the moyority of your games for less then 7 point.

Lets see of 10 games you lost 7 where for 7 points or less, those games where NYG,DAL,CLE,BAL, CIN,PHI and DAL. if we compare the other teams Bal was 4 out 7 Buff 4 out 7 NYJ 4 out 6. the other lost so few game they aren't worth putting here. And based on your analysis hey Detroit lost 6 out the 10 for 7 or less points so that makes them based on that analysis a top 10 or top 5 Def I mean the lost 6 close games.

And of those 7 loses your team had for less than 7 points only 2 PHI and CIN where top 15 offense and only 2 BAL and PHI had winning record and 1 had .500 CIN the rest where bad offenses and buttom feeders in the league AND YES I'M SAYING DALLAS WAS A BOTTOM FEEDER.

So in conclusion in YOUR point of view Washington was the Third Best defense because it lost 7 games to close margins 4 of those games that they lost with this close margin where vs teams with the same or WORST record I Don't get it if your D was so good and it played vs this crapy team why could't you beat them.

They all had bad offense they had a WORST DEF according to your knowledge why couldn't you beet them but hey a least the game was close.

Man again total yard avergae doesn't say how good your D really was the weren't really challenged and they lost games to teams with same or worst records bad offenses and worst defenses.
wow, you totally missed my point... entirely.. I was saying that no NFL team decides that "this week we're only going to score 7 points, cause thats all we need"... which was in response to your jackassery about how teams somehow decided that they didn't want to score on us and how that was the reason we had a good defense.

Please, if you can't understand what I'm saying, don't post an essay in response to some random arguement you made up... I was also saying that our offense kept our D on the field longer than some of the other teams you mentioned.. notice i said SOME, and I wasn't talking about total yards, i was talking about time of possession. New england, the jets, and pittsburg all have their defenses on the field less than we did... thats all i was saying, i don't know what that rant about offensive rankings and baltimore was in response to, but it doesn't apply to anything I said.

Please stop trolling.
__________________
Who says shameless self promotion is stupid? oh yeah, that was me... Click For Tunes!
That Guy is offline   Reply With Quote

Advertisements
Old 09-05-2005, 07:44 PM   #77
The Starter
 
D'BOYZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 1,363
Re: Dr. Z explains why Skins will go 4-12 (sort of)

Quote:
Originally Posted by That Guy
wow, you totally missed my point... entirely.. I was saying that no NFL team decides that "this week we're only going to score 7 points, cause thats all we need"... which was in response to your jackassery about how teams somehow decided that they didn't want to score on us and how that was the reason we had a good defense.

Please, if you can't understand what I'm saying, don't post an essay in response to some random arguement you made up... I was also saying that our offense kept our D on the field longer than some of the other teams you mentioned.. notice i said SOME, and I wasn't talking about total yards, i was talking about time of possession. New england, the jets, and pittsburg all have their defenses on the field less than we did... thats all i was saying, i don't know what that rant about offensive rankings and baltimore was in response to, but it doesn't apply to anything I said.

Please stop trolling.
Ok man the point about offense came about you argument that those team had Offense that helped their D I pointed that 2 also had a bad Offense and the second point came of your argument that "And most of our games were 3-7 points difference, meaning that other teams didn't exactly get the type of lead where they could be comfortable"

So I pointed with whom you lost in a close margin saying those teams weren't that good.

About time of posesion I'm tired will analize it another day if you need that stat also lol
D'BOYZ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-03-2006, 04:02 PM   #78
‎\m/
 
Mattyk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 41
Posts: 82,560
Re: Dr. Z explains why Skins will go 4-12 (sort of)

Just thought it would be fun to re-visit this thread, 4-12!! LOL
__________________
Support The Warpath! | Warpath Shop
Mattyk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-03-2006, 04:07 PM   #79
I like big (_|_)s.
 
TheMalcolmConnection's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Lexington, Virginia
Age: 33
Posts: 17,577
Re: Dr. Z explains why Skins will go 4-12 (sort of)

Damn. They were close.
__________________
Regret nothing. At one time it was exactly what you wanted.
TheMalcolmConnection is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-03-2006, 04:16 PM   #80
The Starter
 
steveo395's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 1,674
Re: Dr. Z explains why Skins will go 4-12 (sort of)

Quote:
Originally Posted by TheMalcolmConnection
Damn. They were close.
eh, only 6 games off...close enough

and yet he will still keep his job even though he was so wrong about so many teams
steveo395 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-03-2006, 06:12 PM   #81
Impact Rookie
 
ST21's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Texas
Posts: 519
Re: Dr. Z explains why Skins will go 4-12 (sort of)

opinions or like assholes..........seems everyone has one
__________________
SAY HELLO TO THE BAD GUY........
ST21 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-03-2006, 07:28 PM   #82
Special Teams
 
skindogger47's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Age: 33
Posts: 262
Re: Dr. Z explains why Skins will go 4-12 (sort of)

Sports Illustrated writers are like assholes. . . . wait, no they are assholes.
skindogger47 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-03-2006, 09:39 PM   #83
The Starter
 
GoSkins!'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Yorktown, Va
Age: 45
Posts: 1,587
Re: Dr. Z explains why Skins will go 4-12 (sort of)

NFL Experts = Say what everyone else says.
__________________
Not everything that counts can be counted, and not everything that can be counted counts. A. Einstien
GoSkins! is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-04-2006, 12:11 AM   #84
The Starter
 
dblanch66's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Age: 48
Posts: 1,176
Re: Dr. Z explains why Skins will go 4-12 (sort of)

Quote:
Originally Posted by steveo395
eh, only 6 games off...close enough

and yet he will still keep his job even though he was so wrong about so many teams
Exactly. If any of us had that kind of failure rate at our jobs, we'd all be fired. Dr. Zit is a ****ing jack weed.
dblanch66 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-04-2006, 05:34 AM   #85
Quietly Dominating the East
 
Hog1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Naples, Florida
Posts: 9,311
Re: Dr. Z explains why Skins will go 4-12 (sort of)

All those real tall buildings in Las Vegas were built with the money fleeced from people winning 25% of the time (like Dr. Dumbass). I guess 1 out of 4...............isn't so good?
__________________
Goodbye Sean..........Vaya Con Dios
thankyou Joe.......
“God made certain people to play football. He was one of them.” – Joe Gibbs
Hog1 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 01-04-2006, 08:24 AM   #86
MVP
 
12thMan's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: washington, D.C.
Posts: 11,456
Re: Dr. Z explains why Skins will go 4-12 (sort of)

Quote:
Originally Posted by 12thMan
Honestly, I think 10 wins is doable. We were the best 6-10 team in football last year, which could have very, very easily been 9-7, IMO. And this year we have made, IMO, significant improvements on the offense.
I hate to quote myself....but Dr. Z is making me and most of you look like prophets

I also find it interesting how, in this thread, DBoyz constantly questioned our drafting of Jason Campbell and our defensive rankings from last season. Well with the signing of Gregg Williams and the possible departure of the "oh so loyal" Bill Parcels, it's the Cowboys who will have a lot of questions to answer this off-season.

Hail Skins!!
12thMan is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:15 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site is not officially affiliated with the Washington Redskins or the NFL.
Page generated in 0.28616 seconds with 10 queries

Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0 RC5

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25