Warpath  

Home | Forums | Salary Cap Info | Shop | Donate | Stay Connected




Go Back   Warpath > Redskins Forums > Redskins Locker Room


Latest Fanball Mock Draft- Skins trade down to #10

Redskins Locker Room


Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 04-07-2004, 03:49 PM   #1
Camp Scrub
 
raleighskinsfan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 62
Latest Fanball Mock Draft- Skins trade down to #10

http://www.fanball.com/fb/article.cfm/ID.2409

In this mock, we trade down with Texas and pick up Will Smith, DE at #10.
Answer 3 questions for me-
1-In this scenario, would it be too much to hope that we would receive Texas' 2nd round pick also?
2- If we got their second rounder, who might be available still that we would want? Any of the good TE's, LB's or D Linemen?
3- Would we be better off with Will Smith or Kenechi Udeze if we trade down to #10? Can someone who watches alot of college football sound off on that topic? From what I read, Udeze is the better of the 2...
raleighskinsfan is offline   Reply With Quote

Advertisements
Old 04-07-2004, 04:23 PM   #2
Playmaker
 
cpayne5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 3,807
For a team that really wants the #5 pick, a 2nd rounder is not out of the question.
At #10, KWII or Taylor may still be available, considering the needs of the 5-9 teams. We could still probably get a decent lineman in the second round.
cpayne5 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-07-2004, 05:34 PM   #3
Playmaker
 
itvnetop's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Age: 37
Posts: 2,854
udeze would be the better pick... you don't get 16.5 sacks (3 against a solid michigan line in the rose bowl) in your last season and call it a fluke.
itvnetop is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-07-2004, 05:52 PM   #4
Thank You, Sean.
 
Gmanc711's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Gaithersburg, MD
Age: 28
Posts: 7,499
I defintley dont think Taylor would be around. Wouldnt the whole point of the Texans trading up in the first place, is to get Taylor?
Gmanc711 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-07-2004, 06:24 PM   #5
The Starter
 
joecrisp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Charlottesville, VA
Age: 38
Posts: 1,501
Quote:
Originally Posted by raleighskinsfan
http://www.fanball.com/fb/article.cfm/ID.2409

In this mock, we trade down with Texas and pick up Will Smith, DE at #10.
Answer 3 questions for me-
1-In this scenario, would it be too much to hope that we would receive Texas' 2nd round pick also?
According to the trade value chart (http://www.nfldraftview.com/tvchart.html), the values would add up just about right if the Texans included the 8th pick in the 2nd round (#40 overall).

Quote:
Originally Posted by raleighskinsfan
2- If we got their second rounder, who might be available still that we would want? Any of the good TE's, LB's or D Linemen?
According to Mel Kiper's latest 2nd round projection (http://proxy.espn.go.com/ncf/columns...mel&id=1776794), there would be some starting-quality players available at positions of need for the Redskins with the #40 pick. These include LBs Karlos Dansby (Auburn), Daryl Smith (Georgia Tech), Courtney Watson (Notre Dame), Teddy Lehman (Oklahoma) and Michael Boulware (Florida State); DE Antwan Odom (Alabama) and DT Randy Starks (Maryland) might also be available.

Quote:
Originally Posted by raleighskinsfan
3- Would we be better off with Will Smith or Kenechi Udeze if we trade down to #10? Can someone who watches alot of college football sound off on that topic? From what I read, Udeze is the better of the 2...
I didn't watch a lot of college ball throughout the season, but based on what I did see in the bowl games (watching these two players in particular), and what I've read in various scouting reports, Udeze seems like a more well-rounded D-lineman, and a more consistent pass rush threat.

In this particular trade down scenario, I would select Udeze at #10, and pray that Starks is still available at #40 (possible, but I doubt it). Getting that duo could transform the D-line into a legitimate front-four against both the run and the pass.
joecrisp is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-07-2004, 06:51 PM   #6
Camp Scrub
 
JoeGibbsIsBack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 31
I'm thinking the Redskins trade down, get quality D-line, and just be happy with Ohalate.
JoeGibbsIsBack is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-07-2004, 07:03 PM   #7
Special Teams
 
Carnage's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 468
should be a good TE available at 40 too.
Carnage is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-07-2004, 07:38 PM   #8
Camp Scrub
 
mizzo skins man's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: St. Joseph Missouri
Age: 38
Posts: 83
TRADE DOWN!!! We need D-linemen. I'm with most of you take Udeze. He had 16.5 sacks last season, and alot of the time he had double and triple team blocking on his ass. He is a bad Mo Fo. If by chance, he is not available at #10 Will Smith would not be a bad choice either.
mizzo skins man is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-07-2004, 10:41 PM   #9
Pro Bowl
 
SKINSnCANES's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: New Jersey
Age: 32
Posts: 5,421
The real question is if we dont draft Taylor, does Iffy get to keep his number? lol, jk
__________________
"I'm used to winning, coming from the University of Miami. " Clinton Portis
SKINSnCANES is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-08-2004, 01:30 AM   #10
Playmaker
 
skinsfanthru&thru's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Richmond, VA
Age: 34
Posts: 3,719
if New England is willing to offer 2 first and one second for the pick BEHIND us, we should be able to get more than just a first and second. I realize the Texans picks are both higher up than new englands late round picks, but IMO 2 late first round picks and one late 2nd round pick r better than 1 1st and 1 2nd. just the 2 first round picks alone r better than the first and second.
skinsfanthru&thru is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-08-2004, 08:56 AM   #11
Camp Scrub
 
raleighskinsfan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 62
JoeCrisp- you are the man! Your resources are astounding! Exactly what I was looking for. You have now given me my dream scenario for this draft. Trade down to #10, pick up Udeze and then Starks in the second round! We would truly have a defensive line to contend with if we could add both of those guys! Also, I wasn't aware Udeze had 3 sacks in the Rose Bowl along with all those sacks overall- along with what I've read about him being a general all-around playmaker, causing fumbles and knocking down passes, the fact that he comes up large in big games is the final key. I hope we draft him! Having Udeze and Lavar on the field at the same time would be scary fun!
raleighskinsfan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-08-2004, 10:08 AM   #12
Playmaker
 
BleedBurgundy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 4,471
Quote:
Originally Posted by Carnage
should be a good TE available at 40 too.
Especially since Ben Troupe's (sp?) stock is falling.
BleedBurgundy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-08-2004, 01:46 PM   #13
Impact Rookie
 
Duffman003's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 590
I doubt starks would fall to the second round.
Duffman003 is online now   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:58 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site is not officially affiliated with the Washington Redskins or the NFL.
Page generated in 0.24317 seconds with 9 queries

Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0 RC5

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25