Warpath  

Home | Forums | Salary Cap Info | Shop | Donate | Stay Connected




Go Back   Warpath > Redskins Forums > Redskins Locker Room


Say it ain't so: RAMSEY may be on trading block

Redskins Locker Room


Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 04-13-2004, 09:17 PM   #16
Pro Bowl
 
SKINSnCANES's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: New Jersey
Age: 32
Posts: 5,421
if we could get the numer one pick without getting rid of five they should trade it no matter what to accumulate a bunch of picks in the middle of the round. The only problem is if they give up Samules, because you create a hole then.
__________________
"I'm used to winning, coming from the University of Miami. " Clinton Portis
SKINSnCANES is offline   Reply With Quote

Advertisements
Old 04-14-2004, 12:40 AM   #17
Franchise Player
 
Sheriff Gonna Getcha's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 35
Posts: 8,317
I obviously worship Ramsey, however I think that Rivers is going to be as good as Eli Manning. Rivers has Ramsey beat hands-down in terms of his accuracy and he isn't getting the attention he deserves because he has a funny, yet very effective, throwing style.

When you factor in the fact that trading Ramsey would bring us more picks, I say trade him if San Diego is willing to offer their #1 for Ramsey, Samuels, and Gardner.
Sheriff Gonna Getcha is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-14-2004, 01:23 AM   #18
Special Teams
 
Dave Butz Baby!'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Reston, VA
Age: 44
Posts: 450
Does it really surprise anyone to hear Ramsey's name come up again in trade rumors? The second you hear Chris Samuels' name (contract renegotiations/trade), Ramsey's is sure to follow since they have the same agent, Jimmy Sexton. I remember reading that when Brunell was signed, Sexton wanted a trade for Ramsey and was said to have "leverage" to get it done, since the Skins wanted to rework Samuels' contract.

Sexton/Samuels said no to reworking the deal, and now the Skins are very possibly considering trading away the "leverage" that Sexton had. If that does happen, Sexton's got nothing to bargain with and Ramsey's going nowhere.

It's interesting to watch different players with the same agents go through somewhat simlilar sets of circumstances, especially players on the same team.

Does anyone know if there is a comprehensive list online anywhere with players and their respective agents? Like with seemingly many of the Poston's representees (LaVar, Orlando Pace, Ty Law, Lawyer Milloy, etc etc etc) and their exploits, it's interesting to see who doesn't show up for camp or raises a stink over contracts and which agents they have.

Maybe owners should just start blackballing certain ones!
__________________
Never argue with an idiot. They drag you down to their level, then beat you with experience.
Dave Butz Baby! is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-14-2004, 01:50 AM   #19
Eternally Legendary
 
saden1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Seattle
Age: 35
Posts: 9,951
I have no faith in the Redskin managment.I no longer have any emotional reaction one way or another during the off season. I have that do as you bloody wish mentality.
saden1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-14-2004, 02:00 AM   #20
Pro Bowl
 
SKINSnCANES's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: New Jersey
Age: 32
Posts: 5,421
Ramsey, Samuels and Gardner for one pick... no way. The more I read all these scenerios where we keep giving away our the team sicker I get. Joe Gibbs wants a core group of Redskins and he isnt going to get it if he trades everyone that is a redskin.
__________________
"I'm used to winning, coming from the University of Miami. " Clinton Portis
SKINSnCANES is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-14-2004, 02:00 AM   #21
Pro Bowl
 
SKINSnCANES's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: New Jersey
Age: 32
Posts: 5,421
We have no continuity with out team, and thats something we desperatly need.
__________________
"I'm used to winning, coming from the University of Miami. " Clinton Portis
SKINSnCANES is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-14-2004, 03:22 AM   #22
Playmaker
 
BleedBurgundy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 4,471
Quote:
Originally Posted by offiss
Are you kidding me? Ramsey, Samuel's, and gardner for the #1 pick? why don't we throw in portis and smoot as well?

Only if we also send La Var, the #5 and Snyder's first born. (actually, that last one might not be a bad idea...)
BleedBurgundy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-14-2004, 07:12 AM   #23
Playmaker
 
BrudLee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Rehoboth Beach, DE
Posts: 3,494
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shane
If we trade to San Diego, as in one theory supposedly heard on a NY radio station yesterday, we may give up Samuels, Gardner, and Ramsey and a 5th round pick this year for Drew Brees, the #1 pick this year, and San Diego's #1 pick in 2005. We keep our #5 pick and get the #1 pick. We draft Gallery and possibly Winslow or Taylor.

That is a move I would make.
If this trade is on the board, then we should take it by all means. It would not only give us two first rounders the next two years, but it would absolutely validate the release of Schottenheimer from the team.
__________________
There's nowhere to go but up. Or down. I guess we could stay where we are, too.
BrudLee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-14-2004, 07:33 AM   #24
Puppy Kicker
 
Daseal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Arlington, Virginia
Age: 31
Posts: 8,221
That article says we get San Diego's first this year and next, but it contradicts itself by saying we give them the 5 at one point.

Now, I'm not sure if I'm much for this trade. Samuels and Gardner I can live without, but I really think Ramsey has a future. Who's going to be our QB of the future? Breese? I don't think so. I guess with San Diegos pick next year we could pick the cream of the crop as far as QBs go, but I don't know. There are a ton of great QBs coming out this year.

Either way, I don't believe anything till draft day 8)
Daseal is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-14-2004, 08:26 AM   #25
Camp Scrub
 
sonny-j-no9's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Virginia Beach, VA
Age: 46
Posts: 21
We have to remember, this is all speculation and rumors. Ramsey isnt going anywhere. I wouldnt be surprised to see Samuels go and I dont think it would be the worst thing in the world. Mainly because his career has been on the downslide the past couple of years (although that could have a lot to do with SS's faulty "blocking" schemes) and he'll have a HUGE impact in the team's salary cap the next couple of years. Gallery's contract would pale in comparison until the back end of the deal. All that said, I agree with most that say that defense is where we need the help -- dline and secondary. A pick up of Sean Taylor would suit me just fine...
sonny-j-no9 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-14-2004, 08:32 AM   #26
Playmaker
 
Sammy Baugh Fan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Northern Virginia, Woodbridge
Age: 52
Posts: 2,507
Well I quit using the Lavar Wallpaper the other day and put Ramsey in his place......will someone make a GIBBS wallpaper? PLEASE!!!!!


lol
peace
__________________
Check out Mike Hedrick - The Next Food Network Star.
Please Click and give me a Thumbs Up and Positive Comment. Thanks
Sammy Baugh Fan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-14-2004, 09:19 AM   #27
Playmaker
 
BleedBurgundy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 4,471
Quote:
Originally Posted by SKINSnCANES
We have no continuity with out team, and thats something we desperatly need.
Preach on, brother....
BleedBurgundy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-14-2004, 09:37 AM   #28
Special Teams
 
dieselhog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Bolton, Lancashire
Age: 42
Posts: 166
I really hope that ramsey does stay here because Brunnell WILL NOT STAY HEALTHY FOR 16 GAMES!!!!
dieselhog is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-14-2004, 10:29 AM   #29
Impact Rookie
 
SkinsRock's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Crofton, MD
Age: 44
Posts: 907
Brunell will play well, but get injured. Ramsey will play better and will be the starter by the end of the season, and will lead us into the play offs.
He will not be traded.
SkinsRock is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-14-2004, 10:53 AM   #30
Camp Scrub
 
Showtime's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 8
I think Ramsey, by himself, is still worth more than the #1 pick in the draft. He's better than Manning and Rothleisberger for our offense b/c he's more able to play NOW and he's got a rocket arm and is intelligent. Gibbs doesn't want to spend time having a #2 QB who is a rookie.

By the way, I think we should try and trade up for a higher pick, if we can keep teh #5 pick, but pick FITZGERALD instead of Gallery.
Showtime is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:49 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site is not officially affiliated with the Washington Redskins or the NFL.
Page generated in 0.38772 seconds with 9 queries

Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0 RC5

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25