Holdman or Barrow?

skinsfanthru&thru · 04-16-2004, 02:16 AM

Who would be a better signing for the team the next 2 seasons or so? I'm not sure if Holdman has expirience or the talent to play the middle lb slot, but I do know Barrow did one heck of a job last year with an under performing d-line in front of him.

backrow · 04-16-2004, 07:42 AM

I'm torn! I think our guy Clemons can do it without investing any more on the LB's!

RTerps2002 · 04-16-2004, 02:40 PM

I would perfer Holdman because he has more speed

SKINSnCANES · 04-16-2004, 02:41 PM

Barrow wouldnt come cheap. thats why they didnt make him an offer, he wanted to much money. Holdman is a younger player that has done well. He could be more than a two year solution for us. He doesnt usuallyplay middle but Williams would take that into accoutn with his schemes

skinsfanthru&thru · 04-17-2004, 01:57 PM

since holdman is gone, I think I'd rather go with the scenario of signing barrow, dump mitchell, and use clifton smith as barrows backup. barrow is an upgrade over mitchell and would be a better teacher to help out smith possibly become our starter next year.

SKINSnCANES · 04-17-2004, 02:43 PM

I dont think Barrow would sign a deal to play in that scenerio. He probably wants his last big deal. Get mabye a four year deal and get be a starter. I cant see him being effective for more than two seasons though. If the Skins coudl get a two year deal for him that be great. Not at teh expense of getting dlinemen though.

04-16-2004, 02:16 AM	#1
skinsfanthru&thru Playmaker Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: Richmond, VA Age: 32 Posts: 3,504	Holdman or Barrow? Who would be a better signing for the team the next 2 seasons or so? I'm not sure if Holdman has expirience or the talent to play the middle lb slot, but I do know Barrow did one heck of a job last year with an under performing d-line in front of him.

04-16-2004, 07:42 AM	#2
backrow The Starter Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: 36.28 x 76.22 Age: 61 Posts: 1,791	I'm torn! I'm torn! I think our guy Clemons can do it without investing any more on the LB's! __________________ '37, '42, '83, '88, '92. Championship!

04-16-2004, 02:41 PM	#4
SKINSnCANES Pro Bowl Join Date: Mar 2004 Location: New Jersey Age: 31 Posts: 5,394	Barrow wouldnt come cheap. thats why they didnt make him an offer, he wanted to much money. Holdman is a younger player that has done well. He could be more than a two year solution for us. He doesnt usuallyplay middle but Williams would take that into accoutn with his schemes __________________ "I'm used to winning, coming from the University of Miami. " Clinton Portis

04-17-2004, 02:43 PM	#6
SKINSnCANES Pro Bowl Join Date: Mar 2004 Location: New Jersey Age: 31 Posts: 5,394	I dont think Barrow would sign a deal to play in that scenerio. He probably wants his last big deal. Get mabye a four year deal and get be a starter. I cant see him being effective for more than two seasons though. If the Skins coudl get a two year deal for him that be great. Not at teh expense of getting dlinemen though. __________________ "I'm used to winning, coming from the University of Miami. " Clinton Portis

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

04-16-2004, 02:40 PM	#3
RTerps2002 Camp Scrub Join Date: Mar 2004 Location: FT Lauderdale Florida Age: 41 Posts: 33	I would perfer Holdman because he has more speed

04-17-2004, 01:57 PM	#5
skinsfanthru&thru Playmaker Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: Richmond, VA Age: 32 Posts: 3,504	since holdman is gone, I think I'd rather go with the scenario of signing barrow, dump mitchell, and use clifton smith as barrows backup. barrow is an upgrade over mitchell and would be a better teacher to help out smith possibly become our starter next year.

Holdman or Barrow?

Redskins Locker Room