Warpath  

Home | Forums | Salary Cap Info | Shop | Donate | Stay Connected




Go Back   Warpath > Redskins Forums > Redskins Locker Room


dave fiore

Redskins Locker Room


Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 04-21-2004, 05:40 PM   #16
New HC, new hope!
 
RedskinRat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: I'm in LA, trick!
Posts: 8,702
That would be huge.
RedskinRat is offline   Reply With Quote

Advertisements
Old 04-21-2004, 05:44 PM   #17
Special Teams
 
Phinehas's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 106
Would Samuels want to play at Guard, or would he likely be dissatisfied and look to get traded? (i.e. not sign an extension next year, forcing us to move him for cap reasons)

--Phin
Phinehas is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-21-2004, 06:29 PM   #18
‎\m/
 
Mattyk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 42
Posts: 82,988
Quote:
Originally Posted by smootsmack
Did anyone see this quote in Maske's column in today's Wash Post?

"The agent (a veteran NFL agent who has one of the top players in this draft as a client) said the Redskins want to keep left tackle Chris Samuels even if they obtain Gallery, and likely would move Samuels to guard in that scenario. "That would be them jumbo-ing up their line to be like the old 'Hogs,' '' the agent said.

What do we think of that?
Funny because that thought actually crossed my mind when the Gallery rumors were flying. That would make for a hell of a line that's for sure!
Mattyk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-21-2004, 06:40 PM   #19
Playmaker
 
Defensewins's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 2,932
Thats funny because I thought Samuels was part of the package to move up from the #5 spot. You can't say WR Rod Gardner and LB Trotter would be enough. What then? Next years draft pick or picks?
Defensewins is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-21-2004, 07:57 PM   #20
Playmaker
 
skinsfanthru&thru's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Richmond, VA
Age: 34
Posts: 3,737
Quote:
Originally Posted by Defensewins
Thats funny because I thought Samuels was part of the package to move up from the #5 spot. You can't say WR Rod Gardner and LB Trotter would be enough. What then? Next years draft pick or picks?
i think it'd be ramsey. he's pretty much the only player other than samuels with high trade value.
skinsfanthru&thru is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-21-2004, 08:02 PM   #21
Playmaker
 
sportscurmudgeon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 3,159
smootsmack:

I suggested the move of Samuels inside back in January. Mark May started as a tackle but really was better as a guard.

Don't get too sappy here about Dockery. He may become a serviceable interior lineman, but at Matty said, this guy is SLOW. He could get rear-ended by a glacier and you can teach a lot of technique things but you can't teach "fast" or "quick".
sportscurmudgeon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-21-2004, 10:19 PM   #22
Special Teams
 
jasonskin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: washington dc
Age: 32
Posts: 148
we would have a one of the beat lines but it's not got to happen.we are going to draft the man sean taylor
jasonskin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-21-2004, 11:09 PM   #23
‎\m/
 
Mattyk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 42
Posts: 82,988
Quote:
Originally Posted by sportscurmudgeon
smootsmack:

I suggested the move of Samuels inside back in January. Mark May started as a tackle but really was better as a guard.

Don't get too sappy here about Dockery. He may become a serviceable interior lineman, but at Matty said, this guy is SLOW. He could get rear-ended by a glacier and you can teach a lot of technique things but you can't teach "fast" or "quick".
While you can't teach fast or quick, he could benefit from dropping some weight, toning up and going through the rigors of a Gibbs led training camp!
Mattyk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-21-2004, 11:14 PM   #24
Pro Bowl
 
SKINSnCANES's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: New Jersey
Age: 32
Posts: 5,421
I wouldnt want to do that. We have Bugel, if we only have one spot on our line that isnt solid and bugel should be able to take care of that. Plus all of our schemes will be better. I would be upset if we got Gallery. Everyone arugues about Winslow or Taylor but no one would be mad if we picked either one of htem. Our team is an impact player away from stepping up to the next level and Gallery would give our team anything. Portis would be better but he'll do well anyways.
__________________
"I'm used to winning, coming from the University of Miami. " Clinton Portis
SKINSnCANES is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:58 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site is not officially affiliated with the Washington Redskins or the NFL.
Page generated in 0.20455 seconds with 9 queries

Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0 RC5

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25