Warpath  

Home | Forums | Salary Cap Info | Shop | Donate | Stay Connected




Go Back   Warpath > Redskins Forums > Redskins Locker Room


Pro Bowl Bound - Samuels, Moss

Redskins Locker Room


Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 12-21-2005, 05:42 PM   #1
MVP
 
mooby's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: NoVa
Age: 26
Posts: 11,888
Pro Bowl Bound - Samuels, Moss

http://www.redskins.com/news/newsDetail.jsp?id=13826

how the **** does chris cooley make first alternate? all i've been hearing is how cooley led in voting for nfc fullbacks. I'm happy that Moss is going, but i think it's stupid that Marcus Washington isn't, he's having a better season than last year too. I really do not think Samuels deserves to go. He has been dominated by some of the best defensive ends we have faced. Cough Jared Allen Cough.

And what really pisses me off is Michael Vick. He has been horrible this season, yet he makes it to the Pro Bowl? that is complete bullshit, it just shows that some fans don't care about who's actually doing well during the season, if you're a big name having a mediocre season you still have an excellent shot.
mooby is offline   Reply With Quote

Advertisements
Old 12-21-2005, 05:46 PM   #2
Special Teams
 
bertoskins's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: philippines
Age: 40
Posts: 184
Re: Pro Bowl Bound - Samuels, Moss

voting sucks, they should include

1. cooley
2. griffin
3. taylor

roy williams was selected ahead of taylor
this is shit
bertoskins is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-21-2005, 05:47 PM   #3
MVP
 
mooby's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: NoVa
Age: 26
Posts: 11,888
Re: Pro Bowl Bound - Samuels, Moss

griffin wouldn't make it based on the fact that he's been injured part of the season. i do think marcus washington and sean taylor should've been on there.
mooby is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-21-2005, 06:14 PM   #4
The Starter
 
steveo395's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 1,674
Re: Pro Bowl Bound - Samuels, Moss

cooley won the voting, but that only counts as 1/3 of the voting...he didnt win because the coaches and players vote and u know they would want a real fullback in there
steveo395 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-21-2005, 06:21 PM   #5
Special Teams
 
AnonEmouse's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: UK
Age: 48
Posts: 469
Re: Pro Bowl Bound - Samuels, Moss

Quote:
Originally Posted by steveo395
cooley won the voting, but that only counts as 1/3 of the voting...he didnt win because the coaches and players vote and u know they would want a real fullback in there
The stupid thing is, he'd considered a TE for stats and he leads the NFC in receptions! :frusty:
AnonEmouse is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-21-2005, 06:47 PM   #6
MVP
 
dmek25's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: lancaster,pa
Age: 52
Posts: 10,517
Re: Pro Bowl Bound - Samuels, Moss

williams wins the popularity contest big deal we have sean taylor on our side and thats all that matters
dmek25 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-21-2005, 07:05 PM   #7
Special Teams
 
Skins_4_Lyfe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Upper Marlboro, MD/Greensboro, NC
Age: 26
Posts: 482
Re: Pro Bowl Bound - Samuels, Moss

I think that Mark Brunell has fewer INT's than all of the QB's selected to the Pro Bowl, NFC & AFC. He is the reason that Moss is making his first trip. It is clear that the Pro Bowl is a popularity contest when Michael Vick goes after that terrible season.

Cooley probably didn't make it because no one is sure what position he plays because of Joe Gibbs "old school" offense.

I think that Mike Sellers should have at least been a first alternate. He does our dirty work and is no stranger to the endzone. He is the type of player that you appreciate and his roll in an offense is often overlooked.

Our defense doesn't have anyone making the trip because of all the packages that Gregg Williams uses. players don't get as many reps as others in the league.

The Pro Bowl is overrated and we will see how this season turns out with our "under achieving" players.
Skins_4_Lyfe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-21-2005, 07:10 PM   #8
Pro Bowl
 
BigSKINBauer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Washington, DC
Age: 26
Posts: 5,636
Re: Pro Bowl Bound - Samuels, Moss

Quote:
Originally Posted by Skins_4_Lyfe
I think that Mark Brunell has fewer INT's than all of the QB's selected to the Pro Bowl, NFC & AFC. He is the reason that Moss is making his first trip. It is clear that the Pro Bowl is a popularity contest when Michael Vick goes after that terrible season.

Cooley probably didn't make it because no one is sure what position he plays because of Joe Gibbs "old school" offense.

I think that Mike Sellers should have at least been a first alternate. He does our dirty work and is no stranger to the endzone. He is the type of player that you appreciate and his roll in an offense is often overlooked.

Our defense doesn't have anyone making the trip because of all the packages that Gregg Williams uses. players don't get as many reps as others in the league.

The Pro Bowl is overrated and we will see how this season turns out with our "under achieving" players.
:headbange :cheeky-sm :headbange :headbange :headbange
__________________
"For there is nothing half so glorious
As to see our team victorious"



BSB
BigSKINBauer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-21-2005, 07:48 PM   #9
MVP
 
mooby's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: NoVa
Age: 26
Posts: 11,888
Re: Pro Bowl Bound - Samuels, Moss

i think kyle vanden bosch should've gone. he's having a monster season too. I hope we can sign him after his contract is up this year.
mooby is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-21-2005, 08:35 PM   #10
Impact Rookie
 
ST21's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Texas
Posts: 519
Re: Pro Bowl Bound - Samuels, Moss

I heard Parcells voted everyday for Roy Williams...
__________________
SAY HELLO TO THE BAD GUY........
ST21 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-21-2005, 09:42 PM   #11
MVP
 
dmek25's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: lancaster,pa
Age: 52
Posts: 10,517
Re: Pro Bowl Bound - Samuels, Moss

wewhite what team do you root for?just wondering
dmek25 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-21-2005, 10:27 PM   #12
JUST LIVIN
 
htownskinfan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: houston,tx
Age: 52
Posts: 3,429
Re: Pro Bowl Bound - Samuels, Moss

Quote:
Originally Posted by dmek25
wewhite what team do you root for?just wondering
yeah,that falcons helmet is throwing me off
htownskinfan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-21-2005, 11:37 PM   #13
Uncle Phil
 
SmootSmack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 44,674
Re: Pro Bowl Bound - Samuels, Moss

The argument for Vick is that the team is nothing without him and how he does so much with so little to work with. So if that's the reason why he was chosen over someone (Brunell) who statistically is having a much better reason and, unlike Vick, has his team in the playoffs right now then why do Dunn (over Portis) and Crumpler (over Cooley) get Pro Bowl nods as well? I thought Vick was some miracle worker working with scrubs.

And then how does Keith Brooking get the nod over Marcus Washington?! Stupid Falcons.

All I know is both the Redskins and the Falcons had huge games this past Sunday with major playoff implications. One team's "Pro Bowlers" responded with a resounding victory. The other team's folded into the fetal position
__________________
You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You
SmootSmack is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-21-2005, 11:42 PM   #14
I like big (_|_)s.
 
TheMalcolmConnection's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Lexington, Virginia
Age: 32
Posts: 17,524
Re: Pro Bowl Bound - Samuels, Moss

Well put TAFKAS.
__________________
Regret nothing. At one time it was exactly what you wanted.
TheMalcolmConnection is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-22-2005, 04:16 AM   #15
Impact Rookie
 
ST21's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Texas
Posts: 519
Re: Pro Bowl Bound - Samuels, Moss

Quote:
Originally Posted by htownskinfan
yeah,that falcons helmet is throwing me off
Don't let it, I'm skin fan until I die, but this is my protest for M.Vick without, making anyone wet in there panties...
__________________
SAY HELLO TO THE BAD GUY........
ST21 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:41 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site is not officially affiliated with the Washington Redskins or the NFL.
Page generated in 0.30113 seconds with 9 queries

Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0 RC5

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25