![]() |
| |||||||
![]() |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
| | #1 |
| Gamebreaker Join Date: Mar 2008 Location: Waldorf, MD Age: 29
Posts: 12,512
| Why do so many teams end up with wide open receivers, but we don't? Some guys make it look like college, literally wide open by 10 yards waiting for the pass, nothing else to do. It seems that we rarely if EVER see this. Why?
__________________ http://www.twitter.com/RedskinsRT |
| | |
| Advertisements |
| | #2 |
| You did WHAT?!? Join Date: Feb 2007 Location: In The Kitchen With Dyna. Age: 24
Posts: 11,005
| Re: Why do so many teams end up with wide open receivers, but we don't? Government conspiracy??? But seriously you'll be suprised what Pure Speed (DeSean Jackson, Randy Moss, Steve Smith) and superior route running (Wes Welker, Larry Fitzgerald) will do for you. Mot to mention broken coverage in some cases. Outside of Moss we don't have that speedster who can get behind the defense consistently or that route running master that moves the chains.
__________________ http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bpp3ycMvQd0 This is why you need Mentos. To justify your questionable problem solving skills. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z7geP5ev0VI Awesome isn't it. |
| | |
| | #3 |
| You did WHAT?!? Join Date: Feb 2007 Location: In The Kitchen With Dyna. Age: 24
Posts: 11,005
| Re: Why do so many teams end up with wide open receivers, but we don't? Also, isnt this in the wrong area??
__________________ http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bpp3ycMvQd0 This is why you need Mentos. To justify your questionable problem solving skills. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z7geP5ev0VI Awesome isn't it. |
| | |
| | #4 |
| The Starter Join Date: Jul 2004 Location: San Diego Ca
Posts: 2,178
| Re: Why do so many teams end up with wide open receivers, but we don't? No, according to the OP our WRs are meeting up with DBs everyweekend.
__________________ You don't get what you deserve, you get what you negotiate. |
| | |
| | #5 |
| Naega jeil jal naga ![]() Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: Atlanta, Georgia From: Silver Spring, Maryland Age: 27
Posts: 13,952
| Re: Why do so many teams end up with wide open receivers, but we don't? Stan Hixon.
__________________ Flacco is 1337 Fanclub President |
| | |
| | #6 |
| Swearinger ![]() ![]() Join Date: Sep 2006 Location: Washington, DC Age: 34
Posts: 12,623
| Re: Why do so many teams end up with wide open receivers, but we don't? I get the feeling you can merge this with the drunk thread....
__________________ Insert witty signature here |
| | |
| | #7 |
| Gamebreaker Join Date: Mar 2008 Location: Waldorf, MD Age: 29
Posts: 12,512
| Re: Why do so many teams end up with wide open receivers, but we don't? GM is on key it's a valid question but prob could've landed in another thread and POSSIBLY in the right section...
__________________ http://www.twitter.com/RedskinsRT |
| | |
| | #8 |
| You did WHAT?!? Join Date: Feb 2007 Location: In The Kitchen With Dyna. Age: 24
Posts: 11,005
| Re: Why do so many teams end up with wide open receivers, but we don't?
__________________ http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bpp3ycMvQd0 This is why you need Mentos. To justify your questionable problem solving skills. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z7geP5ev0VI Awesome isn't it. |
| | |
| | #9 |
| Gamebreaker Join Date: Mar 2008 Location: Waldorf, MD Age: 29
Posts: 12,512
| Re: Why do so many teams end up with wide open receivers, but we don't? relying on SmootSmack atm
__________________ http://www.twitter.com/RedskinsRT |
| | |
| | #10 |
| You did WHAT?!? Join Date: Feb 2007 Location: In The Kitchen With Dyna. Age: 24
Posts: 11,005
| Re: Why do so many teams end up with wide open receivers, but we don't? SmootSmack has his own personal ATM? Man I need perks like that.
__________________ http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bpp3ycMvQd0 This is why you need Mentos. To justify your questionable problem solving skills. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z7geP5ev0VI Awesome isn't it. |
| | |
| | #11 |
| Mad Men ![]() Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 43,095
| Re: Why do so many teams end up with wide open receivers, but we don't? Because Campbell still sucks. He sucks so bad our receivers still can't get open even with him gone
__________________ You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You |
| | |
| | #12 | |
| Playmaker Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 3,328
| Re: Why do so many teams end up with wide open receivers, but we don't? Quote:
| |
| | |
| | #13 |
| MVP ![]() Join Date: Aug 2008 Location: Pasadena, Md Age: 45
Posts: 10,901
| Re: Why do so many teams end up with wide open receivers, but we don't? I believe it's a known fact that Stan Hixon has so totally brainwashed every Skins receiver for the last decade (yes even before and after he was our coach) into believing that the goal of a receiver is to cover the CB. Thus our WR's think they are excelling by the lack of separation they get. Further he often (as I understand it) would have Carlos come to the WR meetings to teach the proper techniques for catching a ball with your hands. |
| | |
| | #14 |
| \m/ ![]() Join Date: Feb 2004 Age: 40
Posts: 72,652
| Re: Why do so many teams end up with wide open receivers, but we don't? Moss and Cooley were "wide open" several times on Sunday night. Receivers in this league aren't open by 10 yards on any sort of regular basis in this league. |
| | |
| | #15 |
| Franchise Player Join Date: Oct 2006 Location: Arlington, VA.
Posts: 8,103
| Re: Why do so many teams end up with wide open receivers, but we don't? Who knows. Blame it on Snyder. lol. |
| | |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |