Current Redskins Salary Cap Status - 2009

Schneed10 · 02-27-2009, 09:08 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SouperMeister

Suppose that the labor situation gets resolved and there is a cap in 2010? Does the structure of this deal cast us directly to "Cap Hell", assuming we want to retain Haynesworth???

Not necessarily, because at that point the 30% Rule would be gone, meaning there would be no restrictions on base salary inflation rates. Danny would just renegotiate that option bonus into a signing bonus, prorating it over the life of the contract.

Some might cry, "the economy, the economy!" Some think the economy will have a negative impact on the growth of the salary cap limit. But we saw this year that the cap came in at $127 million, $4 million more than the projected $123. While merchandise sales are suffering, TV demand and ticket demand remains high, fueling revenue growth. Recession, depression, whatever. The NFL business model remains strong. Just look how rabid we all are for the latest NFL info.

As long as the cap continues to go up, Danny would continue to restructure contracts in a capped environment. Cash over cap, that's the bottom line. As long as Danny has the money, he'll find a way.

JoeRedskin · 02-27-2009, 10:07 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CRedskinsRule

Since we Franchised SmootSmack, is Schneed a UFA, or is he locked up as well??

The biggest concern with Schneed is he's not really a "locker room" guy. In addition, he's pretty much just a younger, less canadian version of CC. While losing him would have an effect, it might be addition by subtraction. So long as Canuck is around (I think we have him under contract until 2050) we should be fine. Besides, we have plenty of talent to step into any void created - GTripp, GMscud, That Guy, Zach Mills.

AND, even if he leaves, he'll be back a' la Smoot and Dockery.

Ruhskins · 02-27-2009, 10:59 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JoeRedskin

The biggest concern with Schneed is he's not really a "locker room" guy. In addition, he's pretty much just a younger, less canadian version of CC. While losing him would have an effect, it might be addition by subtraction. So long as Canuck is around (I think we have him under contract until 2050) we should be fine. Besides, we have plenty of talent to step into any void created - GTripp, GMscud, That Guy, Zach Mills.

AND, even if he leaves, he'll be back a' la Smoot and Dockery.

Schneed10 · 02-27-2009, 11:30 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JoeRedskin

The biggest concern with Schneed is he's not really a "locker room" guy. In addition, he's pretty much just a younger, less canadian version of CC. While losing him would have an effect, it might be addition by subtraction. So long as Canuck is around (I think we have him under contract until 2050) we should be fine. Besides, we have plenty of talent to step into any void created - GTripp, GMscud, That Guy, Zach Mills.

AND, even if he leaves, he'll be back a' la Smoot and Dockery.

LOL!

Mattyk · 02-27-2009, 11:34 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JoeRedskin

The biggest concern with Schneed is he's not really a "locker room" guy. In addition, he's pretty much just a younger, less canadian version of CC. While losing him would have an effect, it might be addition by subtraction. So long as Canuck is around (I think we have him under contract until 2050) we should be fine. Besides, we have plenty of talent to step into any void created - GTripp, GMscud, That Guy, Zach Mills.

AND, even if he leaves, he'll be back a' la Smoot and Dockery.

Yeah there are some chemistry issues at times but the dude is a baller overall.

Schneed10 · 02-27-2009, 11:37 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mattyk72

Yeah there are some chemistry issues at times but the dude is a baller overall.

I am the asshole in here, aren't I.

When I put my mind to it I can curtail that. I'll do better, nobody likes the asshole. So That Guy, sorry for coming at you in this thread. It's never good to squash discussion and I kinda did that.

GMScud · 02-27-2009, 11:40 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JoeRedskin

The biggest concern with Schneed is he's not really a "locker room" guy. In addition, he's pretty much just a younger, less canadian version of CC. While losing him would have an effect, it might be addition by subtraction. So long as Canuck is around (I think we have him under contract until 2050) we should be fine. Besides, we have plenty of talent to step into any void created - GTripp, GMscud, That Guy, Zach Mills.

AND, even if he leaves, he'll be back a' la Smoot and Dockery.

Can't really argue with his on the field credentials. He's no TO, he just exudes confidence like any other baller. He's pushing 30 though. He may have to restructure if he wants to stick around. I know I had to last August.

SmootSmack · 02-27-2009, 11:43 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Schneed10

I am the asshole in here, aren't I.

When I put my mind to it I can curtail that. I'll do better, nobody likes the asshole. So That Guy, sorry for coming at you in this thread. It's never good to squash discussion and I kinda did that.

Will we be seeing you doing sit-ups in your driveway anytime soon?

When asked to comment on Matty's three-typo post during the Redskins vs. Rams Game Thread, Schneed wiped away the tears behind his Oakley shades and replied "that's my teammate...that's my site administrator"

Hog1 · 02-27-2009, 11:47 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SmootSmack

Will we be seeing you doing sit-ups in your driveway anytime soon?

When asked to comment on Matty's three-typo post during the Redskins vs. Rams Game Thread, Schneed wiped away the tears behind his Oakley shades and replied "that's my teammate...that's my site administrator"

By any chance does Schneed own a ........a white Bronco?

JoeRedskin · 02-27-2009, 12:02 PM

Now look, I think my original post is being misunderstood. Just b/c Schneed speaks his mind and isn't concerned with chemistry is not a reason to ditch him.

Rather, even though he's redundant and a jerk at times, we don't want a team of pantywaists and group huggers. So far he hasn't started his own "SchneedSite" and, while Schneed may love sum Schneed, he doesn't throw it in everyone's face (well, not too often). When it comes to crunching numbers, he's a real team player.

Smoot has always wanted this site to be about him and has some real leadership issues. So of course, he's gonna bring up the "he's my site-administrator" issue. SS is still upset about losing the Best Admin contest years ago and is just busy piling on the hate. EVEN AFTER SCHNEED GAVE HIM PROPS!!! It's wrong man, it's just wrong.

My ONLY point was that Schneed's a solid site guy but there is no need to go out on a limb to retain him with a franchise/transition tag.

Stop the hate, Smoot. Stop the hate.

SmootSmack · 02-27-2009, 12:09 PM

I'll admit I was much humbler as TAFKAS, but the name SmootSmack demands arrogance!

CrazyCanuck · 02-27-2009, 12:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JoeRedskin

So long as Canuck is around (I think we have him under contract until 2050) we should be fine.

My agent sucks, I want to restructure...

CrazyCanuck · 02-27-2009, 12:39 PM

PS - I'm running around a bit but I'll get new cap sheets done this weekend.

The Goat · 02-27-2009, 08:22 PM

Jeez, I've been waiting all day to see 1) what's left over from the insanity of the last 24 hrs 2) reasonable scenarios of who we can sign to the o-line.

... c'mon people, i'm relying on you here

Schneed10 · 02-27-2009, 08:53 PM

First post in the thread is updated. Note that numbers are very preliminary at this point, but should be in the ballpark. CC will nail down the numbers like he always does.

I have us at $7.0 million in cap space currently. This is based on Canuck's February 12th sheets, and reflecting the following moves which have taken place since:

- The addition of Haynesworth and Hall.
- The tenders of Golston, Monty, and Suisham.
- The release of Washington and Springs.
- The voiding of Phillip Daniels' contract.
- The restructures/extensions of Carter, Randle-El, Samuels, and Griffin.
- The re-signing of Ethan Albright.

I anticipate Dockery can be had for $3.5 in space (assuming 15 million guaranteed). I anticipate we can grab another lineman for $2.5 or so. That should still leave us enough room for our rookies, and either Daniels or Evans, assuming the price on them comes down over the few weeks (which I think it will, they can't be valued very highly outside of Redskins Park).

02-27-2009, 12:02 PM	#280
JoeRedskin Contains football related knowledge Join Date: Mar 2004 Location: Second Star On The Right Age: 50 Posts: 7,166	Re: Current Redskins Salary Cap Status - 2009 Now look, I think my original post is being misunderstood. Just b/c Schneed speaks his mind and isn't concerned with chemistry is not a reason to ditch him. Rather, even though he's redundant and a jerk at times, we don't want a team of pantywaists and group huggers. So far he hasn't started his own "SchneedSite" and, while Schneed may love sum Schneed, he doesn't throw it in everyone's face (well, not too often). When it comes to crunching numbers, he's a real team player. Smoot has always wanted this site to be about him and has some real leadership issues. So of course, he's gonna bring up the "he's my site-administrator" issue. SS is still upset about losing the Best Admin contest years ago and is just busy piling on the hate. EVEN AFTER SCHNEED GAVE HIM PROPS!!! It's wrong man, it's just wrong. My ONLY point was that Schneed's a solid site guy but there is no need to go out on a limb to retain him with a franchise/transition tag. Stop the hate, Smoot. Stop the hate. __________________ My Little Pony: Friendship is magic? or ... a repressive matriarchal society where individuals' roles are defined by their immutable physical characteristics and governance is reserved for those who demonstrate the genetic purity of the pony master race?

02-27-2009, 12:09 PM	#281
SmootSmack The Bluths Join Date: Feb 2004 Posts: 43,105	Re: Current Redskins Salary Cap Status - 2009 I'll admit I was much humbler as TAFKAS, but the name SmootSmack demands arrogance! __________________ You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You

02-27-2009, 12:39 PM	#283
CrazyCanuck NFC East Champs Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: Canada Posts: 1,792	Re: Current Redskins Salary Cap Status - 2009 PS - I'm running around a bit but I'll get new cap sheets done this weekend.

02-27-2009, 08:22 PM	#284
The Goat Pro Bowl Join Date: Jan 2008 Posts: 5,021	Re: Current Redskins Salary Cap Status - 2009 Jeez, I've been waiting all day to see 1) what's left over from the insanity of the last 24 hrs 2) reasonable scenarios of who we can sign to the o-line. ... c'mon people, i'm relying on you here __________________ Sometimes you eat the bear, and sometimes he eats you.

02-27-2009, 08:53 PM	#285
Schneed10 RG Glee Join Date: Feb 2005 Location: Newtown Square, PA Age: 33 Posts: 7,897	Re: Current Redskins Salary Cap Status - 2009 First post in the thread is updated. Note that numbers are very preliminary at this point, but should be in the ballpark. CC will nail down the numbers like he always does. I have us at $7.0 million in cap space currently. This is based on Canuck's February 12th sheets, and reflecting the following moves which have taken place since: - The addition of Haynesworth and Hall. - The tenders of Golston, Monty, and Suisham. - The release of Washington and Springs. - The voiding of Phillip Daniels' contract. - The restructures/extensions of Carter, Randle-El, Samuels, and Griffin. - The re-signing of Ethan Albright. I anticipate Dockery can be had for $3.5 in space (assuming 15 million guaranteed). I anticipate we can grab another lineman for $2.5 or so. That should still leave us enough room for our rookies, and either Daniels or Evans, assuming the price on them comes down over the few weeks (which I think it will, they can't be valued very highly outside of Redskins Park). __________________ Skins' Salary Cap Status \| CrazyCanuck's Cap Figures by Player \| Salary Cap 101

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

Current Redskins Salary Cap Status - 2009

Salary Cap Central