Quote:
Originally Posted by Chico23231
You dont need stats to see the offense was simply much better when Garcon was on the field. If you didnt see it, you werent watching.
|
You know, I absolutely agree with you. Considering the initial spark and excitement he helped create in the first game with that long TD -- splitting and outrunning the Saints defense, the game tying touchdown in the Baltimore game, the incredible grab and run in the memorable Thanksgiving game -- again splitting and outrunning the defense, his performance in the seven game win streak during which he put up big yardage with clutch catches and out produced every other receiver on the team, I thought the assertions that:
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Goat
Garcon made little to no impact in several games (outside the ones he missed completely), getting yardage in junk minutes but otherwise being very quiet[;]
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Goat
… the offensive production wasn't hugely different over the course of the season, with or without Garcon[;]
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Goat
… as the season wore on Garcon was quiet for long stretches[;]
|
and
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Goat
Garcon is eating up an enormous amount of cap space and has yet to prove he's worth it
|
… were self-evidently stupid.
However, since I “know absolutely nothing about the game football”, because I am a “moron” for thinking Garcon is a potentially elite receiver, and it would be sheer “idiocy” to believe that Garcon was well worth his cap impact, I just wanted to see how the stats stacked up in light of my moronic and idiotic assertion that Garcon’s in-game impact has comfortably exceeded his cap impact.
After doing so, I feel comforted that my complete lack of football knowledge didn’t stop me from appreciating what a difference maker Garcon is in this offense. Sorry if my pedantic investigation of facts and figures may have bored those who are not as football impaired as me.