Quote:
Originally Posted by JoeRedskin
And I'll beat the crap out of you and then sue your ass into the poor house for starting the fight.
And I'll win again.
|
lol this is funny to me.
under your logic and seeming support of zimmerman's defense - garyclark could just shoot you dead during the fight then point to the state v. zimmerman case as precedent that you can kill someone because they were winning the fist fight.
basically if zimmerman gets off - it totally changes the agreed upon rules of combat i thought all guys understood.
this is a bad case for pro-gun advocates imo.
edit - im not a criminal defense or FL atty but .. im guessing "self defense"is an affirmative defense and zimmerman has the burden of proving he was 1) not they aggressor, 2) he was in reasonable fear of his own life (not safety but life) and 3) there were no other non-lethal alternatives available.
i think he needs to take the stand to satisfy his burden. Mr. Good's testimony shows it was a fist fight, nothing more.