Quote:
Originally Posted by saden1
|
LMAO. These two posts are too good not to respond to. For the post above, I was going to respond with, "Do you understand in what way 5th amendment rights apply in this case, saden?" But why try to provide some reasoning to your thinking myself? Saden, how does this case you cite applies to the Zimmerman case?
Quote:
Originally Posted by saden1
|
OMG. I saw this website earlier and figured it was so in favor of Zimmerman it would be dismissed as too biased. Saden, like the prosecution in this case, you keep giving victory to your opponent. In this example, you don't understand that not all affirmative defenses are alike.
From the website you brought up yourself:
Florida Law on Self-Defense : Use of Deadly and Non Deadly Force
What Evidence is Required to Raise a Self-Defense Claim in Florida?
The defendant is entitled to a jury instruction on self-defense in Florida when there is any evidence to support the claim. This is a low standard and even a “scintilla” of evidence will be sufficient, even if the self-defense theory is extremely weak or improbable. Self-defense may even be inferred from the State’s evidence without the Defendant or a defense witness ever taking the stand.
Read further, I think the website you brought up pretty much addresses and then invalidates every argument you've made in this thread, saden.
