Quote:
Originally Posted by Mattyk
This thing about Griffin not wanting to run the RO is bugging me.
Plus can we stop saying we have a read option based offense? It's a play-action based system. A play we ran 8 times per game doesn't equate to a base system.
The read option isn't off the table. Otherwise why did they practice it so much and ran it a bunch in preseason games with White?
It's definitely still in the game plan, but depending on game situations sometimes it will be called more often, sometimes less.
We fell behind early against Philly and couldn't get anything going. The RO isn't a threat when the other team knows you're in catchup mode and are going to pass every play.
Too many people are falling into the trap of looking at the results of one game and drawing hardline conclusions about how the other 15 games are going to go.
|
Completely right.
We'd be foolish to abandon the offense that had us ranked #1 in the league in rushing and 5th overall.
Did any of you ever think that perhaps we went with a simple game plan for RGIII's first game back not just to protect him, but to ease him back in? Even with a simple playbook, he still struggled. He just needed (needs) rep and once his rhythm and confidence back, we'll roll out everything we ran last season.
And as Matty said, we fell behind and had to abandon the run game to get back into the game, which we did.
The read option did not get him injured, trying to run through defenders on scrambles instead of getting down our to the sidelines did.
Griffin is one of the most competitive players in the league. Why wouldn't he want to run what works?