Quote:
Originally Posted by NC_Skins
|
All three were repeat offenders of varying degrees - one on seemingly minor charges. Had any of them actually served significant time, this man might still be alive.
I get the underlying problems with a draconian application of the "3 Strikes And Your Out" rule. At the same time, why do repeat offenders get sooo many chances. I have a matter where the guy committed seven violent crimes, plead guilty and got suspended sentence after suspended sentence until he finally killed someone. It boggles the mind.