Quote:
Originally Posted by Mattyk
I like stuff like this
Why? Wasn't Kelly a rookie HC last year too??
Maybe he doesn't reach those numbers but to think he can't post very productive numbers here is just crazy.
|
Yeah, he won't put up 82-1332-9, because Kelly's offense makes players look better than they really are(Foles), but to think he can't put up good numbers is crazy. 65-1000-5 is very realistic.
Also, not sure how Mr. Watkins came to the conclusion that Dallas' receiver corps is better than ours. He wrote that, "Bryant and Williams are an emerging force that's going to be difficult to stop on a consistent basis within the division." Fair enough, but Garcon is a great receiver too, even if not as good as Bryant, and DeSean Jackson is far better than Williams. And as of right now, the WRs behind Garcon/Jackson are much, much better than those behind Bryant/Williams. His only argument that "proved" that Dallas' corps is better was when he listed Bryant's stats against Philly versus Jackson's stats against Dallas. Dafuq? Another of his rationales: "Terrance Williams, as a rookie, had a four-game stretch with at least one receiving touchdown and his speed makes him a big-play threat." Did he forget to mention that we have the guy who is possibly the best deep threat in the game?
The thinking behind that article is lacking a bit, to say the least.