Quote:
Originally Posted by over the mountain
Heard DS hired a lobbyist firm to take over this issue.
Good move - BA should only have to worry and spend time and effort on football operations, not necessarily PR and senate action issues this is becoming.
Bad - that is a lot of money that could been spent on reducing the cost of parking, upgrading a facility or a zillion other things that could have made the fan or player experience better.
|
Yeah, here's a link. Great move by Snyder.
Redskins hire lobbying firm after senators call for nickname*change | SI Wire
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lotus
CRed, with all respect, dominant culture folks simply took land from Indians, killed them off by the handfuls, and then destroyed their remaining cultures, leaving many of their descendents to eke out a bare existence on reservation lands that often are so bad, no one else wants them.
But if only 24% of Indians oppose the vanity of a sports team nickname because they consider it offensive, the name should stay?<snip>
|
With all due respect to you as well, that first paragraph has very little to do with the name-change issue; the only reason it's even relevant is because we're on the topic of Native Americans.
Yeah, white people invaded the Native American's land and forced the original Americans to find new homes, but we're talking about the nickname of a football team that's meant to honor Native Americans and came about hundreds of years after what you're talking about. Certainly not a reason to change the name.