Quote:
Originally Posted by warriorzpath
If Mariota is there - I believe the Redskins should and will take him. Consensus from draft scouting experts is Mariota is a top 10 player on their big boards.
|
Why would you take another QB who's an exact clone of RGIII and shares his same flaws? (coming from spread offense) Jay wants no part of it, that much is pretty evident. When are people going to learn you don't draft spread offense QBs unless your plan is to sit them for a good while as they learn? Did anybody listen to Mike Shanahan's interview when he discussed how Robert wasn't ready for a conventional offense even after year 1?? These guys are projects in the biggest form.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Skins4L
let rg get one year where he feels like his job isnt on the line. kills a players confidence. some it helps. some it just irritates and gets in theyre head and they play worse.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by skinsfaninok
I have a weird feeling that we r going to trade griffin on draft day and take mariota. Anyone else feel this way?
|
I can see them moving Griffin on trade day, but not drafting Mariota. They'll move back if they can.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lotus
Not necessarily.
B) Many folks think that Bradford, when healthy, is better than Foles and way better than Mariota.
|
Valid point and one that's backed up by an article I read in Feb. about how teams were liking Bradford over Mariota. This goes back to my point about Chip using Bradford as a bargaining piece to move up for MM. Why would he if they valued Bradford over MM? Also, if any teams in top 5-10 valued Bradford over MM, why wouldn't they just trade that pick to the Rams for Bradford? If I"m the Titans and want a QB and think Bradford is better than MM, why not trade the #2 for him? That's provided all the other players on your board rank below Bradford as well.