Quote:
Originally Posted by 30gut
Like with any prospects in any draft some coaches and scouts will like them and some wont. Only time will tell.
For me its as simple as this:
Would you agree that QB is a position that needed to be addressed?
Was that area addressed?
|
If McLovin spent two or three picks on QBs to address the issue at QB and none of them make the roster, the QB position would still need to be addressed.
Instead, he invested in guys that have a legit shot at making the roster and immediately contributing on special teams. His picks simultaneously (through BPA) build depth on a very thin team.
I'm in favor of BPA even if it doesn't address an immediate need such as QB.
I don't think it was a mistake if our picks were higher on our draft board than the QBs still available.
I would like to see how the QBs on our roster play with upgraded pass protection combined with running the ball effectively while not playing from behind by two touchdowns.