Commanders Post at The Warpath - View Single Post

offiss · 10-03-2005, 03:18 AM

No matter how good anyone say's Brunell played the Hawk's were in a position to beat us at home on the final play, personally I don't lay our offensive woe's on Brunell as much as Gibbs, it's Gibbs job to get it into Brunells head to hit recievers out of their cut's and so on.

IMO we are more talented than the Seahawks, and as talented as any team in the league, it is unacceptable to be in a position to lose at home on the final play to seattle, I don't care what their record was coming in, I have never been impressed with Ray Rhodes on defense, and Holgrum is nothing special, we wont get away with this kind of play against better teams, who IMO we haven't faced yet.

Chicago- no QB

Dallas- no nothing

Seattle- poorly coached

IMO going into Denver will be our first real test.

10-03-2005, 03:18 AM	#64
offiss Registered User Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: sparta, new jersey [ northern jersey ] Age: 61 Posts: 3,097	Re: Brunell No matter how good anyone say's Brunell played the Hawk's were in a position to beat us at home on the final play, personally I don't lay our offensive woe's on Brunell as much as Gibbs, it's Gibbs job to get it into Brunells head to hit recievers out of their cut's and so on. IMO we are more talented than the Seahawks, and as talented as any team in the league, it is unacceptable to be in a position to lose at home on the final play to seattle, I don't care what their record was coming in, I have never been impressed with Ray Rhodes on defense, and Holgrum is nothing special, we wont get away with this kind of play against better teams, who IMO we haven't faced yet. Chicago- no QB Dallas- no nothing Seattle- poorly coached IMO going into Denver will be our first real test.