Quote:
Originally Posted by Flyer97
It was the same thing about the Lions game with folks in the NFL.com and ESPN forums saying they thought that our line dogged the game to teach RG III a lesson. I posted that thought on the game thread and was asked if I was drunk or was accused of being a toxic presence. Some guys seemed livid, but I can't see any offensive line being destroyed like that with some jobs being on the line unless there was some collusion involved with said parties. Not everything is a conspiracy, but there might be something to that train of thought in this case.
|
Which guy was dogging it?
The guy trying to make the 53 (Smith)?
The guy who was brought in under a different GM and didn't thrill anyone last year and wants to stay past his current contract (Lavau)?
The guy who is undersized at his position and isn't the prototype the new GM is looking for (Lich)
The rookie who now somehow feels comfortable enough to teach the franchise QB a lesson after switching positions (Scherff)?
The guy who just broke into the starting lineup and was initially the second choice behind a Scherff/Long combo (Moses)?
I'm an idiot, but that's the dumbest idea I've ever heard if you're serious.
You've posted it twice now
Which one of the 5 intentionally let RG3 get hit?