Quote:
Originally Posted by DYoungJelly
Why would a team build an entire offense around a guy that is as durable as a faberge egg, has become incredibly one dimensional, and has shown no progress in 3 years?
Kyle Shanahan did that already. Griffin broke, and the rest is history.
Now, after completely revamping personnel and coaching staff he can't adapt.
It's basically employing the exact opposite strategy Seattle build their depth and thus success with . Year after year they kept getting younger and deeper.
They also kept plugging in one QB after another until they found a gem in Wilson.
If I understand you correctly, you're advocating continually changing coaches, systems, and possibly personnel; all to accommodate the diminishing skill set of one player who had 1 good year?
Or, at least be willing to change all that if Kirk doesn't work out?
Wouldn't it be quicker, more cost effective, and ultimately more successful to just copy Seattle?
|
You raise some interesting questions that aren't in response to my post.
The post you responded was a discussion of where/what is the benefit of having Griffin off the team? Especially if J and Kirk fail?
I have no problem discussing the questions you raise but would also like to have the original intent of the post to which you responded addressed.