Has anyone else here noticed the obvious disconnect between what Gibbs thinks it takes for a team to win and what the "experts" think it takes for a team to win.
Gibbs always sites:
- Character
- Mental Toughness
- Team attitude
- Smarts
- Fight
- Faith
Experts always site:
- Matchups
- Records
- Statistics
- Specific Players
In other words, experts look strictly at the tangables, Gibbs looks for the things that can't be readily measured. That is why I don't think some people will ever get why Gibbs is so successful, that is until they notice he is winning.