View Single Post
Old 10-10-2005, 02:45 PM   #12
SUNRA
The Starter
 
SUNRA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,680
Re: Did anyone else watch Comcast postgame? (Lavar Related)

Quote:
Originally Posted by tjmorgan
I agree that Lavar tends to play out of position. But clearly we need a pass rush. No sacks yesterday. I can believe that there is not at least one package that he fits into where all he has to do is rush the qb. No need to fall into protection or stop the run, simply all out rush on the passer. I find it very hard to believe that he can't at least contribute that way. The man is a beast and to stop him on a blitz is tough. At least with him in the game, offenses have to think about him and maybe it allows someone else to get the qb. It is a shame not to get any sacks and have him sitting on the bench. Just my opionion.
But remember the sack leader for the Redskins in 2004 was Sean Springs. The reason being, GW doesn't have to send a LB to sack the QB. Instead send the CB's in and let the LB's bring the wood if the pass gets off. I'm a big Lavar fan as most of you. I've got the authenic jersey and the whole nine yards. But I'm not putting GW down because of a personal dilemma Lavar has in respecting and adjusting to the current coaching staff. If he doesn't want to play within the package set up for him he doesn't deserve to play. How can we speculate on Lavar would do if he were in the game more often when he hasn't made any impact when he has played? He's becoming a distraction and it's a sad commentary on his part.
__________________
Redskins Member since 1970
SUNRA is offline   Reply With Quote

Advertisements
 
Page generated in 0.70850 seconds with 10 queries