Quote:
Originally Posted by FlyerSkin
Do they want to wait a year? That is the question. They still need a QB now that Kap is a FA. They need a QB now!!!!!!!!!!!!! The market is hot for Kirk. In a trade that helps the Skins, in resigning him it hurts them. The FO might not think he is worth what he wants and the only way to get something is get a trade done. It is the only way they can look like a winner in this after screwing up not signing him last year for less. I still hope this isn't the case and they are going to sign him to a long term deal. I wonder if this is just the media idiots at NFL.com trying to actually make news. It could just be a total misinformation campaign.
|
I agree SF needs a QB this year. Anybody going to SF will require 18 - 20 million a year. I do not think they are willing to take a mulligan on this year. They will eaither draft a QB or sign someone. Kyle maybe a boy genius but he has 3 years to show an improvement. He can't afford to waste a year and hope KC walks. What happens if Tom Brady gets hurt this year and NE needs a QB next year? Would KC go to SF over NE?
I think the Redskins have all the leverage. He signs the tag or he doesn't. If he doesn't sign, he doesn't play and he looses 24 million. If he doesn't sign a long term deal, he rids the pine on the practice squad and Colt is the starter. We draft in the top 5 next year and we have a long term QB. Nobody is going to give him a 20+ million a season long term deal after sitting the pine for a season.
From the cheap seats in Nebraska, it looks like a media driven shit storm.