Quote:
Originally Posted by mooby
Idk that it's a shit call, for me it's really hard to define. You can't tell that he fully regained possession before he touched out OOB, and the ball was definitely loose when he crossed the goal line. If he had re-secured possession in the end zone without going OOB it would definitely be a td. But where do you tell that he re-secured possession in the endzone before touching out? Just a hard call to define, one fanbase would be disappointed one way or the other.
|
No one else who reviewed that play to see if it was a score mentioned or thought that would possibly be a fumble. He had the ball back wheb he went across. If that was Gronk, I don't see the ref making the same call.