Quote:
Originally Posted by CRedskinsRule
I don't think you get the point of the section I quoted earlier - it specifically states that's a violation:
By offering the FT tender the Skins would be making the legal declaration that they intend to have KC back on contract on the 1st game of the season AT the tender amount, unless the two sides mutually agree on a long term deal. Having a deal that KC won't sign on the table, and a contract offered to AS which would put us over the cap with the FT amount would seemingly be a no brainer for the grievance judge to find us in violation.
|
They can structure the deal so that he is getting his tender offer this year.
Trust me if the Skins have it in place to get a second or higher than they will tag him. There is a reason you have lawyers.
Sent from my SM-G955W using Tapatalk