Quote:
Originally Posted by Defensewins
|
I think it's about formulation.
IMHNNESO (FYI, this stands for: In My Humble Non-Native-English-Speaker Opinion) once you have the concept of "control of the ball", you must define a time element.
Because how would you precisely define controlling the ball other than having the ball NOT moving... for a given period of time ?
So the final part simply is a way to phrase that time element without the word "time", so it looks less subjective...
All there's to remember is that they got rid of the "surviving the ground" part, which created so much controversy.
I think it might take a few weeks before the rule is consistently applied the same way, but I feel like it's a step in the direction of closing the gap between the rule and how people think it should be.