Quote:
|
Originally Posted by smootsmack
First off, I could be really anal and say it should be "than" not "then" but I won't do that
Secondly, what's with this Peter King fascination? At the end of the day, he's just another human being with opinions a.ka. "things I think I think". Along with the Sean Taylor scenario, he thinks he thinks (how does someone think they think anyway? don't you just think?) that Jacksonville and Seattle will play in the Super Bowl (I personally think they could make the conference finals) and that Darnell Dockett will win defensive rookie of the year honors. Does that mean it's going to happen because King thinks it? That's his opinion, he's entitled to it and others are entitled to challenge and question it. But, that doesn't mean King knows more than everybody else. What if John Clayton comes out and says "Taylor is thrilled to be a Redskin" What then? Isn't Clayton as qualified if not more so?
Besides, what was even the point of what King was writing? "I think Taylor isn't happy but it's not a big deal because Gibbs will work it out" Is that even a story?
|
Dude, I'll even go a step further and say that a LOT (not all) of analysts talk out of their asses. A couple members of the media will label a player as something, and the rest of them will regurgitate it. Yes, they have access to places we don't, yes they appear on The Dan Patrick show, and Mike & Mike, but at the end of the day, I'd take an imformed fans opinion just as readily as an analysts. Espescially when it comes to fans of a specific team, that watch every down, play, etc. They're the ones that know what they're talking about.
That said, Taylor will be kicking some shit for the Skins next season, and will be a candidate for the DROY. If there's any merritt at all to this rumour, it's probably just a little posturing by him and his new (?) agent.