Quote:
Originally Posted by mooby
God help me as I don't want to be labelled "the Fidel Castro defender" here, but is it possible he could have been endorsing some (I assume Castro had his good moments, few and far between as they might have been) good that Castro might have done, while at the same time being ignorant to the bad he's done as well?
If Kaep came out and said Castro was a good man, and totally not to blame for Cuba's problems of the last 50 years I would probably say Kaep is clueless based off the minimal evidence available. But things aren't always as clear cut as people want them to be.
|
Castro lead a regime that was rife with racism...in a situation where a genocide label coulda fit.
So to say Kaep is an ignorant sob...he clearly is.